Facilitating interpersonal evaluation of knowledge in a context of distributed team collaboration

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 897-916

  Leinonen, Piritta ^a   Järvelä, Sanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

DISTRIBUTED TEAM COLLABORATION; GOAL-DIRECTED ACTIVITIES; PERSONAL ATTRIBUTIONS;

KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

EID: 33750436563     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00658.x     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 4, 199-209.
2. Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 403-436.
3. Billet, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: reconceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11, 6, 431-452.
4. Brennan, S. E. (1998). The grounding problem in conversations with and through computers. In S. R. Fussell & R. E. Kraut (Eds), Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication (pp. 201-225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: the role of student knowledge level and the case for meta-adaptation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 4, 487-497.
6. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 3, 271-315.
7. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A. & Jeong, H. (2004). Can tutors monitor students' understanding accurately? Cognition and Instruction, 22, 3, 363-387.
8. Clark, H. H. & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definete reference and mutual knowledge. In A. Joshi, B. Webber & I. Sag (Eds), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cotton, D. & Gresty, K. (2006). Reflecting on the think-aloud method for evaluating e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 17, 1, 45-54.
10. Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 3, 346-371.
11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 9, 526-536.
12. De Wever, B., Schellens, M., Valcke, H. & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: a review. Computers & Education, 46, 6-28.
13. Derry, S. J., DuRussel, L. A. & O'Donnell, A. (1998). Individual and distributed cognitions in interdisciplinary teamwork: a developing case study and emerging theory. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 25-57.
14. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL can we support CSCL (pp. 61-91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
15. Dillenbourg, P. & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 1, 121-151.
16. Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 3, 215-251.
17. Fiore, S. M. & Schooler, J. W. (2004). Process mapping and shared cognition: teamwork and the development of shared problem models. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds), Team cognition. Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 133-152). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Fischer, F. & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: the role of external representation tools. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 3, 405-441.
19. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C. & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 2, 213-232.
20. Goldman, S. R., Zech, L. K., Biswas, G., Noser, T. & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV) (1999). Computer technology and complex problem solving: issues in the study of complex cognitive activity. Instructional Science, 27, 235-268.
21. Hamilton, D. L. & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 2, 336-355.
22. Hardin, C. & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: how social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino (Ed.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: the interpersonal context (pp. 28-84). New York: Guilford.
23. Hewitt, J. (2005). Towards an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 4, 256-598.
24. Hewitt, J. & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 1, 75-96.
25. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K. & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 4, 379-432.
26. Jameson, J. & Squires, D. (2000). Teaching new media composition studies in a lifelong learning context. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 8, 3, 41-55.
27. Järvelä, S. & Häkkinen, P. (2002). Web-based cases in teaching and learning - the quality of discussions and a stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10, 1, 1-22.
28. Jermann, P. (2004). Computer support for interaction regulation in collaborative problem-solving (Doctoral thesis, University of Geneva, Thesis No. 340).
29. Jonassen, D. H. & Kwan, H. I. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 1, 35-52.
30. Kirschner, P. A., Strijbos, J. W., Kreijns, K. & Beers, P. J. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52, 3, 47-66.
31. Krauss, R. M. & Fussell, S. R. (1991). Constructing shared communicative environments. In L. B. Resnisck, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 172-200). Washingotn, DC: American Psychological Association.
32. Kraut, R. E. & Higgins, E. T. (1984). Communication and social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 87-128). Pub, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E. & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds), Distributed work (pp. 137-164). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
34. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A. & Jochems, W. (2003). Supporting social interaction for group dynamics through social affordances in CSCL: group awareness widgets. Paper presented at the 10th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Padova, Italy.
35. Kreijns, K., Kirchner, P. A., Jochems, W. & Van Buuren, H. (2004). Determining socialibity, social space, and social presence in (a)synchronous collaborative groups. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 2, 155-172.
36. Larkin, J. H. & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth of ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
37. Leinonen, P., Järvelä, S. & Häkkinen, P. (2005). Conceptualizing the awareness of collaboration: a qualitative study of a global virtual team. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14, 301-322.
38. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. London: Souvenir Press Ltd.
39. Nelson, T., Kruglanski, A. & Jost, J. (1998). Knowing thyself and others: progress in metacognitive social psychology. In V. Yzerbyt, G. Lories & B. Dardenne (Eds), Metacognition cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 69-89). London: Sage Publications.
40. Nisbett, R. E., Caputo, C., Legant, P. & Marecek, J. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 3, 154-164.
41. Nystrand, M. (1986). Structure of written communication studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
42. Ogata, H. & Yano, Y. (1998). Knowledge awareness: bridging learners in a collaborative learning environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4, 2/3, 219-236.
43. Ploetzner, R. & Rowe, R. (2004). Dynamic visualisations and learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 3, 235-240.
44. Richards, L. (1999). Using NVivo in qualitative research, London: Sage Publications.
45. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 3, 235-276.
47. Salas, E. & Fiore, S. M. (2004). Why team cognition? An overview. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds), Team cognition. Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 3-8). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48. Salomon, G. & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89-100.
49. Savenye, W. C. & Robinson, R. S. (1996). Qualitative research issues and methods: an introduction for educational technologist. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1171-1195). New York: Macmillan Library Reference.
50. Schwarz, D. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 3, 321-354.
51. Shirouzu, H., Miyake, N. & Masukawa, H. (2002). Cognitively active externalization for situated reflection. Cognitive Science, 26, 469-501.
52. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data methods for analysing talk, text and interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
53. Strijbos, J.-W, Martens, R. L., Prins, F. & Jochems, W. M. (2006). Content analysis: what are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46, 29-48.
54. Tynjälä, P. & Häkkinen, P. (2005). e-Learning at work: theoretical underpinnings and pedagogical challenges. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 17, 5/6, 318-336.
55. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K. & Fischer, F. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33, 1-30.
56. Weisband, S. & Atwater, L. (1999). Evaluating self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 4, 632-639.
57. Winters, F. I. & Azevedo, R. (2005). High-school students' regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33, 2, 189-217.