Shifting forest value orientations in the United States, 1980-2001: A computer content analysis

Environmental Values

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 373-392

  Bengston, David N ^a   Webb, Trevor J ^b   Fan, David P ^c  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b Research School of Social Sciences   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aesthetic; Anthropocentric; Biocentric; Content analysis; Forest value orientations; Moral; Spiritual

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; ESTHETICS; PUBLIC ATTITUDE;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 5044226722     PISSN: 09632719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3197/096327104323312734     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Barker, Paul F. 1994. 'Values versus use', Journal of Forestry 92(10): 60.
2. Bengston, D.N. 1994. 'Changing forest values and ecosystem management', Society and Natural Resources 7: 515-33.
3. Bengston, David N., David P. Fan and Doris N. Celarier 1999. 'A new approach to monitoring the social environment for natural resource management and policy: The case of US national forest benefits and values', Journal of Environmental Management 56: 181-93.
4. Blatt, David J.L. 1987. Out of the Closet and Onto the Coast: Aesthetic Zoning as Visual Resources Management, Ocean and Coastal Policy Program, Center for Urban and Regional Studies, CURS Report No. 87-18. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Revised April 1987. 57 pp.
5. Borrie, W.T., W.A. Freimund and M.A. Davenport 2002. 'Winter visitors to Yellowstone National Park: Their value orientations and support for management actions', Human Ecology Review 9(2): 41-8.
6. Bormann, L.H. 1996. An applied analysis of public values and ecosystem integrity for U.S. national forest management. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
7. Bright, Alan D., Michael J. Manfredo and David C. Fulton 2000. 'Segmenting the public: An application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado', Wildlife Society Bulletin 28(1): 218-26.
8. Brown, Gregory and Patrick Reed 2000. 'Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning', Forest Science 46(2): 240-47.
9. Burgess, Jacquelin 1990. 'The production and consumption of environmental meanings in the mass media: A research agenda for the 1990s', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 15(2): 139-61.
10. Clawson, Marion 1979. 'Forests in the long sweep of American history', Science 204 (June 15): 1168-74.
11. Cordell, H. Ken and Michael A. Tarrant 2002. Changing demographics, values, and attitudes', Journal of Forestry 100(7): 28-33.
12. Cortner, H.J. and M.A. Moote 1999. The Politics of Ecosystem Management. Washington, DC: Island Press. 179 pp.
13. Craig, Paul P., Harold Glasser and Willett Kempton 1993. 'Ethics and values in environmental policy: The said and the UNCED', Environmental Values 2(2): 137-58.
14. Creighton, J.L. 1983. 'The use of values: Public participation and the planning process', in G.A. Daneki, M.W. Garcia and J.D. Priscoli (eds) Public Involvement and Social Impact Assessment, pp. 143-61. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
15. Dearing, J.W., E.M. Rogers and S.H. Chaffee 1996. Agenda-Setting (Communication Concepts, Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Dunlap, R.E. 2002. 'An enduring concern: Light stays green for environmental protection', Public Perspective 13(5): 10-14.
17. Dwyer John F. and Gina M. Childs 2004. 'Blurring of distinctions between urban and rural areas, people, issues, and resource management: Implications for landscape change', Landscape and Urban Planning (in press).
18. Egan, A.F. and A.E. Luloff 2000. 'The exurbanization of America's forests: Research in rural social science', Journal of Forestry 98(3): 26-30.
19. Elliott, E., J.L. Regens and B.J. Seldon 1995. 'Exploring variation in public support for environmental protection', Social Science Quarterly 76(1): 41-52.
20. Fan, D.P. 1988. Predictions of Public Opinion from the Mass Media: Computer Content Analysis and Mathematical Modeling. New York: Greenwood Press.
21. Fan, D.P. 1997. 'Computer content analysis of press coverage and prediction of public opinion for the 1995 sovereignty referendum in Quebec', Social Science Computer Review 15(4): 351-66.
22. Fan, David P. and Lois Norem 1992. 'The media and the fate of the Medicare Catastrophic Extension Act', Journal of Health, Politics, Policy and Law 17: 39-70.
23. Fan, David P., Lois Norem and Carol Shaffer 1989. 'Comparison of coverage by different newspapers and wire services: The Bush-Dukakis presidential campaign of 1987-1988', Paper presented at Midwest Association of Public Opinion Research annual conference, Chicago, IL.
24. Farnham, Timothy J., Cameron P. Taylor, and Will Callaway 1995. 'A shift in values: non-commodity resource management and the Forest Service', Policy Studies Journal 23(2): 281-95.
25. Floyd, Donald W. (ed). 1999. Forest of Discord: Options for Governing Our National Forests and Federal Public Lands. Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters. 84 pp.
26. Fulton, D.C., M.J. Manfredo and J. Lipscomb 1996. 'Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach', Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1(2): 24-47.
