Virtual study groups: A challenging centerpiece for "Working adult" management education

Teaching and Learning with Virtual Teams

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 131-157

  Northcraft, Gregory B ^a   Griffith, Terri L ^b   Fuller, Mark A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846562794     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-708-9.ch006     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Alge, B. J., Wiethoff, C., & Klein, H. J. (2003). When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 26-37.
2. Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology, technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information with the R&D organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Armstrong, D. J., & Cole, P. (2002). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 167-186). Cambridge: MIT
4. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
5. Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based MBA program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369-1397
6. Brass, D. J. (1992). Power in organizations: A social network perspective. In G. Moore and J. A. Whitt (Eds.), Research in politics and society (pp. 295-323). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
7. Brewer, M. B., & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes: East African evidence. New York: Halstead Press (Sage).
8. Broad, W. J. (1981). The publishing game: Getting more for less. Science, 211, 1137-1138.
9. Burke, K., Aytes, K., & Chidambaram, L. (2001). Media effects on the development of cohesion and process satisfaction in computer-supported workgroups: An analysis from two longitudinal studies. Information Technology and People, 14, 122-141.
10. Burke, K., & Chidambaram, L. (1999). How much bandwidth is enough? A longitudinal examination of media characteristics and group outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 23, 557-579.
11. Byrne, D. (1961). The influence of propinquity and opportunities for interaction on classroom relationships, Human Relations, 14, 63-69.
12. Byrne, J. A. (1995). Business Week guide to the best business schools. Business Week. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153-170.
14. Chapman, A. J., Sheehy, N. P., Heywood, S., Dooley, B., & Collins, S. C. (1995). The organizational implications of teleworking. In I. T. Robertson (Ed.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology, (Vol. 10, pp. 229-248). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
15. Chen, G., Donahue, L. M., & Klimoski, R. J. (2004). Training undergraduates to work in organizational teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 27-40.
16. Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20, 143-165.
17. Cohen S. G., & Bailey D.E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
18. Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346-371.
19. Cramton, C. D. (2002). Attribution in distributed work groups. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 191-212). Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Cross, R., & Sproull, L. (2004). More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge, Organization Science, 15, 446-462.
21. Cruz, M. G., Henningsen, D. D., & Williams, M. L. M. (1996). Normative influence in the absence of groups? Consequences for decisions, task difficulty, task attractiveness, decision quality, and conformity. Retrieved December 28, 2002, from http://www.public.asu.edu/~corman/infosys/papers/cruz.pdf
22. DeSanctis, G., Poole, M. S., & Dickson, G. W. (2000). Teams and technology: Interactions over time. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & T. L. Griffith (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams: Technology (Vol. 3). Stamford, CT: JAI.
23. Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation (pp. 275-319). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska.
24. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness, Small Group Research, 30, 678-711.
25. Earley, P. C., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 26-49.
26. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
27. Graetz, K. A., Boyle, E. S., Kimble, C. E., Thompson, P., & Garloch, J. L. (1998). Information sharing in face-to-face, teleconferencing, and electronic chat groups. Small Group Research, 29, 714-743.
28. Griffith, T. L., Mannix, E. A., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Conflict in virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work (pp. 335-352). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Griffith, T. L., & Neale, M. A. (2001). Information Processing in Traditional, Hybrid, and Virtual Teams: From Nascent Knowledge to Transactive Memory. In B. M. Staw & R. I. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 23, pp. 379-421). Stamford, CT: JAI.
30. Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27, 265-287.
31. Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the "team" label. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 171-214). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
32. Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 75-96.
33. Hinds, P., & Bailey, D. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14, 615-632.
34. Hoag, A. M., Jayakar, K. P., & Erickson, K. (2003, Winter). The role of trust in virtual and interpersonal environments: Implications for team learning and case method pedagogies. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 370-383.
35. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1984). Social identify and conformity: A theory of referent information influence. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Current Issues in European Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp.139-182). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
36. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23, 193-219.
37. Huws, U. (1993). Teleworking in Britain (Report #18), London: The Employment Department Research Series.
38. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 29-64.
39. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
40. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Leading the cooperative school (2nd ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
41. Johnson, S. D., Suriya, C., Yoon, S. W., Berrett, J. V., & LaFleur, J. (2002). Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams. Computers and Education, 29, 379-393.
42. Kinsman, F. (1987). The telecommuters. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
43. Kramer, R., & Brewer, M. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1944-1057.
44. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and fault lines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325-340.
45. Lawler, E. E. (1999). Employee involvement makes a difference. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 22, 18-20.
46. Lee, Y., & Ottati, V. (1993). Determinants of in-group and out-group perceptions of heterogeneity: An investigation of Sino-American stereotypes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 298-318.
47. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
48. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Sanders, M. M. (1997). Designing effective learning systems for management education: Student roles, requisite variety, and practicing what we teach. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1334-1368.
49. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24, 569-600.
50. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. E. (1994). Group interacting with technologies: Ideas, evidence, issues, and agenda. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Michaelson, L. K., Jones, C. F., & Watson, W. E. (1993). Beyond groups and cooperation: Building high performance learning teams. In D. L. Wright & J. P. Lunde (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 127-145). Stillwater, OK: New Forums.
52. Moreland, R. L. (2000). Transactive Memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. Thompson, D. Messick, & J. Levine (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: the management of knowledge (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Mugny, G., Sanchez-Mazas, M., Roux, P., & Perez, J.A. (1991). Independence and interdependence of group judgments: Xenophobia and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 213-223.
54. O'Neil, H. F., Allerd, K., & Baker, E. L. (1997). Review of workforce readiness theoretical frameworks. In H. F. O'Neil (Ed.) Workforce readiness: Competencies and assessment (pp. 3-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Ramsower, R. M. (1985). Telecommuting: The organizational and behavioral effects of working at home. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research.
56. Richter, J., & Meshulam, I. (1993). Telework at home: The home and the organization perspective. Human Systems Management, 12, 193-204.
57. Rock, K. W., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). Where do we go from here? On the relationship between identification and employee dispersion patterns. In G. Soenen & B. Moingeon (Eds.), Organizational identities: An integrative perspective (pp. 51-71). London: Routledge.
58. Rockmann, K. W., & Northcraft, G. B. (2005). The ethical implications of virtual interaction. In A. Tenbrunsel, E. Mannix, & M. Neale (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams, 7 (in press).
59. Rockmann, K., Pratt, M. G., & Northcraft, G. B. (2004). Overcoming multiple subgroups in distributed teams: The impact of subgroup alignment and communication media on team identification and expertise recognition. Working paper. University of Illinois.
60. Schmuck, R. A., & Schmuck, P. A. (1997). Group processes in the classroom (7th ed.). Chicago: Brown & Benchmark.
61. Schneider, S. K., & Northcraft, G. B. (1999). Three social dilemmas in managing the diverse organization: A social identity perspective. Human Relations, 52, 1445-1467.
62. Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O'Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412-438.
63. Solomon, N. A., & Templer, A. J. (1993). Development of non-traditional work sites: The challenge of telecommuting. The Journal of Management Development, 12, 21-33.
64. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
65. Starbuck, W. H., & Milliken, F. J. (1988). Executives' perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In D.C. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
66. Stevens, M. A., & Campion, M. J. (1994). The knowledge, skills, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20, 503-530.
67. Stunkel, K. R. (1998). Point of view. Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, A52.
68. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
69. Warkentin, M. F., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-to-face teams: An exploratory study of a Web-based conference system. Decision Science, 28, 975-996.
70. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
71. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.