The effect of self-fertilization, inbreeding depression, and population size on autopolyploid establishment

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1867-1875

  Rausch, Joseph H ^a   Morgan, Martin T ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Autopolyploid; Inbreeding depression; Minority cytotype; Relative fitness; Selfing; Unreduced gametes

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; POPULATION SIZE;

EID: 25644446881     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01057.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Baack, E. J. 2004. Cytotype segregation on regional and microgeographic scales in snow buttercups (Ranunculus adoneus: Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot. 91:1783-1788.
2. _. 2005. To succeed globally, disperse locally: effects of local pollen and seed dispersal on tetraploid establishment. Heredity 94:538-546.
3. Barrett, S. C. H., and C. G. Eckert. 1990. Variation and evolution of mating systems in seed plants. Pp. 229-254 in S. Kawano, ed. Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants. Academic Press, Tokyo.
4. Barrett, S. C. H., and B. J. Richardson. 1986. Genetic attributes of invading species. Pp. 21-33 in R. H. Groves and J. J. Burdon, eds. Ecology of biological invasions: an Australian perspective. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra.
5. Bennett, J. H. 1976. Expectations for inbreeding depression on self-fertilization of tetraploids. Biometrics 32:449-452.
6. Bever, J. D., and F. Felber. 1992. The theoretical population genetics of autopolyploidy. Pp. 185-217 in J. Antonovics and D. Futuyma, eds. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
7. Bretagnolle, F., and J. D. Thompson. 1995. Tansley review no. 78. Gametes with the somatic chromosome number: mechanisms of their formation and role in the evolution of autopolyploid plants. New Phytol. 129:1-22.
8. Brown, A. H. D., and D. R. Marshall. 1981. Evolutionary changes accompanying colonization in plants. Pp. 351-363 in G. C. E. Scudder and J. L. Reveal, eds. Evolution today, proceedings of the second international congress of systematic and evolutionary biology. Carnegie-Mellon Univ. Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
9. Burton, T. L., and B. C. Husband. 1999. Population cytotype structure in the polyploid Galax urceolata (Diapensiaceae). Heredity 82:381-390.
10. Butruille, D. V., and L. S. Boiteux. 2000. Selection-mutation balance in polysomic tetraploids: impact of double reduction and gametophytic selection on the frequency and subchromosomal localization of deleterious mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6608-6613.
11. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:237-268.
12. de Nettancourt, D. 2000. Incompatibility and incongruity in wild and cultivated plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
13. Dewey, D. R. 1966. Inbreeding depression in diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid crested wheatgrass. Crop Sci. 6:144-147.
14. Ehrendorfer, F. 1980. Polyploidy and distribution. Pp. 45-60 in W. H. Lewis, ed.Polyploidy: biological relevance. Plenum Press, New York, New York.
15. Felber, F. 1991. Establishment of a tetraploid cytotype in a diploid population: effect of relative fitness of the cytotypes. J. Evol. Biol. 4:195-207.
16. Felber, F., and J. D. Bever. 1997. Effect of triploid fitness on the coexistence of diploids and tetraploids. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 60:95-106.
17. Fowler, N. L., and D. A. Levin. 1984. Ecological constraints on the establishment of a novel polyploid in competition with its diploid progenitor. Am. Nat. 124:703-711.
18. Galloway, L. F., J. R. Etterson, and J. L. Hamrick. 2003. Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in the herbaceous autotetraploid, Campanula americana. Heredity 90:308-315.
19. Grant, V. 1981. Plant Speciation. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
20. Hagberg, A., and S. Ellerström. 1959. The competition between diploid, tetraploid and aneuploid rye. Hereditas 45:369-416.
21. Hardy, O. J., S. Vanderhoeven, M. De Loose, and P. Meerts. 2000. Ecological, morphological and allozymic differentiation between diploid and tetraploid knapweeds (Centaurea jacea) from a contact zone in the Belgian Ardennes. New Phytol. 146:281-290.
