Automatic and Controlled Processing in Stroop Negative Priming: The Role of Attentional Set

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1384-1402

  Milliken, Bruce ^a   Lupianez, Juan ^b   Debner, Jim ^a   Abello, Brent ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033485180     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1384     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
2. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. L. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
3. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 23, 1211-1214.
4. den Heyer, K., Briand, K., & Dannenbring, G. L. (1983). Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task: Evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes. Memory & Cognition, 11, 374-381.
5. DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 27-47.
6. Driver, J., & Tipper, S. P. (1989). On the nonselectivity of "selective" seeing: Contrasts between interference and priming in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 304-314.
7. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
8. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 145-173.
9. Fox, E., & DeFockert, J. W. (1998). Negative priming depends on prime-probe similarity: Evidence for episodic retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 107-113.
10. Fuentes, L. J., & Tudela, P. (1992). Semantic processing of foveally and parafoveally presented words in a lexical decision task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 45A, 299-322.
11. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
12. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
13. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
14. Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523-553.
15. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
16. Logan, G. D., & Zbrodoff, N. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 166-174.
17. Logan, G. D., Zbrodoff, N. J., & Williamson, J. (1984). Strategies in the color-word Stroop task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 135-138.
18. Lowe, D. G. (1979). Strategies, context and the mechanisms of response inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 382-389.
19. May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35-54.
20. Merikle, P. M., & Cheesman, J. (1987). Current status of research on subliminal perception. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 298-302.
21. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
22. Meyer, D. M., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and Performance V (pp. 98-118). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23. Milliken, B., & Joordens, S. (1996). Negative priming without overt prime selection. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 333-346.
24. Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P. M., & Seiffert, A. (1998). Selective attention: Re-evaluating the implications of negative priming. Psychological Review, 105, 203-229.
25. Milliken, B., & Rock, A. (1997). Negative priming, attention, and discriminating the present from the past. Consciousness and Cognition, 6, 308-327.
26. Moore, C. M. (1994). Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone? Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 133-147.
27. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
28. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
29. Neill, W. T. (1977a). Attention: The coordination of internal codes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
30. Neill, W. T. (1977b). Inhibition and facilitation processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444-450.
31. Neill, W. T. (1978). Decision processes in selective attention: Response priming in the Stroop color-word task. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 80-84.
32. Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1291-1305.
33. Neill, W. T., & Kahan, T. (1999). Response conflict reverses priming: A replication. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 304-308.
34. Neill, W. T., Lissner, L. S., & Beck, J. L. (1990). Negative priming in same-different matching: Further evidence for a central locus of inhibition. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 398-400.
35. Neill, W. T., & Mathis, K. M. (1998). Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 38, pp. 1-44). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), New perspectives on interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-261). New York: Academic Press.
37. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). The persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993-1000.
38. Neill, W. T., & Westberry, R. L. (1987). Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 327-334.
39. Ortells, J. J., & Tudela, P. (1996). Positive and negative semantic priming of attended and unattended parafoveal words in a lexical decision task. Acta Psychologica, 94, 209-226.
40. Park, J., & Kanwisher, N. (1994). Negative priming for spatial location: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 613-623.
41. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 101, 177-184.
43. Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
44. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1-17.
45. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro-Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20, 206-217.
46. Stolz, J., & Neely, J. H. (1995). When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 596-611.
47. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
48. Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
49. Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially-directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492-504.
50. Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591-611.
51. Treisman, A., & DeSchepper, B. (1996). Object tokens, attention, and visual memory. In T. Inni & J. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVI (pp. 15-46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Van Selst, M. A., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
53. Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1997). Production, evaluation, and preservation of experiences: Constructive processing in remembering and performance tasks. In D. Medin (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 211-264). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
54. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Jacoby, L. L. (1990). Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 546-565.
55. Wood, T., & Milliken, B. (1998). Negative priming without ignoring. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 470-475.
56. Yee, P. L. (1991). Semantic inhibition of ignored words during a figure classification task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43A, 127-153.