Clinical performance and wear resistance of two compomers in posterior occlusal restorations of permanent teeth: Six-year follow-up

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 118-123

  Lund, Rafael Guerra ^a   Sehn, Felipe Perraro ^a   Piva, Evandro ^a   Detoni, Diego ^a   De Moura, Flávio Renato Reis ^b   Cardoso, Paulo Eduardo Capel ^c   Demarco, Flávio Fernando ^a,d  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE LUTERANA DO BRASIL   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOMER; DYRACT; F2000 CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; POLYVINYL DERIVATIVE; SILOXANE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VINYL POLYSILOXANE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BICUSPID; COLOR; COMPOMERS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; POLYVINYLS; RECURRENCE; SILOXANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 33947715462     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/06-71     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD & Demarco FF (2006) A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings Journal of Dentistry 34(7) 427-435.
2. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G & Hickel R (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition Operative Dentistry 29(5) 481-508.
3. Koupis NS, Vercruysse CW, Marks LA, Martens LC & Verbeeck RM (2004) Curing depth of (polyacid-modified) composite resins determined by scraping and a penetrometer Dental Materials 20(10) 908-914.
4. Ruse ND (1999) What is a "componer"? Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 65(9) 500-504.
5. Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Smales RJ & Wei SH (2002) Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results American Journal of Dentistry 15(6) 403-406.
6. Hicks J, García-Godoy F, Donly K & Flaitz C (2002) Fluoride-releasing restorative materials and secondary caries Dental Clinics of North America 46(2) 247-276.
7. van Dijken JW (1996) 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations American Journal of Dentistry 9(5) 195-198.
8. Roeters JJ, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk RC & Peters TC (1998) Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results American Journal of Dentistry 11(3) 143-148.
9. Turgut MD, Tekcicek M & Olmez S (2004) Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite under different conditioning methods in primary teeth Operative Dentistry 29(5) 515-523.
10. Cehreli ZC & Altay N (2000) Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in minimally invasive occlusal cavities Journal of Dentistry 28(2) 117-122.
11. Burgess JO, Walker R & Davidson JM (2002) Posterior resin-based composite: Review of the literature Pediatric Dentistry 24(5) 465-479.
12. de Moura FR, Piva E, Lund RG, Palha B & Demarco FF (2004) One-year clinical evaluation of two polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in posterior permanent teeth The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 6(2) 157-162.
13. Demirci M & Sancakli HS (2006) Five-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities American Journal of Dentistry 19(1) 41-46.
14. Peters MC, Delong R, Pintado MR, Pallesen U, Qvist V & Douglas WH (1999) Comparison of two measurement techniques for clinical wear Journal of Dentistry 27(7) 479-485.
15. Huth KC, Manhart J, Selbertinger A, Paschos E, Kaaden C, Kunzelmann KH & Hickel R (2004) 4-year clinical performance and survival analysis of Class I and II compomer restorations in permanent teeth American Journal of Dentistry 17(1) 51-55.
16. Aliping-McKenzie M, Linden RW & Nicholson JW (2004) The effect of Coca-Cola and fruit juices on the surface hardness of glass-ionomers and "compomers" Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 31(11) 1046-1052.
17. Bagheri R, Burrow MF & Tyas M (2005) Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials Journal of Dentistry 33(5) 389-398.
18. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Gingell JC & Gilner PP (1995) A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified. Glass ionomer restorative material Journal of the American Dental Association 126(9) 1245-1253.
19. Sun Y & Lau J (2004) Evidence for healthcare: Large trials or meta-analyses of small trials? Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice 4(1) 41-46.
20. Bayne SC & Schmalz G (2005) Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials Clinical Oral Investigations 9(4) 209-214.
21. Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Pashley DH, Peters MC, Lai SC, Yiu CK & Cheong C (2003) Aging affects two modes of nanoleakage expression in bonded dentin Journal of Dental Research 82(7) 537-541.
22. Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M & De Stefano Dorigo E (2000) Cervical compomer restorations: The role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation Operative Dentistry 25(5) 382-387.
23. Zantner C, Kielbassa AM, Martus P & Kunzelmann KH (2004) Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers Dental Materials 20(3) 277-285.
24. American Dental Association (1996) Council on Scientific Affairs. Acceptance Program Guidelines to Restorative Materials. Retrieved online March 1996 from: http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/positions/standards/guide_ materials_restore.pdf)