The effect of protandry on siring success in chamerion angustifolium (onagraceae) with different inflorescence sizes

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 240-248

  Routley, Matthew B ^a   Husband, Brian C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dichogamy; Geitonogamy; Inflorescence size; Interference avoidance; Male reproductive success; Pollen discounting; Protandry

Indexed keywords

FLORAL TRAIT; POLLEN; PROTANDRY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

APOIDEA; CHAMERION; CHAMERION ANGUSTIFOLIUM; EPILOBIUM; ONAGRACEAE;

EID: 0037297394     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00259.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abacus Concepts. 1991. SuperANOVA® user's guide. Ver. 1.11. Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA.
2. Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. Sexual interference of the floral kind. Heredity 88:154-159.
3. Barrett, S. C. H., L. D. Harder, and W. W. Cole. 1994. Effects of flower number and position on self-fertilization in experimental populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Funct. Ecol. 8:526-535.
4. Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 224:223-265.
5. Benham, B. R. 1969. Insect visitors to Chamaenerion angustifolium and their behaviour in relation to pollination. Entomologist 102:221-228.
6. Bertin, R. I., and C. M. Newman. 1993. Dichogamy in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 59:112-152.
7. Brunet, J., and C. G. Eckert. 1998. Effects of floral morphology and display on outcrossing in blue columbine, Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Funct. Ecol. 12:596-606.
8. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:237-268.
9. Darwin, C. 1862. On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects. Murray, London.
10. de Jong, T. J., N. M. Waser, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:321-325.
11. Eckert, C. G., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1993. Clonal reproduction and patterns of genotypic diversity in Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Am. J. Bot. 80:1175-1182.
12. Emms, S. K., D. A. Stratton, and A. A. Snow. 1997. The effect of inflorescence size on male fitness: experimental tests in the andromonoecious lily, Zigadenus paniculatus. Evolution 51:1481-1489.
13. Empix Imaging. 1996. Northern eclipse. Ver. 5.0. Empix Imaging, Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
14. Galen, C., and R. C. Plowright. 1988. Contrasting movement patterns of nectar-collecting and pollen-collecting bumble bees (Bombus terricola) on fireweed (Chamaenerion angustifolium) inflorescences. Ecol. Entomol. 10:9-17.
15. Galloway, L. F., T. Cirigliano, and K. Gremski. 2002. The contribution of display size and dichogamy to potential geitonogamy in Campanula americana. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163:133-139.
16. Geber, M. A. 1985. The relationship of plant size to self-pollination in Mertensia ciliata. Ecology 66:762-772.
17. Griffin, S. R., K. Mavraganis, and C. G. Eckert. 2000. Experimental analysis of protogyny in Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87:1246-1256.
18. Harder, L. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373:512-515.
19. _. 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. Pp. 140-190 in D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York.
20. Harder, L. D., and J. D. Thomson. 1989. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. Am. Nat 133:323-344.
21. Harder, L. D., and W. G. Wilson. 1998. A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution. Am. Nat. 152:684-695.
22. Harder, L. D., S. C. H. Barrett, and W. W. Cole. 2000. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:315-320.
23. Hebert, P. D. N., and M. J. Beaton. 1989. Methodologies for allozyme analysis using cellulose acetate electrophoresis: a practical handbook. Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TX.
24. Holsinger, K. E. 1996. Pollination biology and the evolution of mating systems in flowering plants. Evol. Biol. 29:107-149.
25. Holtsford, T. P., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1992. Genetic and environmental variation in floral traits affecting outcrossing rate in Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). Evolution 46:216-225.
26. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1995. Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in a diploid population of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Heredity 75:206-215.
27. _. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
28. _. 1997. The effect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae): implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Evolution 51:737-746.
29. _. 2000. Ecological mechanisms of reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. J. Ecol. 88:689-701.
30. Iwasa, Y., T. J. de Jong, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1995. Why pollinators visit only a fraction of the open flowers on a plant: the plant's point of view. J. Evol. Biol. 8:439-453.
31. Klinkhamer, P. G. L., and T. J. de Jong. 1990. Effects of plant size, plant density and sex differential nectar reward on pollinator visitation in the protandrous Echium vulgare. Oikos 57:399-405.
32. _. 1993. Attractiveness to pollinators: a plant's dilemma. Oikos 66:180-184.
33. Lloyd, D. G. 1984. Gender allocations in outcrossing cosexual plants. Pp. 277-300 in R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhan, eds. Perspectives on plant population ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
34. Lloyd, D. G., and D. J. Schoen. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:358-369.
35. Lloyd, D. G., and C. J. Webb. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms: I. Dichogamy. NZ J. Bot. 24:135-162.
36. Mosquin, T. 1967. Evidence for autopolyploidy in Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Evolution 21:713-719.
37. Myerscough, P. J. 1980. Biological flora of the British Isles. No. 148. Epilobium angustifolium L. (Chamaenerion angustifolium (L.) Scop.). J. Ecol. 68:1047-1074.
38. Neter, J., M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman. 1996. Applied linear statistical models. 4th ed. WCB/McGraw Hill, Boston, MA.
39. Queller, D. C. 1983. Sexual selection in a hermaphroditic plant. Nature 305:706-707.
40. Rademaker, M. C. J., T. J. de Jong, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1997. Pollen dynamics of bumble-bee visitation on Echium vulgare. Funct. Ecol. 11:554-563.
41. Ritland, K. 1986. Joint maximum likelihood estimation of genetic and mating structure using open-pollinated progenies. Biometrics 42:25-44.
42. Robertson, A. W. 1992. The relationship between floral display size, pollen carryover and geitonogamy in Myosotis colensoi (Kirk) Macbride (Boraginaceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 46:333-349.
43. Schemske, D. W. 1980. Evolution of floral display in the orchid Brassavola nodosa. Evolution 34:489-491.
44. Schmid-Hempel, P., and B. Speiser. 1988. Effects of inflorescence size on pollination in Epilobium angustifolium. Oikos 53:98-104.
45. Schoen, D. J. 1982. The breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia: variation in floral characteristics and outcrossing rate. Evolution 36:352-360.
46. Snow, A. A., T. P. Spira, R. Simpson, and R. A. Klips. 1996. The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. Pp. 191-216 in D. G. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York.