Compomers in restorative therapy of children: A literature review

International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 2-9

  Krämer, Norbert ^a,c   Frankenberger, Roland ^b  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOMER;

CHILD; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; REVIEW;

CHILD; COMPOMERS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 33845407017     PISSN: 09607439     EISSN: 1365263X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00803.x     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Pieper K. Epidemiological Evaluation in Group Prophylaxis 2000. German Association for Paediatric Tooth Prophylaxis, Bonn 2001.
2. Robke FJ, Buitkamp M. Nursing bottle caries in children from a German city. Oralprophylaxe 2002; 24: 59-65.
3. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Oral Health of Bavarian School Children 2004. State Community for Oral Health Bavaria, Munich 2005.
4. Bratthall D. Introducing the Significant Caries Index together with a proposal for a new global oral health goal for 12-year-olds. M Dent J 2000; 50: 378-384.
5. Nishi M, Stjernsward J, Carlsson P, Bratthall D. Caries experience of some countries and areas expressed by the Significant Caries Index. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002; 30: 296-301.
6. Ernst CP, Weckmuller C, Willershausen B. Deciduous tooth reconstruction with composite polymers. The ITN care of amelogenesis imperfecta (first dentition) with composite polymeric materials as well as steel crowns - a case report. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995; 105: 664-671.
7. Krejci I, Gebauer L, Hausler T, Lutz F. Composite polymers - an amalgam substitute for deciduous tooth cavities? Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1994; 104: 724-730.
8. Roulet JF. Comparison of three resin composites and amalgam. Zahnärztl Welt 1977; 86: 1055-1062.
9. Ripa LW, Gwinnett AJ, Buonocore MG. The 'prismless' outer layer of deciduous and permanent enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1966; 11: 41-48.
10. Eidelman E. The structure of the enamel in primary teeth: practical applications in restorative techniques. J Dent Child 1976; 43: 172-176.
11. Kodaka T, Nakajima F, Higashi S. Structure of the so-called 'prismless' enamel in human deciduous teeth. Caries Res 1989; 23: 290-296.
12. Whittaker DK. Structural variations in the surface zone of human tooth enamel observed by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 1982; 27: 383-392.
13. Garcia-Godoy F, Gwinnett AJ. Effect of etching times and mechanical pretreatment on the enamel of primary teeth: an SBM study. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 115-1.18.
14. Hosoya Y. The effect of acid etching times on ground primary enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1991; 15: 188-194.
15. Donly KJ, Jensen ME. Posterior composite polymerization shrinkage in primary teeth: an in vitro comparison of three techniques. Pediatr Dent 1986; 8: 209-212.
16. Gwinnett AJ, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of etching time and acid concentration on resin shear bond strength to primary tooth enamel. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 237-239.
17. Smutka S, Jedrychowski J, Caputo A. An evaluation of primary enamel pretreatments and their effects on resin retention. J Dent Res 1978; 57: 796-799.
18. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Jr, Denehy GE, et al. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 44-55.
19. Perdigao JMB, Lopes MM, Ambrose WW. The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 282-295.
20. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20.
21. Berg JH. The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry - a review for the clinician. Pediatr Dent 1998; 20: 93-100.
22. Oulis CJ, Vadiakas GP, Vasilopoulou A. The effectiveness of mandibular infiltration compared to mandibular block anesthesia in treating primary molars in children. Pediatr Dent 1996; 18: 301-305.
23. Lee BB, White GB. Chamfered margin effects on occlusal microleakage of primary molar Class I composite resin, restorations in vitro. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22: 113-116.
24. Sumikawa DA, Marshall GW, Gee L, Marshall SJ. Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21: 439-444.
25. Fritz U, Garcia-Godoy F, Finger WJ. Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth. J Dent Child 1997; 64: 32-38.
26. Malferrari S, Finger WJ, Garcia-Godoy F. Resin bonding efficacy of Gluma 2000 to dentine of primary teeth: an in vitro study. In t J Paediatr Dent 1995; 5: 73-79.
27. Nor JB, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1396-1403.
28. Nor JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the dentin surface in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 1997; 19: 246-252.
29. Kielbassa AM, Attin T, Wrbas K-Th, et al Time-dependent bond strength of restoratives on primary dentin under perfusion. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 52: 119-123.
30. Kielbassa AM, Wrbas KT, Hellwig E. Initial tensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomers and polyacid-modified resins on perfused primary dentin. J Dent Child 1997; 64: 183-187.
31. El-Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of compomers in primary and permanent teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998; 8: 103-114.
32. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Bond strength of different adhesive classes to enamel and dentin in the first and second dentition. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1997; 52: 795-799.
33. Garcia-Godoy F, Hosoya Y. Bonding mechanism of Compoglass to dentin in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22: 217-220.
34. Jumlongras D, White GE. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997; 21: 223-229.
35. De Araujo FB, Garcia-Godoy F, Issao M. A comparison of three resin bonding agents to primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent 1997; 19: 253-257.
