Attitudes toward ecosystem management in the united states, 1992-1998

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 471-487

  Bengston, David N ^a   Xu, George ^b   Fan, David P ^c  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Computer coded; Content analysis; Ecosystem management; News media

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTALISM; PUBLIC ATTITUDE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034921334     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920120207     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bengston, D. N., and D. P. Fan. 2000. Monitoring the social environment for forest policy using the InfoTrend computer content analysis method. In Applications of computer-aided text analysis in natural resources, ed. D. N. Bengston, 34-42. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-211. St. Paul, MN: USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station.
2. Bormann, L. H. 1996.An applied analysis of public values and ecosystem integrity for U.S. National Forest management.Doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
3. Brown, G., and C. C. Harris. 2000. The U.S. Forest Service: Whither the new resource management paradigm?J. Environ. Manage.58(1):1 -19.
4. Brown, R. S., and K. Marshall. 1996. Ecosystem management in state governments.Ecol. Appl.6(3):721-723.
5. Brunson, M. W. 1996a. A definition of “social acceptability” in ecosystem management. InDefining social acceptability in ecosystem management: A workshop proceedings, tech. eds. M. W. Brunson, L. E. Kruger, C. B. Tyler, and S. A. Schroeder, 7-16. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-369. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
6. Brunson, M. W. 1996b. The social context of ecosystem management: Unanswered questions and unresolved issues. InDefining social acceptability in ecosystem management: A workshop proceedings, tech. eds. M. W. Brunson, L. E. Kruger, C. B. Tyler, and S. A. Schroeder, 113 - 126. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-369. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
7. Brunson, M. W., and D. K. Reiter. 1996. Effects of ecological information on judgments about scenic impacts of timber harvest.J. Environ. Manage.46(1):31 -41.
8. Brunson, M., and B. Shelby. 1992. Assessing recreational and scenic quality: How does New Forestry rate?J. For.90(7):37-41
9. Brunson, M. W., D. T. Yarrow, S. D. Roberts, D. C. Guynn, Jr., and M. R. Kuhns. 1996. Nonindustrial private forest owners and ecosystem management: Can they work together?J. For.94(6):14-21.
10. Caldwell, L. K. 1968. An ecosystems approach to public land policy. InPublic land policy: Proceedings of the Western Resources Conference, ed. P. O. Foss, 43-56. Boulder, CO: Colorado Associated University Press.
11. Caldwell, L. K. 1970. The ecosystem as a criterion for public land policy.Nat. Resource J.10(2):203-221.
12. Cortner, H. J., and M. A. Moote. 1999.The politics of ecosystem management.Washington, DC: Island Press.
13. Daniels, S. E., and G. B. Walker. 1996. Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management.Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.16(2):71 -102.
14. Dearing, J. W., and E. M. Rogers. 1996.Communications concepts 6: Agenda-setting.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Dombeck, M. P. 1996. Thinking like a mountain: BLM’s approach to ecosystem management. Ecol. Appl.6(3):699-702.
16. Downs, A. 1972. Up and down with ecology-The “issue attention cycle.”Public Interest28:38-50.
17. Fan, D. P. 1993. Quantitative estimates for the effects of AIDS public education on HIV infections.Int. J. Bio-Med. Comput.33:157 -177.
18. Fan, D. P. 1988.Predictions of public opinion from the mass media: Computer content analysis and mathematical modeling.New York: Greenwood Press.
19. Flader, S. 1994. Aldo Leopold and the evolution of ecosystem management. InSustainable ecological systems: Implementing an ecological approach to land management, tech. coords. W. W. Covington and L. F. DeBano, 15 - 19. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-247. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
20. Force, J. E., and G. E. Machlis. 1997. The human ecosystem part II: Social indicators in ecosystem management.Society Nat. Resources10:369-382.
21. FEMAT. 1993.Forest ecosystem management: An ecological, economic, and social assessment. Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team, July. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22. Gerlach, L. P., and D. N. Bengston. 1994. If ecosystem management is the solution, what’s the problem?J. For.92(8):18-21.
23. Gongla-Coppinger, L., ed. 1998.1998 LEXIS-NEXIS directory of online services.Dayton, OH: LEXIS-NEXIS (a division of Reed Elsevier).
24. Grumbine, R. E. 1994. What is ecosystem management?Conserv. Biol.8(1):27-38.
25. Grumbine, R. E. 1997. Reflections on “What is ecosystem management?”Conserv. Biol.11(1): 41-47.
