Defining an economics research program to describe and evaluate ecosystem services

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report PNW

Volumn , Issue 700, 2006, Pages 1-46

  Kline, Jeffrey D ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic analysis; Forests and society; Nonmarket values; Public goods

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; PUBLIC GOODS;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33846853094     PISSN: 08874840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (163)

1. Adams, D.M.; Haynes, R.W. 1996. The 1993 timber assessment market model: structure, projections, and policy simulations. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-368. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 58 p.
2. Albrecht, S.L. 1995. Equity and justice in environmental decision making: a proposed research agenda. Society and Natural Resources. 8:67-72.
3. Alig, R.J. 1986. Econometric analysis of forest acreage trends in the Southeast. Forest Science. 32(1): 119-134.
4. Alig, R.J. 2003. U.S. landowners behavior; land use and land cover changes, and climate change mitigation. Silva Fennica. 37(4): 511-527.
5. Alig, R.J.; Adams, D.M.; McCarl, B.A. 2002. Projecting impacts of global climate change on the US forest and agricultural sectors and carbon budgets. Forest Ecology and Management. 169: 3-14.
6. Alig, R.J.; Butler, R.J. 2004. Projecting large-scale area changes in land use and land cover for terrestrial carbon analyses. Environmental Management. 33(4): 443-456.
7. Alig, R.J.; Healy, R. 1987. Urban and built-up land area changes in the United States: an empirical investigation of determinants. Land Economics. 63(3): 215-226.
8. Alig, R.J.; Kline, J.D.; Lichtenstein, M. 2004. Urbanization on the U.S. landscape: looking ahead in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning. 69: 219-234.
9. Alig, R.J.; Plantinga, A.; Ahn, S.; Kline, J.D. 2003. Land use changes involving forestry in the United States: 1952 to 1997, with projections to 2050. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-587. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 92 p.
10. Apple, D.D. 2000. The Forest Service as a learning organization. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http:// www.fs.fed.us/publications/policy-analysis/fs_learning.html. (March 21, 2005).
11. Arrow, K.; Daily, G.; Dasgupta, P.; Levin, S.; Maler, K.; Maskin, E.; Starrett, D.; Sterner, T.; Tietenberg, T. 2000. Managing ecosystem resources. Environmental Science and Technology. 34: 1401-1406.
12. Banzhaf, S.; Boyd, J. 2005. The architecture and measurement of an ecosystem services index. Discussion paper RFF-DP-05-22. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 54 p.
13. Barlowe, R. 1978. Land resource economics: the economics of real estate. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 653 p.
14. Bengston, D.N. 1994. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Society and Natural Resources. 7: 515-533
15. Bengston, D.N.; Fan, D.P. 2002. The Recreational Fee Demonstration Program on the national forests: an updated analysis of public attitudes and beliefs, 1996-2001. Res. Pap. NC-RP-340. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 12 p.
16. Bengston, D.N.; Fletcher, J.O.; Nelson, K.C. 2004a. Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning. 69(2-3): 271-286.
17. Bengston, D.N.; Webb, T.J.; Fan, D.P. 2004b. Shifting forest value orientations in the United States, 1980-2001: a computer content analysis. Environmental Values. 13: 373-392.
18. Bengston, D.N.; Xu, G.; Fan, D.P. 2001. Attitudes toward ecosystem management in the United States, 1992-1998. Society and Natural Resources. 14: 471-487.
19. Bengston, D.N.; Xu, Z. 1995. Changing national forest values: a content analysis. Res. Pap. NC-RP-323. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Deptartment of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. 29 p.
20. Binkley, C.S. 1981. Timber supply from private nonindustrial forests. Bull. 92. New Haven, CT: School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University. 97 p.
21. Binkley, C.S. 2001. With nothing to lose, is it time to try change in BC? Logging and Sawmilling Journal. Dec 2000/Jan 2001.
22. Bockstael, N.E.; Freeman, A.M.; Kopp, R.J.; Portney, P.R.; Smith, V.K. 2000. On measuring economic values for nature. Environmental Science and Technology. 34(8): 1384-1389.
23. Booth, D.E. 1992. The economics and ethics of old-growth forests. Environmental Ethics. 14: 43-62.
24. Boscolo, M.; Vincent, J.R. 2003. Nonconvexities in the production of timber, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 46: 251-268.
25. Bowen, W. 2002. An analytical review of environmental justice research: What do we really know? Environmental Management. 29(1): 3-15.