36. Megid FY, Salama FS. Shear bond strength of Dyract compomer material to dentin of primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997; 21: 305-310.
37. Salama FS. Gluma bond strength to the dentin of primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1994; 19: 35-40.
38. Royse MC, Ott NW, Mathieu GP. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 1996; 18: 440-443.
39. Elkins CJ, McCourt JW. Bond strength of dentinal adhesives in primary teeth. Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 271-273.
40. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Resindentin adhesion to caries-affected dentin. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1999; 54: 455-458.
41. Mazzeo N, Ott NW, Hondrum SO. Resin bonding to primary teeth using three adhesive systems. Pediatr Dent 1995; 17: 112-115.
42. El-Kalla IH. Marginal adaptation of compomers in Class I and V cavities in primary molars. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 37-43.
43. Turgut MD, Tekcicek M, Olmez S. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite under different conditioning methods in primary teeth. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 515-523.
44. Casagrande L, De HV, Goes MF, de Araujo FB. Bond strength and interfacial morphology of two adhesive systems to deciduous dentin: in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005; 29: 317-322.
45. Sardella TN, de Castro FL, Sanabe ME, Hebling J. Shortening of primary dentin etching time and its implication on bond strength. J Dent 2005; 33: 355-362.
46. Schaller HG, Kielbassa AM, Hahn P, et al. Bond strength to caries-affected dentin. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1998; 53: 69-72.
47. Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Marshall GW, Jr, Goto G. Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin. J Dent 2001; 29: 163-171.
48. Hosoya Y, Shinkawa H, Marshall GW. Influence of Carisolv on resin adhesion for two different adhesive systems to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin. J Dent 2005; 33: 283-291.
49. Olmez A, Oztas N, Basak F, Erdal S. Comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998; 22: 293-298.
50. Bordin-Aykroyd S, Sefton J, Davies EH. In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 74-78.
51. Salama FS, Tao L. Comparison of Gluma bond strength to primary vs. permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 1991; 13: 163-166.
52. Truter MJ, van der Vyver PJ, Nel JC. Bond strength of composite resin bonded to deciduous and permanent dentin. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1996; 51: 521-524.
53. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 188-196.
54. Roeters JJ, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk RC, Peters TC. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 143-148.
55. Andersson-Wenckert IE, Folkesson UH, van Dijken JW. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 255-260.
56. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos B, et al. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 198-211.
57. Buerkle V, Kuehnisch J, Guelmann M, Hickel R. Restoration materials for primary molars-results from a European survey. J Dent 2005; 33: 275-281.
58. Mass E, Gordon M, Fuks AB. Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: a retrospective study in children. J Dent Child 1999; 66: 93-97.
59. Marks LA, Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE, et al. Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res 1999; 33: 387-392.
60. Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Sharma NK. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation. Br Dent J 2002; 193: 339-342.
61. Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26: 245-250.
62. Marks LA, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ, et al. Ketac Molar versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results. J Dent Child 2000; 67: 37-39.
63. Louw AJ, Sarvan I, Chikte UM, Honkala E. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth. J Dent Assoc S Afri 2002; 57: 366-371.
64. Welbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 93-97.
65. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Bucballa W, Schulte Mönting J. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 148-152.
66. Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: I-year results. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 1088-1096.
67. Gross LC, Griffen AL, Casamassimo PS. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23: 24-27.
68. Krejci I, Wiedmer CS, Lutz F. Compomers in primary molars after two years. Helv Odontol Acta 1998; 3: 48-53.
69. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study. Pediatr Dent 1999; 21: 231-234.
70. Wendt LK, Koch G, Birkhed D. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition. Swed Dent J 1998; 22: 149-155.
71. Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23: 481-486.
72. Da Silva Telles PD, Aparecida M, Machado M, Nor JE. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23: 315-320.
73. Torres CP, Corona SA, Ramos RP, et al. Bond strength of self-etching primer and total-etch adhesive systems to primary dentin. J Dent Child 2004; 71: 131-134.
74. Atash R, Van den AA. Bond strengths of eight contemporary adhesives to enamel and to dentine: an in vitro study on bovine primary teeth. Int J Pediatr Dent 2005; 15: 264-273.
75. Groll TP. MagicFil: a colorful kiddie compomer. Campend Contin Educ Dent 2002; 23: 1044-1048.
76. Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 511-516.
77. Mortada A, King NM. A simplified, technique for the restoration of severely mutilated primary anterior teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2004; 28: 187-192.
78. Kupietzky A, Waggoner WE, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27: 221-225.
79. Krämer N. Modern restorative therapy in paediatric dentistry. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1997; 52: 89-99.