The 1993 timber assessment market model: Structure, projections, and policy simulations

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report PNW

Volumn PNW_GTR, Issue 368, 1996, Pages

  Adams, Darius M ^a   Haynes, Richard W ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Demand; Forest sector models; Prices; RPA; Supply; Timber supply

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243118855     PISSN: 08874840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adams, D.M.; Binkley, C.S.; Cardellichio, P.A. 1991. Is the level of National Forest timber harvest sensitive to price? Land Economics. 67(1): 74-84.
2. Adams, D.M.; Boyd, R.; Angle, J. 1992. Evaluating the stability of softwood lumber demand elasticity by end-use sector: a stochastic parameter approach. Forest Science. 36(4): 825-841.
3. Adams, D.M.; Haynes, R.W. 1980. The 1980 softwood timber assessment market model: structure, projections, and policy simulations. Forest Science Monographs. 26(3): 22.
4. Adams, D.M.; Haynes, R.W. 1989. A model of National Forest timber supply and stumpage markets in the western United States. Forest Science. 35(2): 401-424.
5. Binkley, C.S.; Cardellichio, P.A. 1986. Economic projections of hardwood lumber and timber markets. In: Robertson, D., coord. Eastern hardwoods: the resource, the industry, and the markets: Proceedings of a Forest Products Research Society conference; 1985 September 9-11; [Meeting location unknown]. Madison, WI: Forest Products Research Society: 19-30.
6. Brooks, D.J. 1987. Issues in trade modeling: aggregation of products. In: Cardellichio, P.A.; Adams, D.M.; Haynes, R.W., eds. Forest sector and trade models: theory and applications: Proceedings of an international symposium; 1987 November 3-4; [Seattle]. Seattle: Center for International Trade in Forest Products, University of Washington, College of Forest Resources: 111-120.
7. Brooks, D.J.; Kincaid, J. 1987. REACTT: an algorithm for solving spatial equilibrium problems. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-204. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 37 p.
8. Cardellichio, P.A.; Kirjasniemi, M. 1987. Modeling production behavior in forest sector models. In: Kallio, M.; Dykstra, D.P.; Binkley, C.S., eds. The global forest sector: an analytical perspective. [New York]: John Wiley and Sons. 703 p.
9. Cardellichio, P.A.; Youn, Y.C.; Adams, D.M.; Joo, R.W.; Chmelik, J.T. 1989. A preliminary analysis of timber and timber products production, consumption, trade, and prices in the Pacific Rim until 2000. CINTRAFOR Working Pap. 22: Seattle: University of Washington, Center for International Trade in Forest Products. 135 p.
10. Cardellichio, P.A.; Youn, Y.C.; Binkley, S.; Vincent, J.R; Adams, D.M. 1988. An economic analysis of short-run timber supply around the globe. CINTRAFOR Working Pap. 18: Seattle: University of Washington, Center for International Trade in Forest Products. 153 p.
11. Chambers, R.G. 1988. Applied production analysis, a dual approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 331 p.
12. Government of British Columbia. 1994. Working in partnership, British Columbia's forest renewal plan. Victoria, BC: Queen's Printer. 3 p.
13. Greene, J.L.; Siegel, W.C. 1994. The status and impact of state and local regulations on private timber supply. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-255. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 22 p.
14. Haynes, R.W. 1990. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States: 1989-2040. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-199. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 286 p.
15. Haynes, R.W.; Adams, D.M. 1985. Simulation of the effects of alternative assumptions on demand-supply determinants on the timber situation in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Resources Economics Research. 113 p.
16. Haynes, R.W.; Adams, D.M.; Mills, J.R. 1995. The 1993 RPA timber assessment update. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-259. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 66 p.
17. Ince, P. 1994. Recycling and long-range timber outlook: Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-242. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 23 p.
18. Johnson, K.N.; Scheurman, H.L. 1977. Techniques for prescribing optimal timber harvest and investment under different objectives. Forest Science Monograph 18. 27 p.
19. Luppold, W.G.; Dempsey, G.P. 1989. New estimates of central and eastern hardwood lumber production. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 6(3): 120-123.
20. Martin, L.J. 1981. Quadratic single and multi-commodity models of spatial equilibrium: a simplified exposition. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 29(1): 21-48.
21. Messmer, M.; Booth, D. 1993. An economic timber supply analysis for Ontario. Working Pap. Ottawa, Canada: Forestry Canada, Policy and Economics Directorate, Economics Studies Division. 24 p.
22. Mills, J.; Kincaid, J. 1992. The aggregate timberland assessment system - ATLAS: a comprehensive timber projection model. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-281. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 160 p.
23. Ovaskainen, V. 1992. Forest taxation, timber supply, and economic efficiency. Acta Forestalia Fennica 233. 89 p.
24. Perez-Garcia, J.M. 1992. Global trade model linkages to environmental impacts, In: Adams, D.; Haynes, R.; Lippke, B.; Perez-Garcia, J., comps. Forest sector, trade and environmental impact models: theory and application: Proceedings of an international symposium; 1992 April 30-May 1; [Seattle]. Seattle: Center for International Trade in Forest Products, University of Washington. 237 p.
25. Powell, D.S.; Faulkner, J.L.; Darr, D.R.; Zhu, Z.; MacCleery, D.W. 1993. Forest resources of the United States, 1992. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-234. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 132 p.
26. Reed, L. 1993. The paradox of a timber supply deficit in British Columbia. British Columbia Report Magazine. August. 5 p.
27. Spelter, H. 1984. Price elasticities for softwood plywood and structural particleboard in the United States. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 14: 528-535.
28. Spelter, H. 1985. A product diffusion approach to modeling softwood lumber demand. Forest Science. 31(3): 685-700.
29. Spelter, H. 1992. Technology-driven substitution in the forest sector: the variable price elasticity model revisited. In: Lönnstedt, Lars, ed. Forest sector analysis: Proceedings of P06.02 FORESEA, IUFRO centennial; 1992 August 4-September 30; Berlin, Germany. Uppsala, Sweden: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Forest-Industry-Market Studies: 24-29.
30. Takayama, T.; Judge, G.G. 1971. Spatial and temporal price and allocation models. Amersterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.
31. U.S. Department Agriculture, Forest Service. 1982. An analysis of the timber situation in the United States, 1952-2030. Forest Resource Rep. 23. Washington, DC. 499 p.
32. Williams, D.H. 1991. The price responsive timber supply model (PRTSM): concepts and structure. Working Pap. Ottawa, Canada: Forestry Canada, Policy and Economics Directorate, Economics Studies Division. 24 p.