26. Bowes, M.D.; Krutilla, J.V. 1989. Multiple-use management: the economics of public forestlands. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 357 p.
27. Bowes, M.D.; Krutilla, J.V.; Sherman, P.B. 1984. Forest management for increased timber and water yields. Water Resources Research. 20: 655-663.
28. Boyd, J. 2004. What's nature worth? Using indicators to open the black box of ecological valuation. Resources. 154: 18-22.
29. Boyd, J. 2006. The nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP? Resources. 162: 6-9.
30. Boyd, J.; Banzhaf, S. 2006. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Discussion Paper RFF-DP-06-02. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 26 p.
31. Boyd, J.; Wainger, L. 2002. Landscape indicators of ecosystem service benefits. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 84(5): 1371-1378.
32. Breffle, W.S.; Rowe, R.D. 2002. Comparing choice question formats for evaluating natural resources tradeoffs. Land Economics. 78(2): 298-314.
33. Broadway, R.W.; Bruce, N. 1993. Welfare economics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. 344 p.
34. Brown, G.; Reed, P. 2000. Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science. 46(2): 240-247.
35. Brown, M.T.; Ulgiati, S. 1999. Emergy evaluation of the biosphere and natural capital. Ambio. 28(6): 486-493.
36. Brown, R.N. 2006. Post-fire recreation management in the Mt. Jefferson Wilderness. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 154 p. M.S. thesis.
37. Brown, T. 1984. The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics. 60: 231-246.
38. Brown, T.C.; Bergstrom, J.C.; Loomis, J.B. [In press]. Defining, valuing and providing ecosystem goods and services. Natural Resources Journal. 47 (2).
39. Butler, B.J.; Swenson, J.J.; Alig, R.J. 2004. Forest fragmentation in the Pacific Northwest: quantification and correlations. Forest Ecology and Management. 189: 363-373.
40. Calish, S.; Fight, R.D.; Teeguarden, D.E. 1978. How do nontimber values affect Douglas-fir rotation? Journal of Forestry. 76: 217-221.
41. Calkin, D.E.; Montgomery, C.A.; Schumaker, N.H.; Polasky, S.; Arthur, J.L.; Nalle, D.J. 2002. Developing a production possibility set of wildlife species persistence and timber harvest value. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 32: 1329-1342.
42. Cathcart, J.F. 2000. Carbon sequestration. Journal of Forestry. 98(9): 32-37.
43. Champ, P.A.; Bishop, R.C. 2001. Donation payment mechanisms and contingent valuation: an empirical study of hypothetical bias. Environmental and Resource Economics. 19: 383-402.
44. Champ, P.A.; Boyle, K.J.; Brown, T.C. 2003. A primer on nonmarket valuation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 576 p.
45. Champ, P.A.; Flores, N.E.; Brown, T.C.; Chivers, J. 2002. Contingent valuation and incentives. Land Economics. 78(4): 591-604.
46. Champ, P.A.; Loomis, J. 1998. Testing the robustness of WTA estimates using the method of paired comparison. Environmental and Resource Economics. 12: 375-386.
47. Clark, R. 2005. Appendix 4: resolving complex and controversial forest management issues: the critical role of social science research. In: Haynes, R.W., ed. Developing an agenda to guide forest social science, economics, and utilization research. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-627. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 42-53.
48. Collins, S. 2005. Putting natural capital to work. Speech addressed to the Ecosystem services conference, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. http://www.fs.fed.us/news/2005/speeches/05/ capital-work.shtml. (September 29, 2005).
49. Cordell, H.K.; Bergstrom, J.C.; Betz, C.J.; Green, G.T. 2004. Dominant socioeconomic forces shaping the future of the United States, In: Manfredo, M.J.; Vaske, J.J.; Bruyere, B.L.; Field, D.R.; Brown, P.J., eds. Society and natural resources: a summary of knowledge. Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho: 349-361.
50. Costanza, R. 2004. Value theory and energy. Encyclopedia of energy. 6: 337-346.
51. Daily, G.D. 1997. Nature's services. Washington, DC: Island Press. 392 p.
52. de Groot, R.D.; Wilson, M.A.; Boumans, R.M.J. 2002. A typology for the classification, description, and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods, and services. Ecological Economics. 41: 393-408.
53. Dennis, D. 1989. An economic analysis of harvest behavior: integrating forest and ownership characteristics. Forest Science. 35: 1088-1104.
54. Dennis, D.F. 1990. A probit analysis of the harvest decision using pooled time-series and cross-sectional data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 18: 176-187.
