If only half of international agreements have dispute resolution provisions, which half needs explaining?

Journal of Legal Studies

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 189-212

  Koremenos, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34047264660     PISSN: 00472530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/509275     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Duncan Snidal. 2000. The Concept of Legalization. International Organization 54:401-19.
2. Blankenburg, Erhard. 1998. Patterns of Legal Culture: The Netherlands Compared to Neighboring Germany. American Journal of Comparative Law 46: 1-41.
3. Busch, Marc L. 2000. Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes under GATT. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44:425-46.
4. Charnovitz, Steve. 2001. Rethinking WTO Trade Sanction. American Journal of International Law 95:792-832.
5. Coase, R. H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4:386-405.
6. Cooter, Robert, Stephen Marks, and Robert H. Mnookin. 1982. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior. Journal of Legal Studies 11:225-51.
7. Duffield, John S. 2003. The Limits of "Rational Design." International Organization 57:411-30.
8. Garvey, Jack I. 1995. Trade Law and Quality of Life-Dispute Resolution under the NAFTA Side Accords on Labor and the Environment. American Journal of International Law 89:439-53.
9. Goldstein, Judith, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2000. Introduction: Legalization and World Politics. International Organization 54:385-99.
10. Guzman, Andrew, and Beth A. Simmons. 2002. To Settle or Empanel? An Empirical Analysis of Litigation and Settlement at the World Trade Organization. Journal of Legal Studies 31:205-36.
11. Hathaway, Oona A. 2002. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Yale Law Journal 111:1937-2042.
12. Husa, Jaakko. 2000. Guarding the Constitutionality of Laws in the Nordic Countries: A Comparative Perspective. American Journal of Comparative Law 48: 345-81.
13. Jackson, John H. 1978. The Jurisprudence of International Trade: The Disc Case in GATT. American Journal of International Law 72:747-81.
14. Katz, Avery. 1990. The Strategic Structure of Offer and Acceptance: Game Theory and the Law of Contract Formation. Michigan Law Review 89:215-95.
15. Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson, and Duncan Snidal. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55:761-99.
16. Koremenos, Barbara, and Duncan Snidal. 2003. Moving Forward, One Step at a Time. International Organization 57:431-44.
17. Lubman, Stanley. 1991. Studying Contemporary Chinese Law: Limits, Possibilities and Strategy. American Journal of Comparative Law 39:293-341.
18. Lutz, Robert E. 1976. The Laws of Environmental Management: a Comparative Study. American Journal of Comparative Law 24:447-520.
19. Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1990. Bargaining Costs, Influence Costs, and the Organization of Economic Activity. Pp. 57-89 in Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, edited by James Alt and Kenneth Shepsle. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Mnookin, Robert H., and Lewis Kernhauser. 1979. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce. Yale Law Journal 88:950-99.
21. North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Pauwelyn, Joost. 2001. The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go? American Journal of International Law 95:535-78.
23. Posner, Eric A., and Miguel E P. de Figueiredo. 2005. Is the International Court of Justice Biased? Journal of Legal Studies 34:599-630.
24. Schloemann, Hannes L., and Stefan Ohlhoff. 1999. " Constitutionalization" and Dispute Settlement in the WTO: National Security as an Issue of Competence. American Journal of International Law 93:424-51.
25. Schwartz, Warren F., and Alan O. Sykes. 2002. The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization. Journal of Legal Studies 31:179-204.
26. Smith, James McCall. 2000. The Politics of Dispute Settlement Design: Explaining Legalism in Regional Trade Pacts. International Organization 54:137-80.
27. Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO. International Organization 56:339-74.
28. Sweet, Alec S., and Thomas L. Brunell. 1998. Constructing a Supranational Constitution: Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community. American Political Science Review 92:63-81.
29. Walt, Stephen M. 1999. Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies. International Security 23:5-48.