Inbreeding depression in an autotetraploid herb: A three cohort field study

New Phytologist

Volumn 173, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 383-392

  Galloway, Laura F ^a   Etterson, Julie R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Autotetraploid; Cumulative fitness; Environmental variation; Field study; Inbreeding depression; Polyploidy; Temporal variation

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; COHORT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; FIELD SURVEY; FITNESS; HERB; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; OUTCROSSING; POLYPLOIDY;

ARTICLE; CAMPANULACEAE; ENVIRONMENT; GERMINATION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INBREEDING; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; POLYPLOIDY;

CAMPANULACEAE; ENVIRONMENT; GERMINATION; INBREEDING; POLYPLOIDY; SEEDS;

CAMPANULASTRUM AMERICANUM;

EID: 33845602213     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01909.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adams KL, Wendel JF. 2005. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8: 135-141.
2. Armbruster P, Reed DH. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95: 235-242.
3. Baack EJ. 2005. To succeed globally, disperse locally: effects of local pollen and seed dispersal on tetraploid establishment. Heredity 94: 538-546.
4. Bennett JH. 1976. Expectations for inbreeding depression on self-fertilization of tetraploids. Biometrics 32: 449-452.
5. Bever JD, Felber F. 1992. The theoretical population genetics of autopolyploidy. In: Antonovics J, Futuyma D, eds. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, Vol. 8. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, pp. 185-217.
6. Bingham ET, Groose RW, Woodfield DR, Kidwell KK. 1994. Complementary gene interactions in alfalfa are greater in autotetraploids than diploids. Crop Science 34: 823-829.
7. Burton TL, Husband BC. 1999. Population cytotype structure in the polyploid Galax urceolata (Diapensiaceae). Heredity 82: 381-390.
8. Burton TL, Husband BC. 2000. Fitness differences among diploids, tetraploids, and their triploid progeny in Chamerion angustifolium: Mechanisms of inviability and implications for polyploid evolution. Evolution 54: 1182-1191.
9. Busbice TH, Wilsie CP. 1966. Inbreeding depression and heterosis in autotetraploids with application to Medicago sativa L. Euphytica 15: 52-67.
10. Butruille DV, Boiteux LS. 2000. Selection-mutation balance in polysomic tetraploids: Impact of double reduction and gametophytic selection on the frequency of subchromosomal localization of deleterious mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 6608-6613.
11. Carr DE, Dudash MR. 2003. Recent approaches into the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 358: 1071-1084.
12. Carr DE, Dudash MR. 1997. The effects of five generations of enforced selfing on potential male and female function in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51: 1797-1807.
13. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1999. The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genetical Research 74: 329-340.
14. Cheptou PO, Imbert E, Lepart J, Escarre J. 2000. Effects of competition on lifetime estimates of inbreeding depression in the outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 522-531.
15. Cheptou PO, Mathias A. 2001. Can varying inbreeding depression select for intermediary selfing rates? American Naturalist 157: 361-373.
16. Cheptou PO, Schoen DJ. 2002. The cost of fluctuating inbreeding depression. Evolution 56: 1059-1062.
17. Dole J, Ritland K. 1993. Inbreeding depression in 2 Mimulus taxa measured by multigenerational changes in the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 47: 361-373.
18. Dudash MR. 1990. Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44: 1129-1139.
19. Evanhoe L, Galloway LF. 2002. Floral longevity in Campanula americana (Campanulaceae): a comparison of morphological and functional gender phases. American Journal of Botany 89: 611-615.
20. Gadella TWJ. 1964. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Campanula. Wentia 11: 1-104.
21. Galloway LF. 2001. Parental environmental effects on life history in the herbaceous plant Campanula americana. Ecology 82: 2781-2789.
22. Galloway LF, Cirigliano T, Gremski K. 2002. The contribution of display size and dichogamy to potential geitonogamy in Campanula americana. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 133-139.
23. Galloway LF, Etterson JR, Hamrick JL. 2003. Outcrossing rates and inbreeding depression in the herbaceous autotetraploid Campanula americana. Heredity 90: 308-315.
24. Good-Avila SV, Nagel T, Vogler DW, Stephenson AG. 2003. Effects of inbreeding on male function and self-fertility in the partially self-incompatible herb Campanula rapunculoides (Campanulaceae). American Journal of Botany 90: 1736-1745.
25. Grant V. 1981. Plant speciation. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.
