Standards-based mathematics curricula and secondary students' performance on standardized achievement tests

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 71-101

  Harwell, Michael R ^a   Post, Thomas R ^a   Maeda, Yukiko ^a   Davis, Jon D ^b   Cutler, Arnold L ^a   Andersen, Edwin ^a   Kahan, Jeremy A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Ida Crown Jewish Academy   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross sectional studies; Integrated curriculum; Multivariate techniques; Program project assessment; Secondary mathematics

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846343662     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abeille, A., & Hurley, N. (2001). Final evaluation report: Mathematics modeling our world. Accessed on October 18, 2003, from http://www.comap.com/highschool/projects/mmow/FinalReport.pdf.
2. Begle, E. G. (1973). Some lessons learned by SMSG. Mathematics Teacher, 66, 207-214.
3. Bell, M. (1988-1996). Everyday mathematics. Chicago: Everyday Learning Corporation.
4. Berlinghoff, W. P., Sloyer, C., & Hayden, R. W. (2000). Math connections: A secondary core curriculum (Years 1-3). Armonk, NY: It's About Time.
5. Briars, D., & Resnick, L. (2000). Standards, Assessments - and What Else? The essential elements of Standards-based school improvement. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved October 15, 2003, from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/CRESST/Reports/TECH528.pdf
6. Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19, 1-15.
7. Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley.
8. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand, McNally & Company.
9. Cochran, W. G. (1983). Planning and analysis of observational studies. New York: John Wiley.
10. Cichon, D., & Ellis, J. G. (2003), The effects of Math Connections on student achievement, confidence, and perception. In S. L. Senk and D. R. Thompson (Eds.). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they ? What do students leant ? (pp. 345-374). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Coxford, A. F., Fey, J. T., Hirsch, C. R., Schoen, H. L., Burrill, G., Hart, E. W. et al. (1998). Contemporary mathematics in context: A unified approach (Courses 1-4). New York: Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
12. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
13. Dienes, Z. P. (1969). Building up mathematics. Hutchinson Educational, WI: London.
14. Feldt, L. S., Forsyth, R. A., Ansley, T. N., & Alnot, S. D. (1993). Iowa tests of educational development (Forms K & L). Chicago: Riverside.
15. Fendel, D., Resek, D., Alper, L., & Fraser, S. (1997). Interactive mathematics program (Years 1-4). Berkeley, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
16. Friedman, T. L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
17. Furth, H. G. (1970). Piaget for teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Garfunkel, S., Godbold, L., & Pollak, H. (1998). Mathematics: Modeling our world (Courses 1-4). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Educational Publishing.
19. Ginsburg, H., & Opper, S. (1988). Piaget's theory of intellectual development (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Harcourt Brace. (1996). Stanford achievement test, ninth edition. San Antonio, TX: Author.
21. Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Hiebert, J. (2003). What research says about the NCTM Standards. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 5-24). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
23. Huntley, M. A., Rasmussen, C. L., Villarubi, R. S., Sangtong, J., & Fey, J. T. (2000). Effects of Standards-based mathematics education: A study of the Core-Plus Mathematics Project algebra and functions strand. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 328-361.
24. Kilpatrick, J. (2003). What Works? In S. L. Senk and D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? (pp. 471-487). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: Vygotsky, his disciplines and critics. American Psychologist, 41, 264-274.
26. Lambdin, D. V., & Preston, R. V. (1995). Caricatures in innovation: Teacher adaptation to an investigation-oriented middle school mathematics curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 46, 130-140.
27. Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (1991-1997). Connected mathematics. White Plains, NY: Dale Seymour Publications.
28. Lesh, R. (1979). Mathematical learning disabilities: Considerations for identification, diagnosis, and remediation. In R. Lesh, D. Mierkiewicz, & M. Kantowski (Eds.), Applied mathematical problem solving (pp. 111-180). Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.
29. Lott, J. W., & Burke, M. (1996). Integrated mathematics: A modeling approach using technology (Levels 1-6). Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.
30. Lott, J. W., Hirstein, J., Allinger, G., Walen, S., Burke, M., Lundin, M., et al. (2003). Curriculum and assessment in SIMMS Integrated Mathematics. In S. L. Senk & D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? (pp. 399-423). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. McCaffrey, D. F., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Klein, S. P., Bugliari, D., & Robyn, A. (2001). Interactions among instructional practices, curriculum, and student achievement: The case of Standards- based high school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 493-517.
32. McLeod, D. B. (1994). Research on affect and mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 637-647.
33. Meece, J. L. (1997). Child and adolescent development for educators. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. An Agenda for Action: Recommendations for School Mathematics of the 1980s. Reston, Va: Author.
35. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
36. Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. Mussen (Ed.). Carmichael's manual of child psychology (3rd Ed., Vol. 1, pp. 703-732). New York: Wiley.
37. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2005). HLM 6.02: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
39. Reys, R., Reys, B., Lapan, R., Holliday, G., & Wasman, D. (2003). Assessing the impact of Standards-based middle grades mathematics curriculum material on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 74-95.
40. Riordan, J. E., & Noyce, P. E. (2001). The Impact of two Standards-based mathematics curricula on student achievement in Massachusetts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 368-398.
41. Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational studies (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
42. Schoen, H. L., & Hirsch, C. R. (2003). The Core-Plus Mathematics Project: Perspectives and student achievement. In S. L. Senk & D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students leant ? (pp. 311-343). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Schoen, H. L., & Pritchett, J. (1998, April). Students' perceptions and attitudes in a standards-based high school mathematics curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420518).
44. Schoen, H. L., Cebulla, K. J., Finn, K. F., & Fi, C. (2003). Teacher variables that relate to student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 228-259.
45. Schoen, H. L., Fey, J. T., Hirsch, C. R., & Coxford, A. F. (1999). Issues and options in the math wars. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 444-453.
46. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students' mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 338-355.
47. Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula? What are they? What do students learn''. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417-453.
49. Stanford Technical Data Report. (1997). Stanford achievement test series (ninth edition). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.
50. Tate, W. F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 652-679.
51. Truitt, B. A. D. (1998). How teachers implement the instructional model in a reformed high school mathematics classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
52. Tudge, J. R. H., & Winterhoff, P. A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: Perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development, 36, 61-81.
53. Webh, N. L (2003). The impact of the Interactive Mathematics Program on student learning. In S. L. Senk & D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they ? What do students learn? (pp. 375-398). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Wiley D. E., & Resnick, L. B. (1998) The new standards reference examination standards-referenced scoring system. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies. University of California, Los Angeles.
55. Wilson, M., & Lloyd, G. (1995). High school teachers ' experiences in a student-centered mathematics curriculum. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED389603)
56. Wu, H. (1997). The mathematics education reform: Why you should be concerned and what you can do. American Mathematical Monthly, 104, 946-954.