Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the asteridae

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 3, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 311-317

  Donoghue, Michael J ^a   Ree, Richard H ^a   Baum, David A ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASTERIDS;

EID: 0031926032     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01278-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Coen E.S., Meyerowitz E.M. The war of the whorls - genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature. 353:1991;31-37.
2. Weigel D., Meyerowitz E.M. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell. 78:1994;203-209.
3. Theissen G., Kim J.T., Saedler H. Classification and phylogeny of the MADS-box multigene family suggest defined roles of MADS-box gene subfamilies in the morphological evolution of eukaryotes. J. Mol. Evol. 43:1996;484-516.
4. Mena M.et al. Diversification of C-function activity in maize flower development. Science. 274:1996;1537-1540.
5. Endress P.K. Evolution of floral diversity: the phylogenetic surroundings of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:1992;S106-S122.
6. Endress, P.K. (1994) Diversity and Evolutionary Biology of Tropical Flowers, Cambridge University Press.
7. Endress, P.K. Antirrhinum and Asteridae - evolutionary changes of floral symmetry, Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. (in press).
8. Carpenter R., Coen E.S. Floral homeotic mutations produced by transposon mutagenesis in Antirrhinum majus. Genes Dev. 4:1990;1483-1493.
9. Coen E.S., Nugent J. Evolution of flowers and inflorescences. Development. Suppl. 1994;107-116.
10. Coen E.S.et al. Evolution of floral symmetry. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 350:1995;35-38.
11. Luo D.et al. Origin of floral symmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature. 383:1996;794-799.
12. Almeida J., Rocheta M., Galego L. Genetic control of flower shape in Antirrhinum majus. Development. 124:1997;1387-1392.
13. Cronquist, A. (1988) The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants (2nd edn), New York Botanical Garden.
14. Stebbins, G.L. (1974) Flowering Plants: Evolution Above the Species Level, Harvard University Press.
15. Takhtajan, A. (1991) Evolutionary Trends in Flowering Plants, Columbia University Press.
16. Plunkett G.M., Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S. Higher level relationships of Apiales (Apiaceae and Araliaceae) based on phylogenetic analysis of rbcL sequences. Am. J. Bot. 83:1996;499-515.
17. Kron K.A., Chase M.W. Systematics of the Ericaceae, Empetraceae, Epacridaceae and related taxa based upon rbcL sequence data. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 80:1993;735-741.
18. Soltis D.E., Xiang Q-Y., Hufford L. Relationships and evolution of Hydrangeaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Am. J. Bot. 82:1995;504-514.
19. Wagstaff S.J., Olmstead R.G. Phylogeny of Labiatae and Verbenaceae inferred from rbcL sequences. Syst. Bot. 22:1997;165-179.
20. Bremer B., Jansen R.K. Comparative restriction site mapping of chloroplast DNA implies new phylogenetic relationships within Rubiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 78:1991;198-213.
21. Olmstead R.G., Palmer J.D. A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Solanaceae: subfamilial relationships and character evolution. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 79:1992;346-360.
22. Olmstead R.G.et al. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based on rbcL sequences. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 80:1993;700-722.
23. Rice K.A., Donoghue M.J., Olmstead R.G. Analyzing large data sets: rbcL 500 revisited. Syst. Biol. 46:1997;554-562.
24. Maddison W. Reconstructing character evolution on polytomous cladograms. Cladistics. 5:1989;365-377.
25. Donoghue M.J., Ackerly D.D. Phylogenetic uncertainties and sensitivity analyses in comparative biology. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B. 351:1996;1241-1249.
26. Ree, R.H. and Donoghue, M.J. Step matrices and the interpretation of homoplasy, Syst. Biol. (in press).
27. Cronk Q., Moller M. Genetics of floral symmetry revealed. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:1997;85-86.
28. Reeves, P.A. and Olmstead, R.G. Evolution of novel morphological and reproductive traits in a clade containing Antirrhinum majus (Scrophulariaceae), Am. J. Bot. (in press).
29. Kampny C.M., Dickinson T.A., Dengler N.G. Quantitative comparison of floral development in Veronica chamaedrys and Veronicastrum virgincum. Am. J. Bot. 80:1993;449-460.
30. Burtt B.L. Studies in the Gesneriaceae of the Old World. XXXI. Some aspects of functional evolution. Notes R. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 30:1970;1-10.
31. Chen J-J.et al. A gene fusion at a homeobox locus: alterations in leaf shape and implications for morphological evolution. Plant Cell. 9:1997;1289-1304.
32. Weberling, F. (1989) Morphology of Flowers and Inflorescences, Cambridge University Press.
33. Eichler, A.W. (1875) Bluthendiagramme I, Engelmann.
34. Breindl M. Zur Kenntis der Baumechanik des Blütenkelches de Dikotylen. Bot. Arch. 36:1934;192-268.
35. Running M.P., Meyerowitz E.M. Mutations in the PERIANTHIA gene of Arabidopsis specifically alter organ number and initiation pattern. Development. 122:1996;1261-1269.
36. Baum D.A. The evolution of plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1:1998;79-86.