The effects of retinal abnormalities on the multifocal visual evoked potential

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 47, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 4378-4385

  Chen, John Y ^a,b   Hood, Donald C ^a   Odel, Jeffrey G ^b   Behrens, Myles M ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGOXIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE FUNDUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OPTIC NEURITIS; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA DISEASE; RETINA MACULA AGE RELATED DEGENERATION; RETINOL DEFICIENCY; RETINOPATHY; VISUAL FIELD; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RETINA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; REACTION TIME; RETINA; RETINAL DISEASES; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33750593978     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0242     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, et al. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field Electroencephal Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90:65-81.
2. Hood DC, Greenstein VC. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22:201-251.
3. Hood DC, Odel JG, Winn BJ. The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neuroophthalmol. 2003;23:279-289.
4. Holopigian K, Odel JG, Chen CS, Winn BJ. The multifocal electroretinogram. J Neuroophthalmol. 2003;23:225-235.
5. Holopigian K, Shuwairi SM, Greenstein VC, et al. Multifocal visual evoked potentials to cone specific stimuli in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Vis Res. 2005;45:3244-3252.
6. Granse L, Ponjavic V, Andreasson S. Full-field ERG, multifocal ERG and multifocal VEP in patients with retinitis pigmentosa and residual central visual fields. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82:701-706.
7. Hood DC. Assessing retinal function with the multifocal technique. Prog Ret Eye Res. 2000;19:607-646.
8. Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man: the photopic luminance response. Vis Res. 1992;32:433-446.
9. Hood DC, Holopigian K, Greenstein V, et al. Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multi-focal ERG technique. Vis Res. 1998;38:163-179.
10. Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, et al. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1580-1587.
11. Hood DC, Zhang X. Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol. 2000;100:115-137.
12. Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chen CS, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Hood DC. Multifocal visual evoked potential responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:34-40.
13. Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, et al. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:492-498.
14. Hood DC, Zhang X, Hong JE, Chen CS. Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol. 2002;104:303-320.
15. Sutter EE. Imaging visual function with the multifocal m-sequence technique. Vision Res. 2001;41:1241-1255.
16. Fortune B, Zhang X, Hood DC, Demirel S, Johnson CA. Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP. Doc Ophthalmol. 2004;109:87-100.
17. Zhang X, Hood DC Chen CS, Hong JE. A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol. 2004;104:287-302.
18. Hood DC, Zhang X, Winn BJ. Detecting glaucomatous damage with the mfVEP: how can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma. 2003;12:3-15.
19. Hood DC, Zhang X, Rodarte C, et al. Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol. 2004;109:177-187.
20. Hood DC, Ohri N, Yang EB, et al. Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis. Doc Ophthalmol. 2004;109:189-199.
21. Sherman J, Bass SJ, Noble KG, Nath S, Sutjia V. Visual evoked potential (VEP) delays in central serous choroidopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:214-221.
22. Bass SJ, Sherman J, Bodis-Wollner I, Nath S. Visual evoked potentials in macular disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:1071-1074.
23. Papakostopolus D, Hart CD, Cooper R, Natsikos V. Combined electrophysiological assessment of the visual system in central serous retinopathy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophys. 1984;59:77-80.
24. Folk JC, Thompson HS, Han DP, Brown CK. Visual function abnormalities in central serous retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:1299-1302.
25. Johnson LN, Yee RD, Hepler RS, Martin DA. Alternation of the visual evoked potential by macular holes: comparison with optic neuritis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1987;225:123-128.
26. Hofeldt, AJ Leavitt J, Behrens MM. Pulfrick stereo-illusion phenomenon in serous sensory retinal detachment of the macula. Am J Ophthalmol. 1985;100:576-580.