55. Dennis, D.F. 1998. Analyzing public inputs to multiple objective decisions on national forests using conjoint analysis. Forest Science. 44(3): 421-429.
56. DeStefano, S.; Haight, R.G. 2002, eds. Forest wildife-habitat relationships: population and community responses to forest management. Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters. 275 p.
57. Desvousges, W.H.; Naughton, M.C.; Parsons, G.R. 1992. Benefits transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies. Water Resources Research. 28(3): 675-683.
58. Englin, J.E.; Klan, M.S. 1990. Optimal taxation: timber and externalities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 18: 263-275.
59. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Guidelines for preparing economic analyses. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency. 180 p. [plus appendices].
60. Everest, F.H.; Stouder, D.J.; Kakoyannis, C.; Houston, L.; Stankey, G.; Kline, J.; Alig, R. 2004. A review of scientific information on issues related to use and management of water resources in the Pacific Northwest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-595. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 128 p.
61. Farber, S.C.; Costanza, R.; Wilson, M.A. 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics. 41: 375-392.
62. Floyd, M.F.; Johnson, C.Y. 2002. Coming to terms with environmental justice in outdoor recreation: a conceptual discussion with research implications. Leisure Sciences. 24: 59-77.
63. Freeman, A.M. 2003. The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 491 p.
64. Garber-Yonts, B.E. 2004. The economics of amenities and migration in the Pacific Northwest: a review of selected literature with implications for national forest management. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-617. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 48 p.
65. Gaber-Yonts, B.E. 2005. Conceptualizing and measuring demand for recreation on national forests: a review and synthesis. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-645. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 40 p.
66. Garrod, G.D.; Willis, K.G. 1997. The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: a contingent ranking study. Ecological Economics. 21: 45-61.
67. Giles, R.H. 1978. Wildlife management. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Co. 416 p.
68. Gregory, G.R. 1955. An economic approach to multiple use. Forest Science. 1(1): 6-13,
69. Gregory, R.; Lichtenstein, S.; Slovic, P. 1993. Valuing environmental resources: a constructivist approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 7: 177-197.
70. Gregory, R.; Slovic, P. 1997. A constructive approach to environmental evaluation. Ecological Economics. 21: 175-181.
71. Guisan, A.; Zimmermann, N.E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modeling. 135: 147-186.
72. Haas, G.E. 2003. Restoring dignity to sound professional judgment. Journal of Forestry. 101(6): 38-43.
73. Haight, R.G.; Snyder, S.A.; Revelle, C.S. 2005. Metropolitan open-space protection with uncertain site availability. Conservation Biology. 19: 327-337.
74. Hartman, R. 1976. The harvesting decision when a standing forest has value. Economics Inquiry. 14: 52-58.
75. Hayes, J.L.; Ager, A.A.; Barbour, R.J. 2004. Methods for integrating modeling of landscape change: Interior Northwest Landscape Analysis System. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-610. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 218 p.
76. Haynes, R.W., tech. coord. 2003. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States: 1952 to 2050. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-560. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 254 p.
77. Haynes, R.W. 2005. Developing an agenda to guide forest social science, economics, and utilization research. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-627. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 53 p.
78. Haynes, R.W.; Graham, R.T.; Quigley, T.M., tech. eds. 1996. A framework for ecosystem management in the interior Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-374. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 66 p.
79. Haynes, R.W.; Quigley, T.M. 2001. Broad-scale consequences of land management: Columbia basin example. Forest Ecology and Management. 153(1-3): 179-188.
80. Hof, J. 1993. Coactive forest management. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc. 189 p.
81. Houston, L.L.; Kline, J.D.; Alig, R.J. 2002. Economics research supporting water resource stewardship. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-550. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 72 p.
82. Houston, L.L.; Watanabe, M.; Kline, J.D.; Alig, R.J. 2003. Past and future water use in Pacific Coast States. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-588. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 37 p.
83. Hyberg, B.T.; Holthausen, D.M. 1989. The behavior of nonindustrial private forest landowners. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 19: 1014-1023.
84. Johnson, K.N.; Bettinger, P.; Kline, J.D.; Spies, T.; Lennette, M.; Lettman, G. [In press]. Effects of forest management policies on forest structure, timber production, and socioeconomic conditions in a multi-owner landscape of the Oregon coast range. Ecological Applications. 17(1).
85. Johnston, R.J.; Macnusson, G.; Mazzotta, M.J.; Opaluch, J.J. 2002. Combining economic and ecological indicators to prioritize salt marsh restoration actions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 84(5): 1362-1370.