26. Hardy OJ, Vanderhoeven S, De Loose M, Meerts P. 2000. Ecological, morphological and allozymic differentiation between diploid and tetraploid knapweeds (Centaurea jacea) from a contact zone in the Belgian Ardennes. New Phytologist 146: 281-290.
27. Hayes CN, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG. 2005a. Multigenerational effects of inbreeding in Cucurbita pepo ssp. Texana (Cucurbitaceae). Evolution 59: 276-286.
28. Hayes CN, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG. 2005b. Environmental variation influences the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana (Cucurbitaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18: 147-155.
29. Heschel MS, Hausmann N, Schmitt J. 2005. Testing for stress-dependent inbreeding depression in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 1322-1329.
30. Husband BC. 2004. The role of triploid hybrids in the evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 537-546.
31. Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
32. Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1997. The effect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae): implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Evolution 51: 737-746.
33. Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1998. Cytotype distribution at a diploid-tetraploid contact zone in Chamerion (Epilobium) angustifolium (Onagraceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 1688-1694.
34. Inoue K, Masuda M, Maki M. 1998. Inbreeding depression and outcrossing rate in the endangered autotetraploid plant Aster kantoensis (Asteraceae). Journal of Heredity 89: 559-562.
35. Koelewijn HP. 1998. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on progeny fitness in Plantago coronopus. Evolution 52: 692-702.
36. Kruszewski L, Galloway LF. 2006. Explaining outcrossing rate in Campanulastrum americanum (Campanulaceae): geitonogamy and cryptic self-incompatibility. International Journal of Plant Sciences 167: 455-461.
37. Lande R, Schemske DW. 1985. The evolution of self fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
38. Masterson J. 1994. Stomatal size in fossil plants - evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264: 421-424.
39. Otto SP, Whitton J. 2000. Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics 34: 401-437.
40. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 589-639.
41. Ramsey M, Vaughton G. 1998. Effect of environment on the magnitude of inbreeding depression in seed germination in a partially self-fertile perennial herb (Blandfordia grandiflora, Liliaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 98-104.
42. Rausch JH, Morgan MT. 2005. The effect of self-fertilization, inbreeding depression, and population size on autopolyploid establishment. Evolution 59: 1867-1875.
43. Rodriguez DJ. 1996. A model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants. American Naturalist 147: 33-46.
44. Ronfort J. 1999. The mutation load under tetrasomic inheritance and its consequences for the evolution of the selfing rate in autotetraploid species. Genetical Research 74: 31-42.
45. SAS Institute. 2003. SAS/STAT, version 9.1. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.
46. Scannell DR, Byrne KP, Gordon JL, Wong S, Wolfe KH. 2006. Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 440: 341-345.
47. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Pires JC, Kovarik A, Tate JA, Mavrodiev E. 2004. Recent and recurrent polyploidy in Tragopogon (Asteraceae): cytogenetic, genomic and genetic comparisons. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 485-501.
48. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Tate JA. 2003. Advances in the study of polyploidy since plant speciation. New Phytologist 161: 173-191.
49. Song KM, Lu P, Tang KL, Osborn TC. 1995. Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implication for polyploid evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 7719-7723.
50. Vange V. 2002. Breeding system and inbreeding depression in the clonal plant species Knautia arvensis (Dipsacaceae): implications for survival in abandoned grassland. Biological Conservation 108: 59-67.
51. Vogler DW, Filmore K, Stephenson AG. 1999. Inbreeding depression in Campanula rapunculoides L. I. A comparison of inbreeding depression in plants derived from strong and weak self-incompatibility phenotypes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12: 483-494.
52. Wardle GM. 1998. A graph theory approach to demographic loop analysis. Ecology 79: 2539-2549.
53. Weiss H, Dobes C, Schneeweiss GM, Greimler J. 2002. Occurrence of tetraploid and hexaploid cytotypes between and within populations in Dianthus sect. Plumaria (Caryophyllaceae). New Phytologist 156: 85-94.
54. Wendel JF. 2000. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Molecular Biology 42: 225-249.
55. Wolfe KH. 2001. Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nature Reviews Genetics 2: 333-341.