The Relationship of Vertical and Horizontal Velocity Gradients in the Perception of Shape, Rotation, and Rigidity

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 1257-1272

  Liter, Jeffrey C ^a   Braunstein, Myron L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; ROTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; ROTATION; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0032133264     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1257     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bennett, B. M., Hoffman, D. D., Nicola, J. E., & Prakash, C. (1989). Structure from two orthographic views of rigid motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A6, 1052-1069.
2. Braunstein, M. L. (1968). Motion and texture as sources of slant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 247-253.
3. Braunstein, M. L. (1994). Decoding principles, heuristics, and inference in visual perception. In G. Jansson, S. S. Bergstrom, & W. Epstein (Eds.), Perceiving events and objects (pp. 436-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Braunstein, M. L., & Andersen, G. J. (1981). Velocity gradients and relative depth perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 145-155.
5. Braunstein, M. L., Liter, J. C., & Tittle, J. S. (1993). Recovering 3-D shape from perspective translations and orthographic rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 598-614.
6. Braunstein, M. L., & Tittle, J. S. (1988). The observer-relative velocity field as the basis for effective motion parallax. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 582-590.
7. Caudek, C., & Proffitt, D. R. (1993). Depth perception in motion parallax and stereokinesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 32-47.
8. Domini, F., & Braunstein, M. L. (1998). Recovery of 3-D structure from motion is neither Euclidean nor affine. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1273-1295.
9. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (in press). Perception of surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
10. Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Gerbino, W. (1995). Perception of surface attitude in SFM displays. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 36, S360.
11. Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Proffitt, D. R. (1997). Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1111-1129.
12. Eagle, R. A., & Blake, A. (1995). Two-dimensional constraints on three-dimensional structure from motion tasks. Vision Research, 35, 2927-2941.
13. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14. Gibson, E. J., Gibson, J. J., Smith, O. W., & Flock, H. (1959). Motion parallax as a determiner of perceived slant. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 40-51.
15. Hogervorst, M. A., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. (1996). Structure from motion: A tolerance analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 449-459.
16. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doom, A. J. (1975). Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta, 22, 773-791.
17. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doom, A. J. (1991). Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A8, 377-385.
18. Liter, J. C., & Braunstein, M. L. (1994). Judged rotation magnitude in structure-from-motion with and without frontal views. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 35(4), 1742.
19. Liter, J. C., Braunstein, M. L., & Hoffman, D. D. (1993). Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multiview displays. Perception, 22, 1441-1465.
20. Norman, J. F., & Todd, J. T. (1993). The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 279-291.
21. Ono, M., Rivest, J., & Ono, H. (1986). Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 331-337.
22. Perotti, V. J., Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (1996). The visual perception of rigid motion from constant flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 666-679.
23. Proffitt, D. R., Rock, I., Hecht, H., & Schubert, J. (1992). Stereokinetic effect and its relation to the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 3-21.
24. Rogers, B. J., & Collett, T. S. (1989). The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 697-717.
25. Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 663-678.
26. Todd, J. T., & Bressan, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 419-430.
27. Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 509-523.
28. Ullman, S. (1977). The interpretation of visual motion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
29. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Werkhoven, P., & van Veen, H. A. H. C. (1995). Extraction of relief from visual motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 645-656.