27. Gamson, W.A. and A. Modigliani 1989. 'Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructivist approach', American Journal of Sociology 95(1): 1-37.
28. Gobster, P.H. 1999. 'An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management', Landscape Journal 18(1): 54-64.
29. Hansis, Richard 1995. 'The social acceptability of clearcutting in the Pacific Northwest', Human Organization 54(1): 95-101.
30. Hays, S.P. 1988. 'The new environmental forest', University of Colorado Law Review 59:517-50.
31. Hirt, P.W. 1994. A Conspiracy of Optimism: Management of the National Forests Since World War Two. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
32. Hooker, Ann M. 1992. 'Beliefs and values regarding society and nature: A framework for listening in forest and environmental policy', Ph.D. dissertation. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
33. Jostad, P.M., L.H. McAvoy and D. McDonald 1996. 'Native American land ethics: Implications for natural resource management', Society and Natural Resources 9(6): 565-81.
34. Kanagy, C.L., C.R. Humphrey and G. Firebaugh 1994. 'Surging environmentalism: Changing public opinion or changing publics?', Social Science Quarterly 75(4): 804-19.
35. Kempton, W., J.S. Boster, and J.A. Hartley 1995. Environmental Values in American Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
36. Kennedy, J.J., M.P. Dombeck and N.E. Koch 1998. 'Values, beliefs and management of public forests in the Western world at the close of the twentieth century', Unasylva 49(1):16-26.
37. Kennedy, J.J. and J.W. Thomas 1995. 'Managing natural resources as social value', in Richard L. Knight and Sarah F. Bates (eds) A New Century for Natural Resource Management, pp. 311-21.
38. Kluckhohn, Clyde 1951. 'Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification', in Talcott Parsons and Edward A. Shils (eds) Toward a General Theory of Action, pp. 388-433. New York: Harper and Row.
39. Kluckhohn, F.R. and F.L. Strodtbeck 1961. Variations in Value Orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Co.
40. Knickerbocker, Brad 1993. 'Clinton plan challenges 'Lords' of US rural west', The Christian Science Monitor, March 3, 1993, Section: The U.S., Page 1.
41. Koch, N.E. and J.J. Kennedy 1991. 'Multiple-use forestry for social values', Ambio 20(7): 330-33.
42. Manning, R., W. Valliere and B. Minteer 1999. 'Values, ethics, and attitudes toward national forest management: An empirical study', Society and Natural Resources 12(5): 421-36.
43. McCombs, M. 2005. Setting the Agenda: The News Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (in press).
44. Minteer, Ben A. and Robert E. Manning 2000. 'Convergence in environmental values: An empirical and conceptual defense', Ethics, Place and Environment 3(1): 47-60.
45. Mitchell, M.Y., J.E. Force, M.S. Carroll and W.J. McLaughlin 1993. 'Forest places of the heart: Incorporating special spaces into public management', Journal of Forestry 91(4): 32-7.
46. Nash, Roderick 2001. Wilderness and the American Mind (Fourth Edition). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47. Norton, Bryan G. and Anne C. Steinemann 2001. 'Environmental values and adaptive management', Environmental Values 10: 473-506.
48. Page, Benjamin I., R.Y. Shapiro and G.R. Dempsey 1987. 'What moves public opinion?', American Political Science Review 81(1): 23-43.
49. Pinchot, G. 1998. Breaking New Ground (Commemorative Edition). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
50. Power, T.M. 1996. Lost Landscapes and Failed Economies: The Search for a Value of Place. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. 304 p.
51. Proctor, James D. 1998. 'Environmental values and popular conflict over environmental management: A comparative analysis of public comments on the Clinton Forest Plan', Environmental Management 22(3): 347-58.
52. Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
53. Sagoff, M. 1991. 'Zuckerman's dilemma: A plea for environmental ethics', Hastings Center Report 21(5): 32-40.
54. Salwen, M.B. 1988. 'Effect of accumulation of coverage on issue salience in agenda-setting', Journalism Quarterly 65: 100-106.
55. Satchell, Michael 1990. 'The endangered logger', U.S. News & World Report 108(25): 27-29. June 25.
56. Satterfield, Theresa 2001. 'In search of value literacy: Suggestions for the elicitation of environmental values', Environmental Values 10(3): 331-59.
57. Schroeder, H.W. 1996. 'Ecology of the heart: Understanding how people experience natural environments', in Alan W. Ewert (ed.) Natural Resource Management: The Human Dimension, pp. 13-27. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
58. Shah, D.V., M.D. Watts, D. Domke and D.P. Fan 2002. 'News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton's public approval in spite of scandal', Public Opinion Quarterly 66: 339-70.
59. Shields, D.J., I.M. Martin, W.E. Martin and M.A. Haefele 2002. Survey Results of the American Public's Values, Objectives, Beliefs, and Attitudes Regarding Forests and Grasslands: A Technical Document Supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-95. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 111 p. (Online: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm).
