Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university-industry relationships drive economic growth

Research Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1499-1508

  Mueller, Pamela ^a  

^a Growth and Public Policy   (Germany)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurship; Knowledge; Regional growth

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INVENTORY CONTROL; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; KNOWLEDGE STOCKS; REGIONAL GROWTH;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33751347062     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Braunerhjelm P., and Carlsson B. The Knowledge Filter and Entrepreneurship in Endogenous Growth. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, No. 08 (2005), Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany
2. Acs Z.J., and Varga A. Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change. Small Business Economics 24 (2005) 323-334
3. Adams J.D., Chiang E.P., and Starkey K. Industry-university cooperative research centers. Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (2001) 73-86
4. Agarwal R., Echambadi R., Franco A.M., and Sarkar M.B. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: spin-out generation, development and survival. Academy of Management Journal 47 (2004) 501-522
5. Almus M., Engel D., and Prantl S. Die Mannheimer Gründungspanels des Zentrums für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (ZEW). In: Fritsch, Michael, and Reinhold G. (Eds). Das Gründungsgeschehen in Deutschland, Darstellung und Vergleich der Datenquellen (2002), Physica, Heidelberg 79-102
6. Anselin L., Varga A., and Acs Z.J. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics 42 (1997) 422-448
7. Anselin L., Varga A., and Acs Z.J. Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science 79 (2000) 435-448
8. Arora, A., Ceccagnoli, M., Cohen, W.M., 2005. R&D and the patent premium. NBER Working Paper No. 9431, revised version January 2005.
9. Arundel A., and Geuna A. Proximity and the use of public science by innovative european firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13 (2004) 559-580
10. Audretsch D.B. Innovation and Industry Evolution (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge
11. Audretsch D.B., and Feldman M.P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation. American Economic Review 86 (1996) 630-640
12. Audretsch D.B., and Keilbach M. Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies 38 (2004) 949-960
13. Audretsch D.B., and Keilbach M. Entrepreneurship and regional growth: an evolutionary interpretation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14 (2004) 605-616
14. Audretsch D.B., and Lehmann E.E. Mansfield's missing link: the impact of knowledge spillovers on firm growth. Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (2005) 207-210
15. Audretsch, D.B., Keilbach, M.C., Lehmann, E.E., 2006. Entrepreneurship and economic growth, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Beise M., and Stahl H. Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research Policy 28 (1999) 397-422
17. Bercovitz J., and Feldman M. Fishing upstream: firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Paper Presented at the DRUID Conference Summer 2005 (2005)
18. Biddle J., and Roberts K. Private sector scientists and engineers and the transition to management. Journal of Human Resources 29 (1993) 82-107
19. Buenstorf, G., Klepper, S., 2005. Heritage and agglomeration: the Akron tire cluster revisited. Papers on Economics and Evolution #0508. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany.
20. Christensen C.M. The rigid disk drive industry: a history of commercial and technological turbulence. Business History Review 67 (1993) 531-588
21. Cohen W.M. Patens and appropriation: concerns and evidence. Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (2005) 57-71
22. Cohen W.M., and Levinthal D.A. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 99 (1989) 569-596
23. Cohen W.M., and Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1990) 128-152
24. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R., Walsh, J., 2002a. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper w7752, National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA.
25. Cohen W.M., Nelson R., and Walsh J. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science 48 (2002) 1-23
26. Czarnitzki D., and Rammer C. Innovationsimpulse aus der Wissenschaft-Ergebnisse aus der Innovationserhebung. In: Schmoch U., Licht G., and Reinhard M. (Eds). Wissens-und Technologietransfer in Deutschland (2000), Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart 271-282
27. Dahl, M.C., Pedersen, C.Ø.R., Dalum, B., 2003. Entry by spinoff in a high-tech cluster, Druid Working Paper No. 03-11.
28. European Commission (EC), 2001. Benchmarking industry-science relations-the role of framework conditions. Final Report Commissioned by DG Enterprise and the Federal Ministry of Economy and Labour, Austria.
29. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy 27 (1998) 823-833
30. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29 (2000) 109-123
