Multigenerational effects of inbreeding in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana (Cucurbitaceae)

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 276-286

  Hayes, C Nelson ^a   Winsor, James A ^b   Stephenson, Andrew G ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coefficients of inbreeding; Cucurbitaceae; Female function; Inbreeding depression; Male function; Maternal effects; Pollen performance

Indexed keywords

FITNESS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MATERNAL EFFECT; POLLINATION;

CUCUMIS SATIVUS; CUCURBITA PEPO; CUCURBITACEAE; PEPO;

EID: 14844343910     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00988.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Avila-Sakar, G., S. M. Simmers, and A. G. Stephenson. 2003. The interrelationships among leaf damage, anther development, and pollen production in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana (Cucurbitaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 164:395-404.
2. Barrett, S. C. H., and D. Charlesworth. 1991. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352:522-524.
3. Brewbaker, J. L., and B. H. Kwack. 1963. The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am. J. Bot. 50:859-865.
4. Byers, D. L., and D. M. Waller. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:479-513.
5. Carr, D. E., and M. R. Dudash. 1997. The effects of five generations of enforced selfing on potential male and female function in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51:1797-1807.
6. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:237-268.
7. _. 1990. Inbreeding depression with heterozygote advantage and its effect on selection for modifiers changing the outcrossing rate. Evolution 44:870-888.
8. Crnokrak, P., and S. C. H. Barrett. 2002. Purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56:2347-2358.
9. Decker, D. S., and H. D. Wilson. 1987. Allozyme variation in the Cucurbita pepo complex: C. pepo var. ovifera vs. C. texana. Syst. Bot. 12:263-273.
10. Decker-Walters, D. S. 1990. Evidence for multiple domestication of Cucurbita pepo. Pp. 96-101 in D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson, and C. Jeffrey, eds. Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.
11. Delph, L. F., M. H. Jóhannsson, and A. G. Stephenson. 1997. How environmental factors affect pollen performance: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Ecology 78:1632-1639.
12. Dole, J., and K. Ritland. 1993. Inbreeding depression in two Mimulus taxa measured by multigenerational changes in the coefficient of inbreeding. Evolution 47:361-373.
13. Dudash, M. R., and D. E. Carr. 1998. Genetics underlying inbreeding depression in Mimulus with contrasting mating systems. Nature 393:682-684.
14. Dudash, M. R., D. E. Carr, and C. B. Fenster. 1997. Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus: inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level. Evolution 51:54-65.
15. Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Wiley, New York.
16. Fu, Y.-B., and K. Ritland. 1996. Marker-based inferences about epistasis for genes influencing inbreeding depression. Genetics 144:339-348.
17. Hartl, D. L., and A. G. Clark. 1997. Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
18. Hauser, T. P., and V. Loeschcke. 1995. Inbreeding depression in Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae): effects of different levels of inbreeding. J. Evol. Biol. 8:589-600.
19. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
20. Jóhannsson, M. H., M. J. Gates, and A. G. Stephenson. 1998. Inbreeding depression affects pollen performance in Cucurbita texana. J. Evol. Biol. 11:579-588.
21. Koelewijn, H. P. 1998. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on progeny fitness in Plantago coronopus. Evolution 52:692-702.
22. Krebs, J. L., and J. F. Hancock. 1990. Early acting inbreeding depression and reproductive success in the highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79:825-832.
23. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
24. Latta, R., and K. Ritland. 1993. Models for the evolution of selfing under alternative modes of inheritance. Heredity 71:1-10.
25. Lira, R., T. C. Andrés, and M. Nee. 1995. Cucurbita. Pp. 1-115 in R. Lira, ed. Systematic and ecogeographic studies on crop genepools. Vol. 9. Estudios taxonómicos y ecogeográficos de las Cucurbitaceae latino americanas de importancia económica: Cucurbita, Sechium, Sicana y Cyclanthera. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute Instituto deo Biología, México D.F.
26. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
27. Lyons, E. E. 1996. Breeding system evolution in Leavenworthia. II. Genetic and nongenetic parental effects on reproductive success in selfing and more outcrossing populations of Leavenworthia crassa. Am. Nat. 147:65-85.
28. Mayer, S. S., D. Charlesworth, and B. Meyers. 1996. Inbreeding depression in four populations of Collinsia heterophylla Nutt (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 50:879-891.
29. McCall, C., D. M. Waller, and T. Mitchell-Olds. 1994. Effects of serial inbreeding on fitness components in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 48:818-827.
30. Montgomery, D. C. 1997. Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
31. Rich, P. M., D. M. Ranken, and J. S. George. 1989. A manual for microcomputer image analysis. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
32. Roach, D. A., and R. D. Wulff. 1987. Maternal effects in plants. Annu. Rev. Syst. Ecol. 18:209-236.
33. Stephenson, A. G. 1992. The regulation of the maternal investment in plants. Pp. 151-171 in C. Marshall and J. Grace, eds. Fruit and seed production. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
34. Stephenson, A. G., C. W. Erickson, T.-C. Lau, M. R. Quesada, and J. A. Winsor. 1994. Effects of growing conditions on the male gametophyte. Pp. 220-229 in A.G. Stephenson and T. H. Kao, eds. Pollen-pistil interactions and pollen tube growth. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD.
35. Stephenson, A. G., J. L. Poulton, T.-C. Lau, and R. T. Koide. 1998. Effects of soil phosphorus level and mycorrhizal infection on the male function of plants. Curr. Topics Plant Physiol. 19:52-67.
36. Stephenson, A. G., C. N. Hayes, M. H. Jóhannsson, and J. A. Winsor. 2001. The performance of microgametophytes is affected by inbreeding depression and hybrid vigor in the sporophytic generation. Sex. Plant Reprod. 14:77-83.
37. Volger, D. W., K. Filmore, and A. G. Stephenson. 1999. Inbreeding depression in Campanula rapunculoides L. I. A comparison of inbreeding depression in plants derived from strong and weak self-incompatibility phenotypes. J. Evol. Biol. 12:483-494.
38. Willis, J. H. 1993. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on fitness components in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 47:864-876.
39. _. 1999. The role of genes of large effect on inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 53:1678-1691.
40. Wolfe, L. 1993. Inbreeding depression in Hydrophyllum appendiculatum: role of maternal effects, crowding, and parental mating history. Evolution 47:374-386.
41. Wright, S. 1977. Evolution and genetics of populations: experimental results and evolutionary deductions. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.