Public demand for preserving local open space

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 645-659

  Kline, Jeffrey D ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Forest and farmland preservation; Wildland urban interface

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; OPEN SPACE; PRESERVATION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33745062524     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920600742419     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Albers, H. J. and A. W. Ando. 2003. Could state-level variation in the number of land trusts make economic sense? Land Econ. 79(3):311-327. [CSA]
2. Alig, R. J., J. D. Kline, and M. Lichtenstein. 2004. Urbanization on the U.S. landscape: Looking ahead in the 21st century. Landscape Urban Plan. 69(2-3):219-234. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
3. Bengston, D. N., J. O. Fletcher, and K. C. Nelson. 2004. Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape Urban Plan. 69(2-3):271-286. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
4. Berry, D. 1976. Preservation of open space and the concept of value. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 35(2):113-123. [CSA]
5. Cordell, H. K., J. C. Bergstrom, C. J. Betz, and G. T. Green. 2004. Dominant socioeconomic forces shaping the future of the United States. In Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge, eds. M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, B. L. Bruyere, D. R. Field, and P. J. Brown, 349-361. Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho.
6. Daniels, T. 2000. Integrated working landscape protection: The case of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Society Nat. Resources 13(3):261-271. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
7. Davis, F. L. and A. H. Wurth, Jr. 2003. Voting preferences and the environment in the American electorate: The discussion extended. Society Nat. Resources 16(8):729-740. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
8. Deacon, R. and P. Shapiro. 1975. Private preference for collective goods revealed through voting on referenda. Am. Econ. Rev. 65(5):943-955. [CSA]
9. DeCoster, L. A. 2000. Proceedings of the Forest Fragmentation 2000 Conference. Alexandria, VA: Sampson Group, Inc.
10. DeHaven-Smith, L. 1988. Environmental belief systems: Public opinion on land use regulation in Florida. Environ. Behav. 20(3):276-299. [CSA]
11. Duke, J. M. and R. Aull-Hyde. 2002. Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecol. Econ. 42(1-2):131-145. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
12. Economic Research Service. 2004. Measuring rurality: Rural-urban continuum codes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Rurality/RuralUrbCon, accessed 17 August 2005.
13. Ewing, R., J. Kostyack, D. Chen, B. Stein, and M. Ernst. 2005. Endangered by sprawl: How runaway development threatens America's wildlife. Washington, DC: National Wildlife Federation, Smart Growth America, and NatureServe.
14. Gobster, P. H. 2004. Introduction: The social aspects of landscape change: Protecting open space under pressure of development. Landscape Urban Plan. 69(2-3):149-151. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
15. Janofsky, M. 2003. In towns that slowed growth, backlash stirs. New York Times, February 9, p. 20. [CSA]
16. Kahn, M. E. and J. G. Matsusaka. 1997. Demand for environmental goods: Evidence from voting patterns on California initiatives. J. Law Econ. 40(1):137-173. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
17. Kaplan, R. and M. E. Austin. 2004. Out in the country: Sprawl and the quest for nature nearby. Landscape Urban Plan. 69(2-3):235-243. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
18. KAG [Keep America Growing]. 1999. Keep America growing: Balancing working lands and development: Conference proceedings (CD ROM). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
19. Kline, J. and D. Wichelns. 1994. Using referendum data to characterize public support for purchasing development rights to farmland. Land Econ. 70(2):223-233. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
20. Kline, J. and D. Wichelns. 1996. Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs. Land Econ. 72(4):538-549. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
21. Kline, J. D. and D. Wichelns. 1998. Measuring heterogeneous preferences for preserving farmland and open space. Ecol. Econ. 26(2):211-224. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
22. Mohai, P. 1992. Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society Nat. Resources 5(1):1-19. [CSA]
23. Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2001. 1997 National Resources Inventory (rev. December 2000). CD-ROM version 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.
24. Parisi, D., M. Taquino, S. M. Grice, and D. A. Gill. 2004. Civic responsibility and the environment: Linking local conditions to community environmental activeness. Society Nat. Resources 17(2):97-112. [CSA]
25. Pew Center for Civic Journalism. 2000. Straight talk from Americans 2000: A national survey for the Pew Center for Civic Journalism conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates. College Park, MD: Pew Center for Civic Journalism.
26. Press, D. 2003. Who votes for natural resources in California? Society Nat. Resources 16(9):835-846. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
27. Roe, B., E. G. Irwin, and H. A. Morrow-Jones. 2004. The effect of farmland, farmland preservation, and other neighborhood amenities on housing values and residential growth. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 80(1):55-75. [CSA]
28. Rosenberger, R. S. 1998. Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs: Comment. Land Econ. 74(4):557-565. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
29. Salka, W. M. 2003. Determinants of countywide voting behavior on environmental ballot measures: 1990-2000. Rural Sociol. 68(2):253-277. [CSA]
30. Sampson, N. and L. DeCoster. 2000. Forest fragmentation: Implications for sustainable private forests. J. For. 98(3):4-8. [CSA]
31. Sell, J. L. and E. H. Zube. 1986. Perception of and response to environmental change. J. Architect. Plan. Res. 3(1):33-54. [CSA]
32. Solecki, W. D., R. J. Mason, and S. Martin. 2004. The geography of support for open-space initiatives: A case study of New Jersey's 1998 ballot measure. Soc. Sci. Q. 85(3):624-639. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
33. Sorensen, A. A., R. P. Greene, and K. Russ. 1997. Farming on the edge. DeKalb, IL: American Farmland Trust, Center for Agriculture and the Environment, Northern Illinois University.
34. Stein, S. M., R. E. McRoberts, R. J. Alig, M. D. Nelson, D. M. Theobald, M. Eley, M. Dechter, and M. Carr. 2005. Forests on the edge: Housing development on America's private forests. PNW-GTR-636. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
35. Tremblay, K. R. and R. E. Dunlap. 1978. Rural residence and concern with environmental quality: A replication and extension. Rural Sociol. 43(3):474-491. [CSA]
36. Trust for Public Land. 2005. LandVote database. Boston: Trust for Public Land. http://www.tpl.org/ tier3_cdl.cfm?content_item_id=15266&folder_id=2607, accessed 17 August 2005.
37. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2000a. Historical national population estimates: July 1, 1900 to July 1, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/1990s/ popclockest.txt, accessed 17 August 2005.
38. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2000b. United States census 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. http://www.census.gov/main/www/ cen2000.html, accessed 17 August 2005.
39. USDA Forest Service. 2000. Managing the impact of wildfires on communities and the environment: A report to the President in response to the wildfires of 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
40. USDA Forest Service. 2006. Cooperating across boundaries: Partnerships to conserve open space in rural America. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
41. Vaske, J. J. and M. P. Donnelly. 1999. A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society Nat. Resources 12(6):523-537. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
42. Vogt, C. A. and R. W. Marans. 2003. Natural resources and open space in the residential decision process: A study of recent movers to fringe counties in southeast Michigan. Landscape Urban Plan. 69(2-3):255-269. [CSA]
43. Wolfram, G. 1981. The sale of development rights and zoning in the preservation of open space: Lindahl equilibrium and a case study. Land Econ. 57(3):398-413. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
44. Wu, J. and W. G.Boggess. 1999. The optimal allocation of conservation funds. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 38(3):302-321. [CSA] [CROSSREF]