86. Johnston, R.J.; Swallow, S.K.; Weaver, T.F. 1999. Estimating willingness to pay and resource tradeoffs with different payment mechanisms: an evaluation of a funding guarantee for watershed management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 38: 97-120.
87. Just, R.E.; Hueth, D.L.; Schmitz, A. 1982. Applied welfare economics and public policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 491 p.
88. King, D.M.; Mazzotta, M. 2005. Ecosystem valuation. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service and U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. http:// www.ecosystemvaluation.org/. (March 21, 2005).
89. Kline, J.D. 2003. Characterizing land use change in multidisciplinary landscape-level analyses. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 32(1): 103-115.
90. Kline, J.D. 2004. Issues in evaluating the costs and benefits of fuel treatments to reduce wildfire in the Nation's forests. Res. Note PNW-RN-542. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 26 p.
91. Kline, J.D. 2005. Forest and farmland conservation effects of Oregon's (USA) land use planning program. Environmental Management. 35(4): 368-380.
92. Kline, J.D. 2006. Public demand for preserving local open space. Society and Natural Resources. 19(7): 645-659.
93. Kline, J.D. [In press]. Keeping land in forest. In: Cloughesy, M., ed. Forests, carbon and climate change: a summary of science findings. Portland, OR: Oregon Forest Resources Institute.
94. Kline, J.D.; Alig, R.J. 1999. Does land use planning slow the conversion of forest and farm land? Growth and Change. 30(1): 3-22.
95. Kline, J.D.; Alig, R.J. 2005. Forestland development and private forestry with examples from Oregon. Forest Policy and Economics. 7(5): 709-720.
96. Kline, J.D.; Alig, R.J.; Garber-Yonts, B. 2004a. Forestland social values and open space preservation. Journal of Forestry. 102(8): 39-45.
97. Kline, J.D.; Alig, R.J.; Johnson, R.L. 2000a. Forest owner incentives to protect riparian habitat. Ecological Economics. 33(1): 29-43.
98. Kline, J.D.; Alig, R.J.; Johnson, R.L. 2000b. Fostering the production of nontimber services among forest owners with heterogeneous objectives. Forest Science. 46(2): 302-311.
99. Kline, J.D.; Azuma, D.L.; Alig, R.J. 2004b. Population growth, urban expansion, and private forestry in western Oregon. Forest Science. 50(1): 33-43.
100. Kline, J.D.; Azuma, D.L.; Moses, A. 2003. Modeling the spatially dynamic distribution of humans in the Oregon (USA) Coast Range. Landscape Ecology. 18(4): 347-361.
101. Kline, J.D.; Moses, A.; Alig, R.J. 2001. Integrating urbanization into landscape-level ecological assessments. Ecosystems. 4(1):3-18.
102. Kline, J.D.; Swallow, S.K. 1998. The demand for local access to coastal recreation in southern New England. Coastal Management. 26(3): 177-190.
103. Kline, J.; Wichelns, D. 1994. Using public referendum data to characterize support for purchasing development rights to farmland. Land Economics. 70(2): 223-233.
104. Kline, J.; Wichelns, D. 1996a. Measuring public preferences for the environmental amenities provided by farmland. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 23(4): 421-436.
105. Kline, J.; Wichelns, D. 1996b. Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs. Land Economics. 72(4): 538-549.
106. Kline, J.; Wichelns, D. 1998. Measuring heterogeneous preferences for preserving farmland and open space. Ecological Economics. 26(2): 211-224.
107. Knetch, J.L. 1993. Resource economics: persistent conventions and contrary evidence. In: Adamowicz, W.L.; White, W.; Phillips, W.E., eds. Forestry and the environment: economic perspectives. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB International: 251-261.
108. Krutilla, J.V.; Fisher, A.C. 1975. The economics of natural environments: studies in the valuation of commodity and amenity resources. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 292 p.
109. Kuuluvainen, J.; Karppinen, H.; Ovaskainen, V. 1996. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. Forest Science. 42(3): 300-308.
110. Loomis, J. 2005. Updated outdoor recreation use values on national forests and other public lands. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-658. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 26 p.
111. MacGregor, D.G.; Haynes, R.W. 2005. Integrated research to improve fire management decisionmaking. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-630. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 28 p.
112. Manning, R.; Valliere, W.; Minteer, B. 1999. Values, ethics, and attitudes toward national forest management: an empirical study. Society and Natural Resources. 12(5): 421-436.
113. Max, W.; Lehman, D.E. 1988. A behavioral model of timber supply. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 15: 71-86.
