A cytochrome c oxidase model catalyzes oxygen to water reduction under rate-limiting electron flux

Science

Volumn 315, Issue 5818, 2007, Pages 1565-1568

  Collman, James P ^a   Devaraj, Neal K ^a   Decréau, Richard A ^a   Yang, Ying ^a   Yan, Yi Long ^a   Ebina, Wataru ^a   Eberspacher, Todd A ^a   Chidsey, Christopher E D ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPPER; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; IRON; OXYGEN; PHENOL; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE; TYROSINE; WATER;

CATALYSIS; ELECTRODE; ELECTRON; ENZYME ACTIVITY; IRON; OXYGEN; REACTION KINETICS; REDUCTION; STEADY-STATE EQUILIBRIUM; WATER;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CATALYST; COVALENT BOND; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME METABOLISM; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REDUCTION; STEADY STATE;

BINDING SITES; CATALYSIS; COPPER; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTRODES; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; ELECTRONS; IRON; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; OXYGEN; PHENOL; TYROSINE; WATER;

EID: 33947379088     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1135844     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. M. Brunori, A. Giuffre, P. Sarti, J. Inorg. Biochem. 99, 324 (2005).
2. J. E. Morgan, M. I. Verkhovsky, G. Palmer, M. Wikstrom, Biochemistry 40, 6882 (2001).
3. D. A. Proshlyakov et al., Science 290, 1588 (2000).
4. B. Chazotte, C. R. Hackenbrock, J. Biol. Chem. 264, 4978 (1989).
5. S. S. Gupte, C. R. Hackenbrock, J. Biol. Chem. 263, 5248 (1988).
6. T. Mogi, T. Hirano, H. Nakamura, Y. Anraku, Y. Orii, FEBS Lett 370, 259 (1995).
7. T. K. Das, C. Pecoraro, F. L. Tomson, R. B. Gennis, D. L. Rousseau, Biochemistry 37, 14471 (1998).
8. U. Pfitzner et al., J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 30, 89 (1998).
9. J. P. Collman, L. Fu, P. C. Herrmann, X. Zhang, Science 275, 949 (1997).
10. J. P. Collman et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 9783 (1994).
11. J. P. Collman et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 1387 (1999).
12. J. P. Collman, C. J. Sunderland, R. Boulatov, Inorg. Chem. 41, 2282 (2002).
13. T. Tsukihara et al., Science 269, 1069 (1995).
14. J. P. Collman, R. A. Decréau, C. Zhang, J. Org. Chem. 69, 3546 (2004).
15. K. S. Alleman, K. Weber, S. E. Creager, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 17050 (1996).
16. S. Z. Zou, R. S. Clegg, F. C. Anson, Langmuir 18, 3241 (2002).
17. D. A. Offord et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 4478 (1998).
18. J. E. Hutchison, T. A. Postlethwaite, R. W. Murray, Langmuir 9, 3277 (1993).
19. J. Zak, H. P. Yuan, M. Ho, L. K. Woo, M. D. Porter, Langmuir 9, 2772 (1993).
20. C. E. D. Chidsey, Science 251, 919 (1991).
21. S. Creager et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 1059 (1999).
22. H. O. Finklea, D. D. Hanshew, J. Am. Chem. Soc 114, 3173 (1992).
23. J. P. Collman, N. K. Devaraj, T. P. A. Eberspacher, C. E. D. Chidsey, Langmuir 22, 2457 (2006).
24. J. P. Collman, N. K. Devaraj, C. E. D. Chidsey, Langmuir 20, 1051 (2004).
25. J. K. Lee, Y. S. Chi, I. S. Choi, Langmuir 20, 3844 (2004).
26. V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin, K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 2596 (2002).
27. C. W. Tornoe, C. Christensen, M. Meldal, J. Org. Chem. 67, 3057 (2002).
28. N. K. Devaraj, R. A. Decreau, W. Ebina, J. P. Collman, C. E. D. Chidsey, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 1595S (2006).
29. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
30. R. Boulatov, J. P. Collman, I. M. Shiryaeva, C. J. Sunderland, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 11923 (2002).
31. A. S. Haas et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 11351 (2001).
32. S. K. Cha, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 25, 786 (2004).
33. T. H. Degefa, P. Schon, D. Bongard, L. Walder, J. Electroanal. Chem. 574, 49 (2004).
34. E. Katz, H. L. Schmidt, J. Electroanal. Chem. 36B, 87 (1994).
35. J. A. Sigman, B. C. Kwok, Y. Lu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 8192 (2000).
36. G. T. Babcock, M. Wikstrom, Nature 356, 301 (1992).
37. J. P. Collman, R. Boulatov, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 3487 (2002).
38. The peroxide detected at the ring electrode could arise either from direct release of peroxide during the catalytic cycle or from release and rapid disproportionation of superoxide (42). The hydrolytic autoxidation of heme oxygen complexes in aqueous solution is a well-documented phenomenon (39, 43). This process is known to be catalyzed by protons, and preliminary results indicate that the selectivity of all of our catalysts can be markedly improved by raising the pH (to the range of 8 to 12). Furthermore, our prior work with CcO models on edge-plane graphite provided evidence that superoxide is a substantial source of PROS (30).
39. K. Shikama, Chem. Rev. 98, 1357 (1998).
40. S. E. Creager, G. K. Rowe, Langmuir 9, 2330 (1993).
41. G. B. Sigal, M. Mrksich, G. M. Whitesides, Langmuir 13, 2749 (1997).
42. D. T. Sawyer, J. S. Valentine, Acc. Chem. Res. 14, 393 (1981).
43. J. P. Collman, Y. L. Yan, T. Eberspacher, X. J. Xie, E. I. Solomon, Inorg. Chem. 44, 9628 (2005).
44. We dedicate this scientific contribution to the memory of the late H. Taube. We thank J. I. Brauman, T. D. P. Stack, C. C. Cummins, R. Boulatov, and P. H. Dinolfo for helpful discussions. N.K.D., R.A.D., and W.E. acknowledge a Stanford graduate fellowship, a Lavoisier fellowship, and a Dreyfus undergraduate fellowship, respectively. This material has its basis in work supported by the NIH under grant GM-17880-35.