Past and future water use in Pacific Coast States

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report PNW

Volumn , Issue 588, 2003, Pages 1-37

  Houston, Laurie L ^a   Watanabe, Michio ^a   Kline, Jeffrey D ^b   Alig, Ralph J ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Demand; Klamath Basin; Recreation; Water quality; Water quantity

Indexed keywords

SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATER USE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 33646992995     PISSN: 08874840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adams, R.M.; Cho, S.H. 1998. Agricultural and endangered species: an analysis of trade-offs in the Klamath Basin, Oregon. Water Resources Research. 34: 2741-2749.
2. Bachelet, D.; Neilson, R.P.; Lenihan, J.M.; Drapek, R.J. 2001. Climate change effects on vegetation distribution and carbon budget in the United States. Ecosystems. 4: 164-185.
3. Blake, T.A.; Blake, M.G.; Kittredge, W. 2000. Balancing water: restoring the Klamath Basin. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 175 p.
4. Bowker, J.M.; English, D.B.K.; Cordell, H.K. 1999. Projections of outdoor recreation participation. In: Cordell, H.K., principal investigator. Outdoor recreation in American life: a national assessment of demand and supply trends. Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing: 323-351. Chapter 6.
5. Brown, T.C. 1999. Past and future freshwater use in the United States: a technical document supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-39. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 47 p.
6. Burke, S. 2001. The effects of water allocation decisions on crop revenue in the Klamath Reclamation Project. In: Oregon State University and the University of California. Water allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: an assessment of natural resource, economic, social, and institutional issues with a focus on the Upper Klamath Basin. http://eesc.oregonstate.edu/agcomwebfile/edmat/ html/sr/sr1037/sr1037.html. (18 April 2003).
7. California Department of Finance. 1998. Race/ethnic population with age and sex detail, 1970-2040. Sacramento, CA. http://www.dof.ca.gov/HTML/DEMOGRAP/data.htm. (6 March 2002).
8. Committee on Endangered and Threatened Fishes in the Klamath River Basin [CETFKRB]. 2002. Interim report: scientific evaluation of biological opinions on endangered and threatened fishes in the Klamath River Basin. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 24 p.
9. Cooperman, M.S.; Markle, D.F. 2001. Relationship between Lost River and shortnose sucker biology and management of Upper Klamath Lake. In: Oregon State University and the University of California. Water allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: an assessment of natural resource, economic, social, and institutional issues. http://eesc.oregonstate.edu/agcomwebfile/edmat/html/sr/sr1037/sr1037. html. (18 April 2003).
10. Cordell, H.K.; Bergstrom, J.C.; Hartmann, L.A.; English, D.B.K. 1990. An analysis of the outdoor recreation and wilderness situation in the United States, 1989-2040. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-189. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 112 p.
11. Cordell, H.K.; McDonald, B.L.; Teasley, R.J. [and others]. 1999. Outdoor recreation participation trends. In: Cordell, H.K., principal investigator. Outdoor recreation in American life: a national assessment of demand and supply trends. Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing: 219-321. Chapter 5.
12. Eilers, J.; Kann, J.; Cornett, J. [and others]. 2001. Recent paleolimnology of Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Report to U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Falls Office, Klamath Falls, OR.
13. Giannico, G.; Heider, C. 2001. Coho salmon and water management in the Klamath Basin. In: Oregon State University and the University of California. Water allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: an assessment of natural resource, economic, social, and institutional issues. http://eesc.oregonstate.edu/agcomwebfile/edmat/ html/sr/sr1037/sr1037.html. (18 April 2003).
14. Guldin, R.W. 1989. An analysis of the water situation in the United States: 1989-2040. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-GTR-177. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 178 p.
15. Hathaway, R.; Welch, T. 2001. Background. In: Oregon State University and the University of California. Water allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: an assessment of natural resource, economic, social, and institutional issues. http://eesc.oregonstate.edu/ agcomwebfile/edmat/html/sr/sr1037/sr1037.html. (18 April 2003).
16. Hof, J.G.; Kaiser, H.F. 1983. Long-term outdoor recreation participation projections for public land management agencies. Journal of Leisure Research. 15(1): 1-14.
