Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 177-187

  Hood, Donald C ^a   Zhang, Xian ^a   Rodarte, Christopher ^a   Yang, Bo E ^a   Ohri, Nitin ^a   Fortune, Brad ^b   Johnson, Chris A ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology; Latency; Multifocal visual evoked potential; VEP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE FUNDUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OPTIC NEURITIS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 16344390269     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-004-5511-1     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. HA Baseler EE Sutter SA Klein T Carney 1994 The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90 65-81 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90114-7 1:STN:280:ByuC2MrnsFY%3D 7509275
2. DC Hood JG Odel X Zhang 2000 Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 4032-8
3. DC Hood JG Odel BJ Winn 2003 The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neuroophthalmol 23 279-89
4. AI Klistorner SL Graham JR Grigg FA Billson 1998 Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: Improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39 937-50
5. SL Graham AI Klistorner JR Grigg FA Billson 2000 Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: Asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma 9 10-9
6. A Klistorner SL Graham 2000 Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107 2283-99
7. DC Hood X Zhang VC Greenstein S Kangovi JG Odel JM Liebmann R Ritch 2000 An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: A possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 1580-7
8. DC Hood X Zhang 2000 Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 100 115-37 10.1023/ A:1002727602212 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FptVWjsg%3D%3D
9. S Hasegawa H Abe 2001 Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 3341-8
10. I Goldberg SL Graham AI Klistorner 2002 Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 133 29-39
11. Fortune B, Goh K, Demirel S, Novitsky K, Mansberger SL, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA. Detection of glaucomatous visual field loss using the multifocal visual evoked potential. In: Henson DB, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update 2002/2003; Proceedings of the XVth international perimetric society meeting. The Hague: Kugler, 2003: 160-251.
12. DC Hood VC Greenstein 2003 Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 22 201-51 10.1016/S1350-9462(02)00061-7 12604058
13. P Thienprasiddhi VC Greenstein CS Chen JM Liebmann R Ritch DC Hood 2003 Multifocal visual evoked potential responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects. Am J Ophthalmol 136 34-40
14. DC Hood P Thienprasiddhi VC Greenstein BJ Winn N Ohri JM Liebmann R Ritch 2004 Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: A comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 492-8
15. AI Klistorner SL Graham 2001 Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: Effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 2145-52 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvjtlKntg%3D%3D 11481284
16. D Regan 1989 Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. Elsevier New York
17. Brigell MG. The visual evoked potential. In: Fishman GA, Birch DG, et al, eds. Electrophysiological testing in disorders of the retina, Optic Nerve, and Visual Pathway. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology 2001; 237-279.
18. DC Hood X Zhang JE Hong CS Chen 2002 Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol 104 303-20
19. Shimada Y, Horiguchi M, Nakamura A. Spatial and temporal properties of interocdular timing differences in multifocal visual evoked potential. Vis Res 2004; in press.
20. Fortune B, Zhang X, Hood DC, Demirel S, Johnson CA. Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP. Doc Ophthalmol. In press.
21. EE Sutter 2001 Imaging visual function with the multifocal m-sequence technique. Vision Res 41 1241-55
22. X Zhang DC Hood CS Chen JE Hong 2002 A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: An objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol 104 287-302 10.1023/A:1015220501743 12076017
23. DC Hood X Zhang BJ Winn 2003 Detecting glaucomatous damage with the mfVEP: How can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma 12 3-15
24. AL Klistorner SL Graham 1999 Multifocal pattern VEP perimetry: Analysis of sectoral waveforms. Doc Ophthalmol 98 183-196
25. BC Chauhan DB Henson AJ Hobley 1988 Cluster analysis in visual field quantification. Doc Ophthalmol 69 25-39
26. J Katz A Sommer DE Gaasterland DR Anderson 1991 Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 109 1684-9
27. S Mandava M Zulauf T Zeyen J Caprioli 1993 An evaluation of clusters in the glaucomatous visual field. Am J Ophthalmol 116 684-91
28. N-S Chu 1987 Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: Latency changes with gender and age. Cl Electroencephalog 18 159-62
29. BS Oken KH Chiappa E Gill 1987 Normal temporal variability of the P100 Electroencephalog Cl Neurophy 68 153-56
30. B Fortune DC Hood 2003 Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 1364-75
31. KW Mitchell JW Howe SR Spencer 1987 Visual evoked potentials in the older population: Age and gender effects. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 8 317-24