Environmental variation influences the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana (Cucurbitaceae)

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 147-155

  Hayes, C Nelson ^a   Winsor, James A ^b   Stephenson, Andrew G ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cucurbita; Female function; Inbreeding depression; Male function; Soil nitrogen

Indexed keywords

FERTILIZER; TRACE ELEMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FITNESS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; NITROGEN; NUTRIENT LIMITATION;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INBREEDING; METABOLISM; SQUASH;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CUCURBITA; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FERTILIZERS; INBREEDING; MICRONUTRIENTS;

CUCURBITA; CUCURBITA PEPO; PEPO;

EID: 12744262935     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00785.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Bertin, R.I. 1982. Paternity and fruit production in trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans). Am. Nat. 119: 694-709.
2. Brewbaker, J.L. & Kwack, B.H. 1963. The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Am. J. Bot. 50: 859-865.
3. Broyles, S.B. & Wyatt, R. 1990. Paternity analysis in a natural population of Asclepias exaltata: multiple paternity, functional gender, and the "pollen-donation hypothesis". Evolution 44: 1454-1468.
4. Byers, D.L. & Waller, D.M. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 479-513.
5. Carr, D.E. & Dudash, M.R. 1995. Inbreeding depression under a competitive regime in Mimulus guttatus: consequences for potential male and female function. Heredity. 75: 437-445.
6. Carr, D.E. & Dudash, M.R. 1997. The effects of five generations of enforced selfing on potential male and female function in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51: 1797-1807.
7. Carr, D.E. & Eubanks, M.D. 2002. Inbreeding alters resistance to insect herbivory and host plant quality in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 56: 22-30.
8. del Castillo, R.F. 1998. Fitness consequences of maternal and nonmaternal components of fitness in the gynodioecious Phacelia dubia. Evolution 52: 44-60.
9. Chang, S.-M. & Rausher, M.D. 1999. The role of inbreeding depression in maintaining the mixed mating system of the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution 53: 1366-1376.
10. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1979. The evolutionary genetics of sexual systems in flowering plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 205: 513-530.
11. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
12. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1990. Inbreeding depression with heterozygote advantage and its effect on selection for modifiers changing the outcrossing rate. Evolution 44: 870-888.
13. Cheptou, P.-O. & Schoen, D.J. 2002. The cost of fluctuating inbreeding depression. Evolution 56: 1059-1062.
14. Cheptou, C.-O., Imbert, E., LePart, J. & Escarre, J. 2000. Effects of competition on lifetime estimates of inbreeding depression in the outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). J. Evol. Biol. 13: 522-531.
15. Coen, E.S. & Meyerowitz, E.M. 1991. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature. 353: 31-37.
16. Conner, J.K., Rush, S. & Jennetten, P. 1996a. Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). 1. Selection through lifetime female fitness. Evolution 50: 1127-1136.
17. Conner J.K., Rush, S., Kercher, S. & Jennetten, P. 1996b. Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). 2. Selection through lifetime male and total fitness. Evolution 50: 1137-1146.
18. Crnokrak, P. & Barrett, S.C.H. 2002. Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence. Evolution 56: 2347-2358.
19. Darwin, C. 1876. The Effects of Self and Cross Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom. Appleton and Company, New York.
20. Decker, D.S. & Wilson, H.D. 1987. Allozyme variation in Cucurbita pepo complex C. pepo var overifera vs. C. texana. Syst. Bot. 12: 263-273.
21. Decker-Walters, D.S. 1990. Evidence for multiple domestication of Cucurbita pepo. In: Biology and Utilization of the Cucurbitaceae (D. M. Bates, R. W. Robinson & C. Jeffrey, eds), pp. 96-101. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
22. Devlin, B. & Ellstrand, N.C. 1990. Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, an hermaphrodite. Am. Nat. 136: 86-107.
23. Dole, J. & Ritland, K. 1993. Inbreeding depression in two Mimulus taxa measured by multigenerational changes in inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 47: 361-373.
24. Dudash, M. 1990. Relative fitness of selfed and outcross progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44: 1129-1139.
25. Dudash, M.R., Carr, D.E. & Fenster, C.B. 1997. Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus: inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level. Evolution 51: 54-65.
26. Eckert, C.G. & Barrett, S.C.H. 1994. Inbreeding depression in partially self-fertilizing Decodon verticillatus: population genetic and experimental analysis. Evolution 48: 952-964.
27. Hauser, T.P., & Loeschcke, V. 1996. Drought stress and inbreeding depression in Lychnis flos-cuculi (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 50: 1119-1126.
28. Hedrick, P.W., Savolainen, O. & Kärkkäinen, K. 1999. Factors influencing the extent of inbreeding depression: an example from Scots pine. Heredity. 82: 441-450.
29. Helenurm, K. & Schaal, B.A. 1996. Genetic load, nutrient limitation, and seed production in Lupinus texensis (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 83: 1585-1595.
30. Holsinger, K.E. 1988. Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating system evolution. Evolution 42: 1235-1244.
31. Husband, B.C. & Schemske, D.W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