26. Hammond, B. 1994. Forest Service values poll questions: Results and analysis. Report prepared for the USDA Forest Service by Kaset International, Tampa, FL.
27. Harwood Group. 1996. A way of life: Great Plains citizens talk about ecosystems. A Harwood Group Public Issues Landscape Report, prepared for the Great Plains Partnership. Bethesda, MD: Harwood Group.
28. Hirt, P. W. 1994.A conspiracy of optimism: Management of the national forests since World War Two.Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
29. Jacobson, S. K., and S. B. Marynowski. 1997. Public attitudes and knowledge about ecosystem management on Department of Defense land in Florida.Conserv. Biol.11(3):770-781.
30. Johnson, R. L., M. W. Brunson, and T. Kimura. 1994. Using image-capture technology to assess scenic value at the urban/forest interface: A case study.J. Environ. Manage.40(2): 183-195.
31. Jones, J. R., R. Martin, and E. T. Bartlett. 1995. Ecosystem management: The U.S. Forest Service’s response to social conflict.Society Nat. Resources8(2):161-168.
32. Kempton, W., J. S. Boster, and J. A. Hartley. 1995.Environmental values in American culture.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Kennamer, J. D., ed. 1994.Public opinion, the press, and public policy.Westport, CT: Praeger.
34. Kennedy, J. J., and T. M. Quigley. 1998. Evolution of USDA Forest Service organizational culture and adaptation issues in embracing an ecosystem management paradigm.Landscape Urban Plan.40:113-122.
35. Lackey, R. T. 1998. Seven pillars of ecosystem management.Landscape Urban Plan.40(1/3): 21-30.
36. Ladd, E. C., and K. H. Bowman. 1995. Attitudes toward the environment: Twenty-five years after Earth Day. American Enterprise Institute, Special Studies in Public Opinion. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
37. Manning, R., W. Valliere, and B. Minteer. 1999. Values, ethics and attitudes toward national forest management: An empirical study.Society Nat. Resources12:421-436.
38. Mason, R. J. 1992.Contested lands: Conflict and compromise in New Jersey’s pine barrens.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
39. More, T. A. 1996. Forestry’s fuzzy concepts: An examination of ecosystem management.J. For.94(8):19-23.
40. Morrissey, W. A., J. A. Zinn, and M. L. Corn, compilers. 1994.Ecosystem management: Federal agency activities.CRS Report for Congress, 94-339 ENR. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
41. Reading, R. P., T. W. Clark, and S. R. Kellert. 1994. Attitudes and knowledge of people living in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.Society Nat. Resources7(4):349-365.
42. Rickenbach, M. G., D. B. Kittredge, D. Dennis, and T. Stevens. 1998. Ecosystem management: Capturing the concept for woodland owners.J. For.96(4):18-24.
43. Robertson, F. D. 1992. Ecosystem management of the national forests and grasslands (memo). USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, 4 June.
44. Selin, S. W., M. A. Schuett, and D. S. Carr. 1997. Has collaborative planning taken root in the national forests?J. For.95(5):25-28.
45. Shindler, B. 1997. Citizen values and participation in the Tongass National Forest debate. InPublic lands management in the West: Citizens, interest groups, and values, ed. B. S. Steel, 165-172. Westport, CT: Praeger.
46. Shindler, B., P. List, and B. Steel. 1993. Managing federal forests: Public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide.J. For.91:36-42.
47. Shindler, B., B. Steel, and P. List. 1996. Public judgments of adaptive management: A response from forest communities.J. For.94(6):4-12.
48. Solecki, W. D. 1998. Local attitudes on regional ecosystem management: A study of New Jersey Pinelands residents.Society Nat. Resources11(5):441-463.
49. Steel, B., P. List, and B. Shindler. 1994. Conflicting values about federal forests: A comparison of national and Oregon publics.Society Nat. Resources7:137-153.
50. Steel, B., B. Shindler, and M. Brunson. 1998. Social acceptability of ecosystem management in the Pacific Northwest. InEcosystems management: A social science perspective, eds. D. L. Soden, B. L. Lamb, and J. R. Tennert, 147-160. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
51. Tarrant, M. A., C. Overdevest, A. D. Bright, H. K. Cordell, and D. B. K. English. 1997. The effect of persuasive communication strategies on rural resident attitudes toward ecosystem management.Society Nat. Resources10(6):537-550.
52. Thomas, J. W. 1996. Forest Service perspective on ecosystem management.Ecol. Appl.6(3): 703-705.
53. van Dyne, G. M., ed. 1969.The ecosystem concept in natural resource management.New York: Academic Press.
54. Walker, G. B., and S. E. Daniels. 1996. The Clinton Administration, the Northwest Forest Conference, and managing conflict: When talk and structure collide.Society Nat. Resources9(1):77-91.
55. West, M. D., ed. 2001.Applications of computer content analysis.Wesport, CT: Ablex.
56. Xu, Z., and D. N. Bengston. 1997. Trends in national forest values among forestry professionals, environmentalists, and the news media, 1982-1993.Society Nat. Resources10:43-59.