22. Harlan, J. R., and J. M. J. de Wet. 1975. On Ö. Winge and a prayer: the origins of polyploidy. Bot. Rev. 41:361-390.
23. Husband, B. C. 2000. Constraints on polyploid evolution: a test of the minority cytotype exclusion principle. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267:217-223.
24. _. 2004. The role of triploid hybrids in the evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82:537-546.
25. Husband, B. C., and H. A. Sabara. 2004. Reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fire-weed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). New Phytol. 161:703-713.
26. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1997. The effect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae): implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Evolution 51:737-746.
27. _. 1998. Cytotype distribution at a diploid-tetraploid contact zone in Chamerion (Epilobium) angustifolium (Onagraceae). Am. J. Bot. 85:1688-1694.
28. Kaul, M. L. H., and T. G. K. Murthy. 1985. Mutant genes affecting higher plant meiosis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 70:449-466.
29. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
30. Levin, D. A. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24:35-43.
31. _. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
32. Li, B. H., X. M. Xu, and M. S. Ridout. 2004. Modelling the establishment and spread of autotetraploid plants in a spatially heterogeneous environment. J. Evol. Biol. 17:562-573.
33. Mable, B. K. 2004. Polyploidy and self-compatibility: Is there an association? New Phytol. 162:803-811.
34. Maceira, N. O., A. A. Dehaan, R. Lumaret, M. Billon, and J. Delay. 1992. Production of 2n gametes in diploid subspecies of Dactylis glomerata L. 1. Occurrence and frequency of 2n pollen. Ann. Bot. 69:335-343.
35. Miller, J. M., and K. L. Chambers. 1993. Nomenclature changes and new taxa in Claytonia (Portulacaceae) in western North America. Novon 3:268-273.
36. Miller, J. S., and D. L. Venable. 2000. Polyploidy and the evolution of gender dimorphism in plants. Science 289:2335-2338.
37. Parrott, W. A., and R. R. Smith. 1984. Production of 2n pollen in red clover. Crop Sci. 24:469-472.
38. Ramsey, J., and D. W. Schemske. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29:467-501.
39. Rodriguez, D. J. 1996a. A model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants. Am. Nat. 147:33-46.
40. _. 1996b. A model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants: viable but infertile hybrids, iteroparity, and demographic stochasticity. J. Theor. Biol. 180:189-196.
41. Ronfort, J. 1999. The mutation load under tetrasomic inheritance and its consequences for the evolution of the selfing rate in autotetraploid species. Genet. Res. 74:31-42.
42. Segraves, K. A., and J. N. Thompson. 1999. Plant polyploidy and pollination: floral traits and insect visits to diploid and tetraploid Heuchera grossulariifolia. Evolution 53:1114-1127.
43. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, and J. A. Tate. 2004. Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant Speciation. New Phytol. 161:173-191.
44. Soltis, P. S., and D. E. Soltis. 2000. The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:7051-7057.
45. Stebbins, G. L. 1947. Types of polyploidy: their classification and significance. Adv. Genet. 1:403-429.
46. _. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
47. _. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold, London.
48. Tate, J. A., and B. B. Simpson. 2004. Breeding system evolution in Tarasa (Malvaceae) and selection for reduced pollen grain size in the polyploid species. Am. J. Bot. 91:207-213.
49. Thompson, J. D., and R. Lumaret. 1992. The evolutionary dynamics of polyploid plants: origins, establishment and persistence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:302-307.
50. Webb, C. J., and D. G. Lloyd. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperme. II. Herkogamy. N. Z. J. Bot. 24:163-178.
51. Winge, Ö. 1917. The chromosomes: their numbers and general importance. CR. Trav. Lab. Carlsberg 13:131-275.
52. Wolfram, S. 1996. The mathematica book. Wolfram Media, Champaign, IL.