Inhibition and blindness to response-compatible stimuli: A reappraisal

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 45-57

  Caessens, Bernie ^a   Vandierendonck, André ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Blindness to response compatible stimuli; Dual task interference; Response inhibition; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STUDENT; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STUDENTS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036637378     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00018-5     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Band, G., & Van Boxtel, G. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica, 101, 179-211.
2. Brunia, C. H. M. (1999). Neural aspects of anticipatory behaviour. Acta Psychologica, 101, 213-242.
3. Brysbaert, M., Bovens, d'Ydewalle, G., & Van Calster, A. (1989). Turbo pascal timing routines for the IBM microcomputer family. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 21, 73-81.
4. Caessens, B., Van der Goten, K., Lammertyn, J., De Vooght, G., & Hommel, B. (1997). Temporal characteristics of action plans. In B. Aravind (Ed.), Proceedings of sixth meeting of the Dutch psychonomic society. Egmond Aan Zee, December 19-20.
5. Craighero, L., Fadiga, L., Rizzolatti, G., & Umilta, C. (1999). Movement for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1673-1692.
6. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., & Logan, G. D. (1995). Strategies and mechanisms in non-selective and selective inhibitory motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 498-511.
7. De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., Logan, G., & Gratton, G. (1990). In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 164-182.
8. De Yoe, E. A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1988). Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 11, 219-226.
9. Eimer, M. (1993). Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a go/nogo task. Biological Psychology, 35, 123-138.
10. Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21 (4), 837-854.
11. Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica, 101(2-3), 293-313.
12. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(6), 1737-1747.
13. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2000). Incidental action-outcome learning influences intentional response selection. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, S86-S87.
14. Engel, A., Roelfsema, P., Fries, P., Brecht, M., & Singer, W. (1997). Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding. Cerebral Cortex, 7(6), 571-582.
15. Falkenstein, M., Hoorman, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1999). ERP Components in go/nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 101, 27-291.
16. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609.
17. Gemba, H., & Sasaki, K. (1990). Potential related to nogo-reaction in go/nogo hand movements with discrimination between tone stimuli of different frequencies in the monkey. Brain Research, 537, 340-344.
18. Grèzes, J., Costes, N., & Décety, J. (1999). The effects of learning and intention on the neural network involved in the perception of meaningless actions. Brain, 122(10), 1875-1887.
19. Harleß, E. (1861). Der apparat des willens. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, 38, 50-73.
20. Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the simon task: evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280-290.
21. Hommel, B. (1997). Towards an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel, & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
22. Hommel, B. (1998a). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1368-1384.
23. Hommel, B. (1998b). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1-2), 183-216.
24. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W., (2002). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
25. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. (1996). Inhibitory mechanisms of neural and cognitive control: applications to selective attention and sequential action. Brain and Cognition, 30(1), 20-43.
26. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. NY: Dover Publications.
27. Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
28. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. (1992). The reviewing of object-files: object specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
29. Kok, A. (1999). Varieties of inhibition: manifestations in cognition event-related potentials and aging. Acta Psychologica, 101, 129-158.
30. Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 387-394.
31. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a user's guide to the stop-signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach, & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp. 214-249). San Diego: Academic Press.
32. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295-327.
33. Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medicinische Psychologie oder die Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Bucchandlung.
34. Müsseler, J., Wühr, P., & Prinz, W. (2000). Varying the response-code in the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Visual Cognition, 7(6), 743-767.
35. Müsseler, J., Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
36. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 125-129.
37. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129-154.
38. Proctor, R., & Reeve, T. (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
39. Smyth, M. M., & Haggard, P. (1999). Movement and action: introduction to the special topic. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 243-246.
40. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and Performance XIX (pp. 538-552), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1625-1640.
42. Tipper, S. (1985). The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37A(4), 571-590.
43. Tipper, S., Weaver, B., & Houghton, G. (1994). Behavioural goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Section A - Human experimental Psychology), 47(4), 809-840.
44. Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (1997). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Max-Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Paper 2/1997, 1-34.