32. Jóhannsson, M.H., Gates, M.J. & Stephenson, A.G. 1998. Inbreeding depression affects pollen performance in Cucurbita texana. J. Evol. Biol. 11: 579-588.
33. Koelewijn, H.P. 1998. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on progeny fitness in Plantago coronopus. Evolution 52: 692-702.
34. Lande, R. & Schemske, D.W. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
35. Lau, T.-C. & Stephenson, A.G. 1993. Effects of soil nitrogen on pollen production, pollen grain size, and pollen performance in Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80: 763-768.
36. Lira, R., Andrés, T.C. & Nee, M. 1995. Cucurbita. Pages 1-115. In: Systematic and Ecogeographic Studies on Crop Genepools. Vol 9. Estudios taxonómicos y ecogeográficos de las Cucurbitaceae latino-americanas de importancia económica: Cucurbita, Sechium, Sicana y Cyclanthera (R. Lira, ed.), pp. 396. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute. Instituto deo Biología, México D.F. and Rome.
37. Lloyd, D. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113: 67-79.
38. Lloyd, D.G. & Webb, C.J. 1997. Secondary sex characters in plants. Bot. Rev. 43: 177-216.
39. Marshall, D.L. & Ellstrand, N.C. 1986. Sexual selection in Raphanus sativus: experimental data on nonrandom fertilization, maternal choice, and consequences of multiple paternity. Am. Nat. 127: 446-461.
40. McCall, C.T., Mitchell-Olds, T. & Waller, D. 1989. Fitness consequences of outcrossing in Impatiens capensis: tests of the frequency-dependent and sib-competition models. Evolution 43: 1075-1084.
41. Meagher, T.R. 1992. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). I. Genetic variation. Evolution 46: 445-457.
42. Melser, C., Bijleveld, A. & Klinkhamer, P.G. L. 1999. Late-acting inbreeding depression in both male and female function of Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Heredity 83: 162-170.
43. Mitton, J.B. & Grant, M.C. 1984. Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate, and developmental homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 479-499.
44. Pedersen, D.G. 1968. Environmental stress, heterozygote advantage and genotype-environment interaction in Arabidopsis. Heredity 23: 127-138.
45. Ramsey, M. & Vaughton, G. 1998. Effect of environment on the magnitude of inbreeding depression in seed germination in a partially self-fertile perennial herb (Blandifolia grandiflora, Liliaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 159: 98-104.
46. Rausher, M.D. & Chang, S.-M. 1999. Stabilization of mixed-mating systems by differences in the magnitude of inbreeding depression for male and female fitness components. Am Nat. 153: 242-248.
47. Rich, P.M., Ranken, D.M. & George, J.S. 1989. A Manual for Microcomputer Image Analysis. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.
48. Robinson, R.W. Munger, H.M., Whitaker, T.W. & Bohn, G.W. 1979. Genes of the Cucurbitaceae. Hortscience 11: 554-567.
49. Roff, D.A. 1997. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. Chapman and Hall, New York.
50. Schlichtung, C.D. 1986. Environmental stress reduces pollen quantity in Phlox: compounding the fitness deficit. In: Biotechnology and Ecology of Pollen (D. L. Mulcahy, G. B. Mulcahy & E. M. Ottaviano, eds), pp. 483-488. Springer, New York.
51. Schlichting, C.D. & Devlin, B. 1989. Male versus female reproductive success in the hermaphroditic plant Phlox drummondii. Am. Nat. 133: 212-227.
52. Schmitt, J. & Ehrhardt, D.W. 1990. Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 44: 269-278.
53. Schmitt, J. & Gamble, S.E. 1990. The effect of distance from the parental site on offspring performance and inbreeding depression in Impatiens capensis: a test of the local adaptation hypothesis. Evolution 44: 2022-2030.
54. Schultz, S.T. & Willis, J.H. 1995. Individual variation in inbreeding depression: the roles of inbreeding history and mutation. Genetics. 141: 1209-1223.
55. Stephenson, A.G., Lau, T.-C., Quesada, M. & Winsor, J.A. 1992. Factors that affect pollen performance. In: Ecology and Evolution of Plant Reproduction (R. Wyatt, ed), pp. 119-136. Chapman & Hall, New York.
56. Stephenson, A.G., Hayes, C.N., Jóhannsson, M.H. & Winsor, J.A. 2001. The performance of microgametophytes is affected by inbreeding depression and hybrid vigor in the sporophytic generation. Sex. Plant Reprod. 14: 77-83.
57. Tanksley, S.D., Zamir D. & Rick, C.M. 1981. Evidence for extensive overlap of sporophytic and gametiophytic gene expression in Lycopersicon esculentum. Science. 213: 453-455.
58. Uyenoyama, M.K., Holsinger, K.E. & Waller, D.M. 1993. Ecological and genetic factors directing the evolution of self-fertilization. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 9: 327-381.
59. Vogler, D.W., Filmore, K. & Stephenson, A.G. 1999. Inbreeding depression in Campanula rapunculoides L. I. A comparison of inbreeding depression in plants derived from strong and weak self-incompatibility phenotypes. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 483-494.
60. Willing, R.P. & Mascarenhas, J.P. 1984. Analysis of the complexity and diversity of mRNAs from pollen and shoots of Tradescantia. Plant Physiol. 75: 865-868.
61. Willis, J.H. 1993. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on fitness components in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 47: 864-876.
62. Willis, J.H. 1999. The roles of genes of large effect on inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 53: 1678-1691.
63. Wolfe, L. 1993. Inbreeding depression in Hydrophyllum appendiculatum: role of maternal effects, crowding, and parental mating history. Evolution 47: 374-386.
64. Yanofsky, M.F. 1995. Floral meristems to floral organs: genes controlling early events in Arabidopsis flower development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 167-180.