114. Mazzotta, M.J.; Kline, J. 1995. Environmental philosophy and the concept of nonuse value. Land Economics. 71(2): 244-49.
115. McDaniels, T.L.; Roessler, C. 1998. Multiattribute elicitation of wilderness preservation benefits: a constructive approach. Ecological Economics. 27: 299-312.
116. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. 137 p.
117. Mills, J.; Kincaid, J. 1992. The aggregate timberland analysis system - ATLAS: a comprehensive timber projection model. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-281. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 160 p.
118. Nicholson, W. 1985. Microeconomic theory: basic principles and extensions. New York: The Dryden Press. 768 p.
119. Niemi, E.; FiField, A. 2000. Seeing the forests for their green: economic benefits of forest protection, recreation and restoration. Washington, DC: Sierra Club. 30 p.
120. Office of Management and Budget. 1996. Economic analysis of federal regulations under Executive Order 12866. Washington, DC. http://www. whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/riaguide.html. (September 21, 2005).
121. Pagiola, S.; von Ritter, K.; Bishop, J. 2004. How much is an ecosystem worth? Assessing the economic value of conservation. Washington, DC: The World Bank. 33 p.
122. Pattanayak, S.K.; Butry, D.T. 2003. Forest ecosystem services as production inputs. In: Sills, E.O.; Abt, K.L., eds. Forests in a market economy. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 361-378.
123. Peterson, G.L.; Driver, B.L.; Gregory, R., eds. 1988. Amenity resource valuation: integrating economics with other disciplines. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, Inc. 260 p.
124. Peterson, G.L.; Randall, A., eds. 1984. Valuation of wildland resource benefits. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 258 p.
125. Pinchot, G.; Miller, C.; Sample, A. 1998. Breaking new ground. Washington, DC: Island Press. 522 p.
126. Randall, A. 1994. Thinking about the value of biodiversity. In: Kim, K.C.; Weaver, R.D., eds. Biodiversity and landscape: a paradox of humanity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press: 271-286.
127. Rohweder, M.R.; McKetta, C.W.; Riggs, R.A. 2000. Economic and biological compatibility of timber and wildlife production: an illustrative use of production possibilities frontier. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 28(2): 435-447.
128. Rosenberger, R.S.; Loomis, J.B. 2001. Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation use values: a technical document supporting the Forest Service strategic plan (2000 revision). Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-72. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 59 p.
129. Rosenberger, R.S.; Sneh, Y.; Phipps, T.T.; Gurvitch, R. 2005. A spatial analysis of linkages between health care expenditures, physical inactivity, obesity and recreation supply. Journal of Leisure Research. 37(2): 216-235.
130. Ruliffson, J.A.; Haight, R.G.; Gobster, P.H.; Homans, F.R. 2003. Metropolitan natural area protection to maximize public access and species representation. Environmental Science and Policy. 6: 291-299.
131. Scarpa, R.; Buongiorno, J.; Hseu, J.; Abt, K.L. 2000. Assessing the non-timber value of forests: a revealed-preference, hedonic model. Journal of Forest Economics. 6(2): 83-108.
132. Schaberg, R.H.; Holmes, T.P.; Lee, K.J.; Abt, R.C. 1999. Ascribing value to ecological processes: an economic view of environmental change. Forest Ecology and Management. 114: 329-338.
133. Science and Policy Working Group. 2002. The SER primer on ecological restoration. Tucson, AZ: Society for Ecological Restoration International. 9 p. http://www.ser.org/content/ ecological_restoration_primer.asp. (September 28, 2005).
134. Science and Policy Working Group. 2004. Natural capital and ecological restoration. Occasional Paper. Tucson, AZ: Society for Ecological Restoration International. 5 p. http://www.ser.org/content/ Naturalcapital.asp. (September 28, 2005).
135. Sedjo, R.A., ed. 2003. Economics of forestry. Burlington, VT: Ashgate. 477 p.
136. Shields, D.J.; Martin, I.M.; Martin, W.E.; Haefele, M.A. 2002. Survey results of the American public's values, objectives, beliefs, and attitudes regarding forests and grasslands: a technical document supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-95. Fort Collins, CO: U.S.
137. Shindler, B.A; Brunson, M.; Stankey, G.H. 2002. Social acceptability of forest conditions and management practices: a problem analysis. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-537. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 68 p.
138. Sills, E.O.; Abt, K.L., eds. 2003. Forests in a market economy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 379 p.