60. Shindler, B.A., M. Brunson and G.H. Stankey 2002. Social Acceptability of Forest Conditions and Management Practices: A Problem Analysis. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-537. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. (Online: http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/viewpub.jsp?index=3242).
61. Shindler, B. and L.A. Cramer 1999. 'Shifting public values for forest management: Making sense of wicked problems', Western Journal of Applied Forestry 14(1): 28-34.
62. Shindler, B., P. List and B. Steel 1993. 'Managing federal forests: Public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide', Journal of Forestry 91: 36-42.
63. Simon, Scott 2001. 'Michael Dombeck discusses his years as head of the US Forest Service and why he stepped down' National Public Radio, Weekend Edition Saturday, April 28, 2001.
64. Smith, R.D. 1997. 'Letting America speak', Audacity: The Magazine of Business History 5(2): 50-61.
65. Smardon, R.C. 1984. 'When is the pig in the parlor? The interface of aesthetic and legal considerations', Environmental Review 8(2): 146-61.
66. Sonner, S. 1990. 'BLM, Aucoin say owl conservation could trigger recession', The Associated Press May 5, 1990. Section: Washington Dateline.
67. Steel, B., P. List and B. Shindler 1994.'Conflicting values about federal forests: A comparison of national and Oregon publics', Society and Natural Resources 7: 137-53.
68. Steel, B.S. and N.P. Lovrich 1997. 'An introduction to natural resource policy and the environment: Changing paradigms and values', in B.S. Steel (ed.) Public Lands Management in the West, pp. 3-15. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
69. Steel, B.S., N.P. Lovrich and J.C. Pierce 1992-3. 'Trust in natural resource information sources and postmaterialist values: A comparative study of U.S. and Canadian citizens in the Great Lakes area', Journal of Environmental Systems 22(2): 123-36.
70. Steen, H.K. 1991. The Beginning of the National Forest System. Publication FS-488. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service.
71. Stern, P.C., T. Dietz and L. Kalof 1993. 'Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern', Environment and Behavior 25: 322-48.
72. Stewart, Susan I. 2001. 'Amenity migration', in Kim Luft and Sandy MacDonald (compilers) Trends 2000: Shaping the Future, Proceedings of the 5th Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Trends Symposium, Sept. 17-20, 2000, pp. 369-78. East Lansing, MI: Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources, Michigan State University.
73. Tarrant,M.A.,R. Porter and H.K. Cordell 2002.'Sociodemographics, values, and attitudes', in David N. Wear and John G. Greis (eds) Southern Forest Resource Assessment, General Technical Report SRS-53, pp. 175-87. Ashville, NC: USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 635 pp. (Online: http://www.srs.fs.fed.us/sustain/).
74. Tarrant, M.A., H.K. Cordell and G.T. Green 2003. 'PVF: A scale to measure public values of forests', Journal of Forestry 101(6): 24-30.
75. United Press International 1992. 'Conserving American forests a concern since Pilgrim times', United Press International, Domestic News, January 1, 1992.
76. USDI 1990. 'Determination of threatened status for the northern spotted owl; final rule', Federal Register 55: 26114-26194.
77. USDI 1992. 'Determination of critical habitat for the northern spotted owl; final rule', Federal Register 57: 1796-1838.
78. Vaske, J.J., M.P. Donnelly, D.R. Williams and S. Jonker 2001. 'Demographic influences on environmental value orientations and normative beliefs about national forest management', Society and Natural Resources 14(9): 761-76.
79. Vining, J. and E. Tyler 1999.'Values, emotions, and desired outcomes as reflected in public responses to forest management plans', Human Ecology Review 6(1): 21-34.
80. Walker, G.B. and S.E. Daniels 1996. 'The Clinton Administration, the Northwest Forest Conference, and managing conflict: When talk and structure collide', Society and Natural Resources 9(1): 77-91.
81. Wear, D. N. and J. G. Greis (eds) 2002. Southern Forest Resource Assessment. General Technical Report SRS-53. Ashville, NC: USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 635 pp. (Online: http://www.srs.fs.fed.us/sustain/).
82. Williams, Michael 1989. Americans and Their Forests. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
83. Williams, D.R., M.E. Patterson, J.W. Roggenbuck and A.E. Watson 1992. 'Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place', Leisure Sciences 14(1): 29-46.
84. Yankelovich, D. 1991. Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
85. Xu, Z. and D.N. Bengston 1997. 'Trends in national forest values among forestry professionals, environmentalists, and the news media, 1982-1993', Society and Natural Resources 10:43-59.
86. Zimmerman, Michael 1987. 'Spotted owls vs. the timber industry', Christian Science Monitor, Opinion, September 30, 1987, p. 13.