The role of trust in virtual and interpersonal environments: Implications for team learning & case method pedagogies

Journalism and Mass Communication Educator

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 370-383

  Hoag, Anne M ^a   Jayakar, Krishna P ^b   Erickson, Kimberly ^c  

^a Department of Telecommunications ^*  (United States)

^b Program of Industrial Organizational Psychology   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898321634     PISSN: 10776958     EISSN: 21614326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107769580205700406     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. S. Webber and R. Boggs, U.S. Higher Education IT Spending and the ELearning Effect, 2000-2005 (Framingham, MA: International Data Corporation, 2001).
2. C. R. Wolfe, Learning and Teaching on the World Wide Web (San Diego: Academic Press, 2000).
3. M. W. Shelton, D. R. Lane and E. S. Waldhard, “A Review and Assessment of National Educational Trends in Communication Instruction,” Communication Education, 48, (1999): 228-37.
4. M. G. Moore, cited in R Jarvis, J. Holford and C. Griffin, The Theory and Practice of Learning. (Kogan Page: London, 1998), 105-6.
5. M. G. Moore and G. Kearsley, Distance Education: A Systems View (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1996): 21.
6. T. L. Russell, The No Significant Difference Phenomenon (Birmingham, AL: IDECC, 2001).
7. S. R. Hiltz and B. Wellman, “Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom," Communications of the ACM 40(9) (1997): 44-9.
8. B. W. Brown and C. E. Liedholm, “Can Web Courses Replace the Classroom in Principles of Microeconomics?” American Economic Review 92(2) (May 2002): 444-8
9. L. M. Manning and C. A. Riordan, “Using Groupware Software to Support Collaborative Learning in Economics "Journal of Economic Education, 31 (3) (2000): 244-52
10. S. R. Feather, “The Impact of Group Support Systems on Collaborative Learning Groups’ Stages of Development” Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 17 (2) (1999): 23-34.
11. Hiltz and Wellman, “Asynchronous learning networks," 44-9.
12. A. M. Hoag and T. F. Baldwin, “Using Case Method and Experts in Inter-University Electronic Learning Teams” Educational Technology & Society 3(31 (2000): 337-48.
13. Arbaugh, “Virtual Classroom versus Physical Classroom: An Exploratory Study of Class Discussion Patterns and Student Learning in an Asynchronous Internet-based MBA Course” Journal of Management Education, 24(2) (2000): 213-33.
14. For examples see, Hoag and Baldwin, “Using Case Method,” 337-48; M. Alavi, “Computer-mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation," MIS Quarterly 19(2) (1996): 159-74
15. D. P. Brandon and A. B. Hollingshead, “Collaborative Learning and Computer-Supported Groups,” Communication Education 48 (1999): 109-26
16. I. Mulder, J. Swaak and J. Kessels, “Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology-mediate d interaction, ” Educational Technology & Society 5(1) (2002): 35-47.
17. T. W. Porter and B. S. Lilly, “The effects of conflict, trust, and task commitment on project team performance, ” International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(4) (1996): 361-76
18. K. T. Dirks, “The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 84{3) (1999):445-55
19. D. Meyerson, K. E. Weick and R. M. Kramer, “Swift trust and temporary groups,” in R. M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (eds.) Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1996): 166-95.
20. S. L. Jarvenpaa, K. Knoll, and D. E Leidner, “Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(A) (1998): 29-64.
21. R. C. Mayer, J. H. Davis and F. D. Schoorman, An integrative model of organizational trust,” Academy of Management Review, 20(3) (1995): 712.
22. R. L. Oliver, “A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17, (1980): 460-69.
23. L. Sproull and S. Kiesler, Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991).
24. J. Short, E. Williams and B. Christie, The social psychology of telecommunications. (New York: Wiley, 1976).
25. R. L. Daft and R. H. Lengel, “Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design,” Management Science, 32{5) (1986), 554-71.
26. J. R. Carlson and R. W. Zmud, “Channel expansion theory and the experimental nature of media richness perceptions,” Academy of Management Journal, 42[2) (1999), 153-70.
27. D. T. Campbell and J. C. Stanley, Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1963).
28. A. M. Hoag, D. J. Brickley and J.M. Cawley, “The Case Method in Media Management Education,” Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 55{4) (2001): 49-59.
29. T. L. Russell, The No Significant Difference Phenomenon.
30. Adapted from Mathieu, J. E., & Marks, M.,““Developing a measure of team orientation: scale construction, reliability, and validity.” Unpublished manuscript (1989).