Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam in primary teeth Class II restorations: A 2-year comparative study

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 245-250

  Kavvadia, Katerina ^a   Kakaboura, Afrodite ^a   Vanderas, Apostole P ^a   Papagiannoulis, Liza ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Class II restorations; Compomer; Primary molars

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DENTAL ALLOY; EPOXY RESIN; DISPERSALLOY; F2000 CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER;

ARTICLE; CHILD; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOLAR TOOTH; MOUTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURFACE PROPERTY;

CHILD; COMPOMERS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RECURRENCE; REPLICA TECHNIQUES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 3843129786     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions. Am J Dent. 1997;10:18-20.
2. García-Godoy F. Resin based composites and compomers in primary molars. Dent Clin North Am. 2000;44:541-569.
3. Burke FG, Fleming GJ, Owen FJ, Watson DJ. Materials for restoration of primary teeth: Glass ionomer derivatives and compomers. Dent Update. 2002;29:10-14, 16-17.
4. Peters TCRB, Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen FWA. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: One-year results. Am J Dent. 1996;9:83-87.
5. Anderson-Wenckert IE, Folkesson UH, Van Dijken JWV. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997;55:255-260.
6. Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: One-year results. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997;128:1088-1096.
7. Roeters J, Frankenmolen F, Burgersdijk R, Peters T. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: Three-year results. Am J Dent. 1998;11:143-148.
8. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: A two-year follow up study. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21:231-234.
9. Marks LAM, Weerheijm KL, Van Amerongen WE, Groen HJ, Martens LC. Dyract vs Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars, 36 months evaluation. Caries Res. 1999;33:387-392.
10. Wellbury RR, Shaw AJ, Murray JJ, Gordan PH, McCabe JF. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: Final results after 42 months. Br Dent J. 2000;189:93-97.
11. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Monting J. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: Results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2000;25:259-264.
12. Marks LAM, Van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer P, Groen HJ, Martens LC. Ketac molar vs Dyract class II restorations in primary molars: 12-month clinical results. J Dent Child. 2000;22:37-40.
13. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Monting J. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent. 2001;14:148-152.
14. Gross L, Griffen A, Cassamassimo P. Compomers as Class II restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2001;23:24-27.
15. Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Sharma NK. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: A 24-month evaluation. Br Dent J. 2002;193:339-342.
16. Houpt M. Project TAPP, Task Analysis of Procedures in Pedodontics, United States Public Health Service Final Report. (litho), 1975.
17. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J. 1980;30:347-358.
18. Breschi L, Gobbi P, Falconi M, Ciavarelli L, Teti G, Mazzati G. Evaluation of the F2000 bonding procedure: A high resolution SEM study. J Dent. 2001;29:499-507.
19. Muller U, Kiebassa A, Schulle-Monting J, Hellwig E. Fluoride release from light-curing restorative materials. Am J Dent. 2000;13:301-304.
20. Barr-Agholme M, Odén A, Dahllof G, Modeér T. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Dent Mater. 1991;7:230-233.
21. Ozer L, Thylstrup A. What is known about caries in relation to restorations as a reason for replacement? A review. Adv Dent Res. 1995;9:394-402.