17. Houston, L.L.; Kline, J.D.; Alig, R.J. 2002. Economics research supporting water resource stewardship in the Pacific Northwest. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-550. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 72 p.
18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. 2001. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group 1 to the third assessment report of the IPCC. New York: Cambridge University Press. 881 p.
19. Jaeger, W. 2001. Water allocation alternatives for the Upper Klamath Basin. In: Oregon State University and the University of California. Water allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: an assessment of natural resource, economic, social, and institutional issues. http://eesc.oregonstate.edd/agcomwebfile/edmat/ html/sr/sr1037/sr1037.html. (18 April 2003).
20. Jarvis, R.L. 2001. Effects on waterfowl. In: Oregon State University and the University of California. Water allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: an assessment of natural resource, economic, social, and institutional issues. http://eesc.oregonstate.edu/ agcomwebfile/edmat/html/sr/sr1037/sr1037.html. (18 April 2003).
21. Lach, D.; Richards, L.; Corson, C.; Case, P. 2001. Effects of the 2001 water allocation decisions on project-area communities. In: Oregon State University and the University of California. Water allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: an assessment of natural resource, economic, social, and institutional issues. http://eesc.oregonstate.edu/agcomwebfile/edmat/html/sr/sr1037/ sr1037.html. (18 April 2003).
22. Milstein, M. 2001. Tensions flare over water rights. (Portland Oregonian.) May 6. http://www.oregonlive.com/special/klamath/index.ssf?/news/oregonian/ lc_11klama06.frame. (5 October 2001).
23. Moore, M.R.; Crowhite, W.M.; Hosteler, J.E. 1990. Agricultural water use in the United States, 1950-85. In: Carr, J.E.; Chase, E.B.; Paulson, R.W.; Moody, D.W. National water summary 1987-hydrologic events and water supply use. Water Supply Paper 2350. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey: 93-108.
24. Murray, C.R. 1968. Estimated use of water in the United States, 1965. Circular 556. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey. 53 p.
25. Murray, C.R.; Reeves, E.B. 1972. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1970. Circular 676. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey. 37 p.
26. Murray, C.R.; Reeves, E.B. 1977. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1975. Circular 765. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey. 39 p.
27. National Assessment Synthesis Team. 2001. Climate change impacts on the United States: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. New York: Cambridge University Press. 612 p.
28. National Water Commission. 1973. Water policies for the future: final report to the Congress of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 579 p.
29. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2002. Oregon list of threatened and endangered fish and wildlife species. http://www.dfw.state.or.us/ODFWhtml/Wildlife/t%26e.html. (22 May 2002).
30. Oregon Office of Economic Analysis. 1997. Long-term population and employment forecasts for Oregon components of population change, 1990-2040. Salem, OR. http://www.oea.das.state.or.us/ demographic/longterm/or_sumry.htm. (6 March 2002).
31. Oregon Water Resources Board. 1971. Klamath Basin. Salem, OR. 288 p.
32. Osborn, C.T.; Schefter, J.E.; Shabman, L. 1986. The accuracy of water use forecasts: evaluation and implications. Water Resources Bulletin. 22(1): 101-109.
33. Portland Oregonian. 2001a. Klamath refuges go thirsty: critical wetland for migrating birds are drying up at alarming rates. July 13. http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/oregonian/index.ssf?/ environment/oregonian/lc_61klama13.frame. (19 May 2003).
34. Portland Oregonian. 2001b. Kitzhaber: Columbia could mirror Klamath fight. August 17. http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/xml/story.ssf/ html_standard.xsl?/base/news/9980493323448133.xml. (19 May 2003).
35. Portland Oregonian. 2001c. The ecosystem of the Klamath Basin. August 29. http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/xml/story.ssf/ html_standard.xsl?/base/news/99908617217192308.xml. (19 May 2003).
36. Rykbost, K.A.; Charlton, B.A. 2001. Nutrient loading of surface waters in the Upper Klamath Basin: agricultural and natural sources. Special Report 1023. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. 14 p.
37. Solley, W.B.; Chase, E.B.; Mann, W.B. 1983. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1980. Circular 1001. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey. 50 p.
