Why do paralogs persist? Molecular evolution of CYCLOIDEA and related floral symmetry genes in Antirrhineae (Veronicaceae)

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 591-600

  Hileman, Lena C ^a,b   Baum, David A ^a,c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Antirrhinum majus; CYCLOIDEA, DICHOTOMA; Gene duplication; Nonsynonymous synonymous rate ratio; Snapdragon

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CODON; CYCLOIDEA GENE; DICHOTOMA GENE; FLOWER; GENE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT GENETICS;

ANTIRRHINUM; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FLOWERS; GENE DUPLICATION; GENES, PLANT; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT PROTEINS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANTIRRHINEAE; ANTIRRHINUM; ANTIRRHINUM MAJUS; EMBRYOPHYTA; PLANTAGINACEAE;

EID: 0037387371     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg063     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bailey, G. S., T. M. Poulter, and P. A. Stockwell. 1978. Gene duplication in tetraploid fish: model for gene silencing at unlinked duplicated loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75: 5575-5579.
2. Bielawski, J. P., and Z. Yang. 2001. Positive and negative selection in the DAZ gene family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:523-529.
3. Bradley, R. D., and D. M. Hillis. 1997. Recombinant DNA sequences generated by PCR amplification. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:592-593.
4. Citerne, H. L., M. Moller, and Q. C. B. Cronk. 2000. Diversity of cycloidea-like genes in Gesneriaceae in relation to floral symmetry. Ann. Bot. 86:167-176.
5. Coen, E. S., and J. M. Nugent. 1994. Evolution of flowers and inflorescences. Development S(Suppl.):107-116.
6. Cubas, P., N. Lauter, J. Doebley, and E. Coen. 1999. The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J. 18:215-222.
7. Cubas, P., C. Vincent, and E. Coen. 1999. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401:157-161.
8. Donoghue, M. J., R. H. Ree, and D. A. Baum. 1998. Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends Plant Sci. 3:311-317.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
10. -. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
11. Force, A, M. Lynch, F. B. Pickett, A. Amores, Y. L. Yan, and J. Postlethwait. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531-1545.
12. Goldman, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:182-198.
13. Goldman, N., and Z. Yang. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:725-736.
14. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and B. Rannala. 1997. Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276:227-232.
15. Kishino, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
16. Krakauer, D. C., and M. A. Nowak. 1999. Evolutionary preservation of redundant duplicated genes. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:555-559.
17. Larson, A. 1994. The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. Pp. 371-390 in B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. Desalle, eds. Molecular ecology and evolution: approaches and applications. Birkhäuser Verlag. Basel, Switzerland.
18. Luo, D., R. Carpenter, L. Copsey, C. Vincent, J. Clark, and E. Coen. 1999. Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell 99:367-376.
19. Luo, D., R. Carpenter, C. Vincent, L. Copsey, and E. Coen. 1996. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383:794-799.
20. Lynch, M., and J. S. Conery. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151-1155.
21. Lynch, M., and A. Force. 2000. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154:459-473.
22. Lynch, M., M. O'Hely, B. Walsh, and A. Force. 2001. The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate. Genetics 159:1789-1804.
23. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 1999. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
24. Mason-Gamer, R. J., and E. A. Kellogg. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45:524-545.
25. Nei, M., and A. K. Roychoudhury. 1973. Probability of fixation of nonfunctional genes at duplicate loci. Am. Nat. 107:362-372.
26. Nowak, M. A., M. C. Boerlijst, J. Cooke, and J. M. Smith. 1997. Evolution of genetic redundancy. Nature 388:167-171.
27. Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
28. Ohta, T. 1973. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature 246:96-98.
29. -. 1988. Evolution by gene duplication and compensatory advantageous mutations. Genetics 120:841-847.
30. -. 1993. Amino acid substitution at the Adh locus of Drosophila is facilitated by small population size, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:4548-4551.
31. Olmstead, R. G., C. W. DePamphilis, A. D. Wolfe, N. D. Young, W. J. Elisons, and P. A. Reeves. 2001. Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. Am. J. Bot. 88:348-361.
32. Sanderson, M. J., and J. A. Doyle. 2001. Sources of error and confidence intervals in estimating the age of angiosperms from rbcL and 18S rDNA data. Am. J. Bot. 88:1499-1516.
33. Stoltzfus, A. 1999. On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 49:169-181.
34. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
35. Templeton, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
36. Thomas, J. H. 1993. Thinking about genetic redundancy. Trends Genet. 9:395-399.
37. Vieira, C. P., J. Vieira, and D. Charlesworth. 1999. Evolution of the Cycloidea gene family in Antirrhinum and Misopates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1474-1483.
38. Walsh, J. B. 1995. How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions? Genetics 139:421-428.
39. Yang, Z. 1994a. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:105-111.
40. -. 1994b. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
41. -. 1998. Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:568-573.
42. -. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood (PAML). University College London, London, England (http://abacus.gene.ucl.ac.uk/software/paml.html).
43. Yang, Z., N. Goldman, and A. Friday. 1995. Maximum likelihood trees from DNA sequences: a peculiar statistical estimation problem. Syst. Biol. 44:384-399.
44. Yang, Z., and R. Nielsen. 1998. Synonymous and nonsynonymous rate variation in nuclear genes of mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 46:409-418.