Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 1260-1270

  Wühr, Peter ^a   Müsseler, Jochen ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEMORY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; HUMANS; MEMORY; MOTION PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 85047684158     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.5.1260     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Armstrong, I. T., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1995). Repetition deficit in rapid-serial-visual-presentation displays: Encoding failure or retrieval failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1044-1052.
2. Arnell, K., & Duncan, J. (1998, November). Substantial interference between response selection and stimulus encoding. Poster presented at the 39th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas, TX.
3. Bavelier, D., & Potter, M. C. (1992). Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 18, 134-147.
4. Bjork, E. L., & Murray, J. T. (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review, 84, 472-484.
5. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673-1692.
6. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-989.
7. De Jong, R., & Sweet, J. B. (1994). Preparatory strategies in overlapping-task performance. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 142-151.
8. Dell'Acqua, R., Turatto, M., & Jolicœur, P. (in press). Cross-modal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation. Perception & Psychophysics.
9. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
10. Estes, W. K. (1972). An associative basis for coding and organization in memory. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory (pp. 161-190). Washington, DC: Winston.
11. Fraisse, P. (1978). Time and rhythm perception. In E. C. Carterette & P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception (Vol. 8, pp. 203-254). New York: Academic Press.
12. Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Item repetition in short-term memory: Ranschburg repeated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1162-1181.
13. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (in press). The theory of event coding (TEC). A framework for perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
14. Jahnke, J. C. (1969). The Ranschburg effect. Psychological Review, 76, 592-605.
15. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
16. Jolicœur, P. (1999). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 596-616.
17. Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
18. Luo, C., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Repetition blindness under minimum memory load: Effects of spatial and temporal proximity and the encoding effectiveness of the first item. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1053-1064.
19. MacKay, D. G. (1986). Self-inhibition and the disruptive effects of internal and external feedback in skilled behavior. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 174-186). London: Springer.
20. MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action. New York: Springer.
21. Müsseler, J. (1999). How independent from action control is perception? An event-coding account for more equally-ranked crosstalks. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp. 121-147). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. Müsseler, J., & ommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
23. Müsseler, J., & ommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125-129.
24. Müsseler, J., Steininger, S., & Wühr, P. (2001). Can actions affect perceptual processing? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54(A), 137-154.
25. Müsseler, J., & Wühr, P. (in press). Motor-evoked interference in visual encoding. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Müsseler, J., Wühr, P., & Prinz, W. (2000). Varying the response code in the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Visual Cognition, 7, 743-767.
27. Prinz, W. (1990). A common-coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167-201). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
28. Ranschburg, P. (1902). Über die Bedeutung der Ähnlichkeit beim Erlernen, Behalten, und bei der Reproduktion [On the role of similarity for learning, retention, and reproduction]. Journal der Psychologie und Neurologie, 5, 93-127.
29. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991). Human motor control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30. Santee, J. L., & Egeth, H. E. (1982). Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 489-501.
31. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
32. Wühr, P. (2000). Sieht man immer was man tut? Wie sich Handlungen auf die visuelle Wahrnehmung auswirken [Do we always see what we are doing? How actions affect visual perception]. Berlin, Germany: Logos Verlag.
33. Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (in press). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli in the psychological-refractory-period paradigm. Visual Cognition.