38. Solley, W.B.; Merk, C.F.; Pierce, R.R. 1988. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1985. Circular 1004. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey. 82 p.
39. Solley, W.B.; Pierce, R.R.; Pearlman, H.A. 1993. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1990. Circular 1081. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey. 76 p.
40. Solley, W.B.; Pierce, R.R.; Pearlman, H.A. 1998. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1995. Circular 1200. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey. 71 p.
41. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 2001. 2000 RPA assessment of forest and range lands. FS-687. Washington, DC. 78 p.
42. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 1999. Census of agriculture 1997 [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC.
43. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service [NRCS]. 2001. National resources inventory [CD-ROM) Version 1. Fort Worth, TX.
44. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1995. Census of agriculture 1992 [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC.
45. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 2000a. Population projections for states by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin, 1995 to 2025. Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/population/projections/state/stpjpop.txt. (6 March 2002).
46. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 2000b. National population projections, annual projections of the total resident population as of July 1, 1999 to 2100. Washington, DC. http://www.census.gov/population/projections/nation/summary/np-t1.txt. (6 March 2002).
47. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. 1992. County projections to 2040 [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC.
48. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2001. Regional accounts data: annual state personal income. Washington, DC. http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/regional/spi/. (19 August 2001).
49. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2002. Regional accounts data: annual state personal income. Washington, DC. http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/regional/reis/. (19 August 2002).
50. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Services [NMFS]. 2001. Biological opinion: ongoing Klamath Project operations. Long Beach, CA. 58 p.
51. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. 1953. Reclamation accomplishments 1905-1953. Klamath Project Oregon-California. Washington, DC. 49 p.
52. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. 1998. Klamath Project Oregon- California. Sacramento, CA: U.S. Government Printing Office. [Pages unknown].
53. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 1992. Biological opinion on effects of long-term operation of the Klamath Project. Klamath Falls, OR. [Pages unknown].
54. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]. 2001. Biological/conference opinion regarding the effects of operation of the Bureau of Reclamation's Klamath Project on the endangered Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus), endangered shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris), threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and proposed critical habitat for the Lost River/shortnose suckers. Klamath Falls, OR. 295 p.
55. Walsh, R.G.; Jon, K.H.; McKean, J.R.; Hof, J. 1992. Effect of price on forecasts of participation in fish and wildlife recreation: an aggregate demand model. Journal of Leisure Research. 21: 140-156.
56. Washington Office of Financial Management. 2001. Forecast of the state population by age and sex, 1990-2030. Olympia, WA. http://www.ofm.wa.gov/popagesex19702020/4CAST00_rev2.xls. (6 March 2002).
57. Water Resources Council. 1968. The Nation's water resources. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. [Pages unknown].
58. Water Resources Council. 1978. The Nation's water resources. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. [Pages unknown].
59. Weber, B.; Sorte, B. 2001. The Upper Klamath Basin economy and the role of agriculture. In: Oregon State University and the University of California. Water allocation in the Klamath Reclamation Project, 2001: an assessment of natural resource, economic, social, and institutional issues. http://eesc.oregonstate.edu/agcomwebfile/ edmat/html/sr/sr1037/sr1037.html. (18 April 2003).
60. Western Regional Climate Center. 2002. Climatological data summaries, Klamath Falls Agricultural Station, Oregon (354511). http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/climsum.html. (19 May 2003).
61. Wollman, N.; Bonem, G.W. 1971. The outlook for water quality, quantity, and national growth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 286 p.