The development of practices for action in classroom dyadic interaction: Focus on task openings

Modern Language Journal

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 83-96

  Hellermann, John ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846987955     PISSN: 00267902     EISSN: 15404781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00503.x     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Au, K. H. (1980). Participation structures in a reading lesson with Hawaiian children: Analysis of a culturally appropriate instructional event. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 11, 91-115.
2. Bremer, K., Broeder, P., Roberts, C., Simonot, M., & Vasseur, M. (1993). Ways of achieving understanding. In C. Perdue (Ed.), Adult language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Vol. 2: The results (pp. 154-195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 29-47.
4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
5. Chafe, W. L. (1974). Language and consciousness. Language, 50, 111-133.
6. Cicourel, A. V. (1974). Some basic theoretical issues in the assessment of the child's performance in testing and classroom settings. In A. V. Cicourel, K. A. Jennings, S. H. M. Jennings, K. C. W. Leiter, R. McKay, H. Mehan, & D. R. Roth (Eds.), Language use and school performance (pp. 300-351). New York: Academic Press.
7. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4, 193-220.
10. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Erickson, F. (1982). Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. In L. C. Wilkinson (Ed.), Communicating in the classroom (pp. 153-181). New York: Academic Press.
12. Erickson, F., & Mohatt, G. (1982). Cultural organization of participation structures in two classrooms of Indian students. In G. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling: Educational anthropology in action (pp. 132-175). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
13. Ford, C. E., & Fox, B. A. (1996). Interactional motivations for reference formulation: He had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two Olds. In B. A. Fox (Ed.), Studies in anaphora (pp. 145-168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.). (2002). The language of turn and sequence. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakin (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 338-366). New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
16. Gibbons, P. (1998). Classroom talk and the learning of new registers in a second language. Language and Education, 12, 99-118.
17. Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
18. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
19. Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 272-302.
20. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hall, J. K. (1993). The role of oral practices in the accomplishment of our everyday lives: The sociocultural dimension of interaction with implications for the learning of another language. Applied Linguistics, 14, 145-166.
22. Hall, J. K. (1995). "Aw man, where you goin'?": Classroom interaction and the development of L2 interactional competence. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 37-62.
23. Hall, J. K. (2004a). Language learning as an interactional achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Portland, OR.
24. Hall, J. K. (2004b). Language learning as an interactional achievement. Modern Language Journal, 88, 607-612.
25. Hall, J. K., & Verplaeste, L. S. (Eds.). (2000). Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 402-435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
27. He, A. W. (2004). CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88, 568-582.
28. Heath, C. (1984). Talk and recipiency: Sequential organization in speech and body movement. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 247-265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Hellermann, J. (2004, May). Openings of dyadic interaction for adult learners of English. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Portland, OR.
30. Hellermann, J. (2005). Syntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 105-130.
31. Hellermann, J. (2006). Classroom interactive practices for literacy: A microethnographic study of two beginning adult learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 377-404.
32. Hemmings, T., Randall, D., Marr, L., & Francis, D. (2000). Task, talk and closure: Situated learning and the use of an "interactive"museum artifact. In S. Hester & D. Francis (Eds.), Local education order: Ethnomethodological studies and knowledge in action (pp. 223-244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Hester, S., & Francis, D. (Eds.). (2000). Local educational order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
35. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Kanagy, R. (1999). Interactional routines as a mechanism for L2 acquisition and socialization in an immersion context. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1467-1492.
37. Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. Modern Language Journal, 88, 551-567.
38. Kinginger, C. (1994). Learner initiative in conversation management: An application of van Lier's pilot coding scheme. Modern Language Journal, 78, 29-40.
39. Korobov, N., & Bamberg, M. (2004). Positioning a "mature" self in interactive practices: How adolescent males negotiate "physical attraction" in group talk. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 471-492.
40. Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to interactional competence. Modern Language Journal, 70, 372-366.
41. Lantolf, J. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2004). CA for SLA? It all depends. Modern Language Journal, 88, 603-607.
43. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Leather, J., & van Dam, J. (2003). Towards an ecology of language learning. In J. Leather & J. van Dam (Eds.), Ecology of language acquisition (pp. 1-29). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
45. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 414-468). New York: Academic Press.
46. Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action; Ethnomethodology and studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Macbeth, D. (2000). Classrooms as installations: Direct instruction in the early grades. In S. Hester & D. Francis (Eds.), Local educational order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action (pp. 21-71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Markee, N. (2004). Zones of interactional transition in ESL classes. Modern Language Journal, 88, 583-596.
50. Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 88, 491-500.
51. Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Topic talk, ritual and the social organization of relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 301-316.
52. Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88, 501-518.
53. Mori, J. (1999). Negotiating agreement and disagreement in Japanese: Connective expressions and turn construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
54. Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23, 323-347.
55. Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 88, 536-550.
56. Morita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 573-603.
57. Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation, imagined communities, and the language classroom. In X. Bonch-Bruevich, W. J. Crawford, J. Hellermann, C. Higgins, & H. Nguyen (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2000 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 167-180). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
58. Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.). (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Ohta, A. (1999). Interactional routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1493-1512.
60. Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51-78). New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Ohta, A. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Platt, E., & Brooks, F. B. (2002). Task engagement: A turning point in foreign language development. Language Learning, 52, 365-400.
63. Reder, S., Harris, K., & Setzler, K. (2003). A multimedia adult learner corpus. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 546-557.
64. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1-2). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
65. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversations. Language, 50, 696-735.
66. Sarangi, S. (1998). "I actually turn my back on [some] students": The metacommunicative role of talk in classroom discourse. Language Awareness, 7, 90-108.
67. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
68. Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Recycled turn beginnings. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 70-85). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
69. Schegloff, E. A. (2002a). Beginning in the telephone. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk public performance (pp. 285-299). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Schegloff, E. A. (2002b). Opening sequencing. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 326-385). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Language Learning (Suppl. 1), 1-300.
72. Shea, D. P. (1994). Perspective and production: Structuring conversational participation across cultural borders. Pragmatics, 4, 357-389.
73. Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606-620.
74. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38-62.
75. Stokoe, E. H. (2000). Constructing topicality in university students' small-group discussion: A conversation analytic approach. Language and Education, 14, 184-203.
76. ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.
77. Toohey, K. (1996). Learning English as a second language in kindergarten: A community of practice perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 549-576.
78. Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations and classroom practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
79. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-259). New York: Oxford University Press.
80. van Lier, L. (2002). An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and linguistics. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 140-164). London: Continuum.
81. van Lier, L., & Matsuo, N. (2000). Varieties of conversational experience: Looking for learning opportunities. Applied Language Learning, 11, 265-287.
82. Wagner, J. (2004). The classroom and beyond. Modern Language Journal, 88, 612-616.
83. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Language, learning, and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Wertsch, J. V., & Stone, C. A. (1978). Microgenesis as a tool for developmental analysis. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 9, 8-10.
85. Young, R. F. (1999). Sociolinguistic approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 105-132.
86. Young, R. F. (2000). Interactional competence: Challenges for validity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
87. Young, R. F. (2002). Discourse approaches to oral language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 243-262.
88. Young, R. F., & Miller, E. R. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESOL writing conferences. Modern Language Journal, 88, 519-535.