Linking floral symmetry genes to breeding system evolution

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 11, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 568-573

  Kalisz, Susan ^a   Ree, Richard H ^b   Sargent, Risa D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; BREEDING; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MORPHOGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANGIOSPERMS; BODY PATTERNING; BREEDING; EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; PHYLOGENY;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 33751218305     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Endress P.K. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers (1994), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
2. Endress P.K. Symmetry in flowers: diversity and evolution. Int. J. Plant Sci. 160 (1999) S3-S23
3. Donoghue M.J., et al. Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends Plant Sci. 3 (1998) 311-317
4. Ree R.H., and Donoghue M.J. Inferring rates of change in flower symmetry in asterid angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 48 (1999) 633-641
5. Endress P.K. Evolution of floral symmetry. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4 (2001) 86-91
6. Cubas P. Floral zygomorphy, the recurring evolution of a successful trait. Bioessays 26 (2004) 1175-1184
7. Smith F.F., et al. A phylogenetic analysis within tribes Gloxinieae and Gesnerieae (Gesnerioideae: Gesneriaceae). Syst. Bot. 29 (2004) 947-958
8. Sargent R.D. Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 271 (2004) 603-608
9. Cronk Q.C.B., and Moller M. Genetics of floral symmetry revealed. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12 (1997) 85-86
10. Neal P.R., and Anderson G.J. Are 'mating systems' 'breeding systems' of inconsistent and confusing terminology in plant reproductive biology? Or is it the other way around?. Plant Syst. Evol. 250 (2005) 173-185
11. Hileman L.C., and Baum D.A. Why do paralogs persist? Molecular evolution of CYCLOIDEA and related floral symmetry genes in Antirrhineae (Veronicaceae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 20 (2003) 591-600
12. Grant V. Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in angiosperms. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 3 (1949) 82-97
13. Stebbins G.L. Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level (1974), Harvard University Press
14. Fenster C.B., et al. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 35 (2004) 375-403
15. Barrett S.C.H. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3 (2002) 274-284
16. Lloyd D.G., and Webb C.J. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms I. Dichogamy. N.Z. J. Bot. 24 (1986) 135-162
17. Bertin R.I., and Newman C.M. Dichogamy in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 59 (1993) 112-159
18. Barrett S.C.H. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London B 358 (2003) 991-1004
19. Harder L.D., et al. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 267 (2000) 315-320
20. Routley M.B., and Husband B.C. The effect of protandry on siring success in Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae) with different inflorescence sizes. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 57 (2003) 240-248
21. Routley M.B., et al. Correlated evolution of dichogamy and self-incompatibility: a phylogenetic perspective. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165 (2004) 983-993
22. Routley M.B., and Husband B.C. Responses to selection on male-phase duration in Chamerion angustifolium. J. Evol. Biol. 18 (2005) 1050-1059
23. Wyatt R. Plant-pollinator interactions and the evolution of breeding systems. In: Real L. (Ed). Pollination Biology (1983), Academic Press 51-95
24. Luo D., et al. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383 (1996) 794-799
25. Cubas P., et al. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401 (1999) 157-161
26. Reeves P.A., and Olmstead R.G. Evolution of novel morphological and reproductive traits in a clade containing Antirrhinum majus (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85 (1998) 1047-1056
27. Sargent R.D., and Otto S.P. A phylogenetic analysis of pollination mode and the evolution of dichogamy in angiosperms. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6 (2004) 1183-1199
28. Schwarz-Sommer Z., et al. An everlasting pioneer: the story of Antirrhinum research. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4 (2003) 657-666
29. Costa M.M.R., et al. Evolution of regulatory interactions controlling floral asymmetry. Development 132 (2005) 5093-5101
30. Feng X., et al. Control of petal shape and floral zygomorphy in Lotus japonicus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103 (2006) 4970-4975
31. Luo D., et al. Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell 99 (1999) 367-376
32. Citerne H.L., et al. Diversity of CYCLOIDEA-like genes in Gesneriaceae in relation to floral symmetry. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 86 (2000) 167-176
33. Cubas P., et al. Ancient asymmetries in the evolution of flowers. Curr. Biol. 11 (2001) 1050-1052
34. Citerne H.L., et al. An apparent reversal in floral symmetry in the legume Cadia is a homeotic transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 32 (2006) 1217-1220
35. Darwin C. The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species (1877), John Murray, London, UK
36. Barrett S.C.H., et al. Heterostyly in the Lamiaceae: the case of Salvia brandegeei. Plant Syst. Evol. 223 (2000) 211-219
37. Rodriguez I., et al. Symmetry in the eye of the 'beeholder': innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naive bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 91 (2004) 374-377
38. Leppik E.E. The ability of insects to distinguish number. Am. Nat. 87 (1957) 229-236
39. Laverty T.M. The flower visiting behaviour of bumble-bees: floral complexity and learning. Can. J. Zool. 58 (1980) 1324-1335
40. Armbruster W.S., et al. Floral character displacement generates assemblage structure of Western Australian triggerplants (Stylidium). Ecology 75 (1994) 315-329
41. Stiles F.G. Ecological and evolutionary implications of bird pollination. Am. Zool. 18 (1978) 715-727
42. Davenport D., and Lee H. Image analysis of the Orchidaceae. J. Theor. Biol. 114 (1985) 199-222
43. Cubas P., et al. The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J. 18 (1999) 215-222
44. Corley S.B., et al. Floral asymmetry involves an interplay between TO and MYB transcription factors in Antirrhinum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 5068-5073
45. Almeida J., et al. Genetic control of flower shape in Antirrhinum majus. Development 124 (1997) 1387-1392
46. Galego L., and Almeida J. Role of DIVARICATA in the control of dorsoventral asymmetry in Antirrhinum flowers. Genes Dev. 16 (2002) 880-891
47. Hileman L.C., et al. Differential regulation of symmetry genes and the evolution of floral morphologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 12814-12819
48. Neal P.R., et al. Floral symmetry and its role in plant-pollinator systems: terminology, distribution, and hypotheses. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29 (1998) 345-373