139. Smith, W.B.; Miles, P.D.; Vissage, J.S.; Pugh, S.A. 2004. Forest resources of the United States, 2002. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-GTR-241. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. 137 p.
140. Snyder, S.; ReVelle, C.; Haight, R. 2004. One- and two-objective approaches to an area-constrained habitat reserve site selection problem. Biological Conservation. 119: 565-574.
141. Spies, T.A.; Johnson, K.N.; Burnett, K.M.; Ohmann, J.L.; McComb, B.C.; Reeves, G.H.; Bettinger, P.; Kline, J.D.; Garber-Yonts, B. [In press]. Cumulative ecological and socio-economic effects of forest policies in coastal Oregon. Ecological Applications. 17(1).
142. Spies, T.A.; Reeves, G.H.; Burnett, K.M.; McComb, W.C.; Johnson, K.N.; Grant, G.; Ohmann, J.L.; Garman, S.L.; Bettinger, P. 2002. Assessing the ecological consequences of forest polices in multi-ownership province in Oregon. In: Liu, J.; Taylor, W.W., eds. Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. New York: Cambridge University Press: 179-207.
143. Stankey, G.H.; Clark, R.N.; Bormann, B.T. 2005. Adaptive management of natural resources: theory, concepts, and management institutions. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-654. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 73 p.
144. Stevens, J.A.; Montgomery, C.A. 2002. Understanding compatibility of multiple uses on forest land: a survey of multiresource research with application to the Pacific Northwest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-539. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 44 p.
145. Strang, W.J. 1983. On the optimal forest harvesting decision. Economic Inquiry. 11: 576-583.
146. Swallow, S.K. 1996. Economic issues in ecosystem management: an introduction and overview. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. 25(2): 83-100.
147. Swallow, S.K.; Parks, P.J.; Wear, D.N. 1990. Policy-relevant nonconvexities in the production of multiple forest benefits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 19: 264-280.
148. Swallow, S.K.; Talukdar, P.; Wear, D.N. 1997. Spatial and temporal specialization in forest ecosystem management under sole ownership. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 79: 311-326.
149. Swallow, S.K.; Wear, D.N. 1993. Spatial interactions in multiple-use forestry and substitution and wealth effects for the single stand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 25: 103-120.
150. Tahvonen, O. 1999. Forest harvesting decisions: the economics of household forest owners in the presence of in situ benefits. Bidiversity and Conservation. 8: 101-117.
151. Tarrant, M.A.; Cordell, H.K.; Green, G.T. 2003. PVF: a scale to measure public values of forests. Journal of Forestry. 101(6): 24-30.
152. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. 2001. 2000 RPA assessment of forest and range lands. FS-687. Washington, DC. 78 p.
153. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. 2004. USDA Forest Service strategic plan for fiscal years 2004-08. FS-810. Washington, DC. 32 p.
154. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. 2005. 100 years of conservation ... for the greatest good. FS-819. Washington, DC. 9 p.
155. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. 2006a. Cooperating across boundaries: partnerships to conserve open space in rural America. Washington, DC. 51 p.
156. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. 2006b. Ecosystem services. Washington, DC. http://www.fs.fed.us/ ecosystemservices/introduction.shtml. (July 14, 2006).
157. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service [USDA FS]. 2002. Strategy for the future. Portland, OR: Pacific Northwest Research Station. 38 p.
158. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service [USDA NRCS]. 2001. 1997 National Resources inventory. Revised 2000 [CD-ROM Version 1]. Washington, DC.
159. U.S. Department of Commerce [USDC], Bureau of the Census. 2000. Historical national population estimates: July 1, 1900 to July 1, 1999. Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/1990s/ popclockest.txt. (August 17, 2005).
160. Vatn, A.; Bromley, D.W. 1995. Choices without prices without apologies. In: Bromley, D.W., ed. Handbook of environmental economics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell: 3-25.
161. Wear, D.N. 2003. Public timber supply under multiple-use management. In: Sills, E.O.; Abt, K.L., eds. Forests in a market economy. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 203-220.
162. Weigand, J.F.; Haynes, R.W. 1996. From rhetoric to reality: the role of restoration in the shift to ecosystem management in national forests. In: Pearson, D.L.; Klimas, C.V., eds. The role of restoration in ecosystem management. Madison, WI: Society for Ecological Restoration: 175-182.
163. Zinkhan, F.C.; Holmes, T.P.; Mercer, D.E. 1997. Conjoint analysis: a preference-based approach for the accounting of multiple benefits in southern forest management. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 21(4): 180-186.