Does shorter rehabilitation limit potential recovery poststroke?

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 88-94

  Fasoli, Susan E ^a,d   Krebs, Hermano I ^a,b   Ferraro, Mark ^c   Hogan, Neville ^a   Volpe, Bruce T ^b,c  

^a Massachusetts IOnstitute of Technol ^*  (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c BURKE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular accident; Robotic therapy; Upper extremity paresis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PARESIS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 3142734368     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0888439004267434     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2003 update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2003.
2. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 1992;23:1084-9.
3. Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1629-37.
4. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol 2001;14:745-52.
5. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:347-54.
6. Guide for the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation, version 5.1. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1997.
7. Carter GM, Relles DA, Ridgeway GK, Rimes CM. Measuring function for Medicare inpatient rehabilitation payment. Health Care Financ Rev 2003;24(3):25-44.
8. Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJH. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow up study. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:357-64.
9. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen T. Outcome and time course of recovery, part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:406-12.
10. Medicare program: changes to the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system and fiscal year 2004 rates, final rule. Fed Regist 2003 Aug 1;68-(148):45673-728.
11. Sveen U, Bautz-Holter E, Sodring KM, Wyller TB, Laake K. Association between impairments, self-care ability and social activities 1 year after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:372-7.
12. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels CM, Aisen ML. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000;54:1938-44.
13. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Aisen MD, Hogan N. Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37:639-52.
14. Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT. The effect of robot assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 1997;54:443-6.
15. Hogan N, Krebs HI, Sharon A, Charnnarong J, inventors; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Interactive robotic therapist. US patent 5,466,213. 1995.
16. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT. Robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998;6(1):75-87.
17. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13-31.
18. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 1983;63:1606-10.
19. Ferraro M, Hogan-Demaio J, Krol J, et al. Assessing the Motor Status Score: a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:283-9.
20. Medical Research Council/Guarantors of Brain. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. London: Bailliere Tindall; 1986.
21. Gregson JM, Leathley MJ, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK, Watkins CL. Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age Ageing 2000;29:223-8.
22. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
23. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels CM, Aisen ML. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology 1999;53:1874-6.
24. Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995;130:59-68.
25. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 2000;31:2984-8.
26. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:952-9.
27. Rodgers H, Mackintosh J, Price C, et al. Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome? Clin Rehabil 2003;17(6):579-89.
28. Miltner WL, Bauder H, Sommer M, Psych D, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke. Stroke 1999;30:586-92.
29. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000;31:2390-5.
30. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hogan N. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:477-82.
31. Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT. Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology 2003;61:1604-7.
32. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Forthcoming.
33. Smits JG. Recovery rate constants of recovery from stroke. J Neurovasc Dis 1997;2:211-9.