31. Franco, A.M., Filson, D., 2000. Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. Working Paper, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
32. Fritsch M. Entrepreneurship, entry and performance of new businesses compared in two growth regimes: East and West Germany. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14 (2004) 525-542
33. Fritsch M., and Brixy U. The establishment file of the German social insurance statistics. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies 124 (2004) 183-190
34. Fritsch M., and Lukas R. Who cooperates on R&D?. Research Policy 30 (2001) 297-312
35. Fritsch M., and Niese M. Vergleichende Gegenüberstellung der Informationen zum Gründungsgeschehen. In: Fritsch M., and Grotz R. (Eds). Das Gründungsgeschehen in Deutschland, Darstellung und Vergleich der Datenquellen (2002), Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg 141-164
36. Fritsch M., and Schwirten C. Enterprise-university co-operation and the role of public research institutions in regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation 6 (1999) 69-83
37. Garvin D.A. Spin-offs and the new firm formation process. California Management Review 25 (1983) 3-20
38. Geroski P. What do we know about entry?. International Journal of Industrial Organization 13 (1995) 421-440
39. Glaeser E., Kallal H.D., Scheinkaman J.A., and Shleifer A. Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy 100 (1992) 1126-1152
40. Di Gregrio D., and Shane S. Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?. Research Policy 32 (2002) 209-227
41. Hall B.H., Link A.N., and Scott J.T. Universities as research partners. The Review of Economics and Statistic 85 (2003) 485-491
42. Henderson V., Kuncoro A., and Turner M. Industrial development in cities. Journal of Political Economy 103 (1995) 1067-1090
43. Hertzfeld H.R., Link A.N., and Vonortas N.S. Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms in Research Partnerships. Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy (2005), Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany
44. Hippel E.v. Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading. Research Policy 16 (1987) 291-302
45. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., and Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (1993) 577-598
46. Klepper S., and Sleeper S. Entry by spinoffs. Management Science 51 (2005) 1291-1306
47. Kronthaler F. Economic capability of east German regions: results of a cluster analysis. Regional Studies 39 (2005) 739-750
48. Laurensen K., and Salter A. Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?. Research Policy 33 (2004) 1201-1215
49. Lucas R.E. On the mechanism of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22 (1988) 3-42
50. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 20 (1991) 1-12
51. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Research Policy 26 (1998) 773-776
52. Mansfield E., and Lee J.-Y. The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy 25 (1996) 1047-1058
53. Maskell P., and Malmberg A. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23 (1999) 167-175
54. Meyer M. Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research based ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Management 33 (2003) 107-115
55. Meyer-Krahmer F., and Schmoch U. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy 27 (1998) 835-851
56. Pavitt K.L.R. Public policies to support basic research: what can the rest of the world learn form US theory and practice? (and what they should learn). Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (2001) 761-779
57. Plummer L.A., and Acs Z.J. Penetrating the "Knowledge Filter" in regional economies. Annals of Regional Science 39 (2005) 439-456
58. Romer P.M. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94 (1986) 71-102
59. Romer P.M. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990) 1002-1037
60. Rosenberg N., and Nelson R.R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 23 (1994) 323-348
61. Schmidt, T., 2005. Knowledge flows and R&D co-operation: firm-level evidence from Germany, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 05-22, ZEW, Mannheim.
62. Scott J.T. Absorptive capacity and the efficiency of research partnerships. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (2003) 247-253
63. Senker J. Tacit knowledge and models of innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 2 (1995) 425-447
64. Spencer J.W. How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States-Japan comparison. Academy of Management Journal 44 (2001) 432-440
65. Sull, D.N., 2001. From community of innovation to community of inertia: the rise and fall of the Akron tire cluster, Havard Business School, Working Paper No. 025.
66. Varga A., and Schalk J. Knowledge spillovers, agglomeration and macroeconomic growth: an empirical approach. Regional Studies 38 (2004) 977-989
67. Zellner C. The economic effects of basic research: evidence for embodied knowledge transfer via scientists' migration. Research Policy 32 (2003) 1881-1895
68. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., and Brewer M.B. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review 88 (1998) 290-306