Feature binding and episodic retrieval in blindness for congruent stimuli: Evidence from analyses of sequential congruency

Psychological Research

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 30-41

  Oriet, Chris ^a   Stevanovski, Biljana ^b   Jolicœur, Pierre ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COGNITION; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; GOALS; HUMANS; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33846397381     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-005-0034-2     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Allport, D. A., Tipper, S. P., & Chmiel, N. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering. In M. I. Posner & O. S. Marin (Eds.), Attention and Performance II (pp. 107-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Caessens, B. & Vandierendonck, A. (2002). Inhibition and blindness to response-compatible stimuli: a reappraisal. Acta Psychologica, 111, 44-57.
3. Fagioli, S., Hommel, B., & Schubotz, R. I. (2005). Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69 (this issue).
4. Hommel, B. (2005). Feature integration across perception and action: event files affect response choice. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69, XX-XX.
5. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J, Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
6. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. L., and Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 68, 1-17.
7. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 110, 306-340.
8. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. M. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies, & J. Beatty (Eds.), Varieties of Attention, (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic.
9. Milliken, B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2005). Repetition costs in word identification: Evaluating a stimulus-response integration account. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69 (this issue).
10. Milliken, B., Lupiañez, J., Debner, J., & Abello, B. (1999). Automatic and controlled processing in stroop negative priming: The role of attentional set . Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1384-1402.
11. Mordkoff, T. (1998). The gating of irrelevant information in selective-attention tasks (Abstract). Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 3, 193.
12. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
13. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125-129.
14. Müsseler, J., Wühr, P, & Prinz, W. (2000). Varying the response-code in the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Visual Cognition, 7, 743-767.
15. Müsseler, J., Steininger, S., & Wühr, P. (2001). Can actions affect perceptual processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54(A), 137-154.
16. Oriet, C., Stevanovski, B., Jolicœur, P., & Cowan, W. B. (2003). Lengthening the duration of response execution does not modulate blindness to action-compatible stimuli. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 11-22.
17. Park, J. & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 613-623.
18. Prinz, W. (1992). Why don't we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1-20.
19. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 1-17.
20. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro experimental laboratory: an integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 20, 206-217.
21. Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S-R compatibility. Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97-102.
22. Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (2002). Blinded by headlights. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 65-74.
23. Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 431-440.
24. Stevanovski, B., Oriet, C., & Jolicœur, P. (in press). Relative contributions of conceptual and response-related activation in blindness to congruent stimuli. Visual Cognition.
25. Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
26. Stoet, G. & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance, Vol. XIX (pp. 538-552). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345-1363.
28. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
29. Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., & Nattkemper, D. (2005). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung. Special issue on: Integration in and across perception and action, 69, XX-XX.
30. Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1260-1270.