Cognitively active externalization for situated reflection

Cognitive Science

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 469-501

  Shirouzu, Hajime ^a   Miyake, Naomi ^a   Masukawa, Hiroyuki ^a  

^a CHUKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Externalization; Role exchange; Situated reflection

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038124240     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2604_3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989a). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
2. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989b). Debating situation: A rejoinder to Palinscar and Wineburg. Educational Researcher, 18, 10-12.
3. Chambers, D., & Reisberg, D. (1985). Can mental images be ambiguous? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 317-328.
4. de la Rocha, O. (1986). Problems of sense and problems of scale: An ethnographic study of arithmetic in everyday life. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
5. Greeno, J. G., Sommerfeld, M. C., & Wiebe, M. (2000). Practices of questioning and explaining in learning to model. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 669-674). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Hastie, R. (1986). Review essay: Experimental evidence on group accuracy. In B. Grofman & G. Owen (Eds.), Decision research, Vol. 1, Information pooling and group decision making: Proceedings of the second conference on political economy (pp. 129-157). University of California, Irvine.
7. Holbrook, J., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Scaffolding the development of an inquiry-based (Science) classroom. In B. Fishman & S. F. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), International conference of the learning sciences (pp. 221-227). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Kirsh, D. (1995). The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 415-452.
10. Kirsh, D. (1996). Adapting the environment instead of oneself. Adaptive Behavior, 4, 415-452.
11. Kirsh, D.,&Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513-549.
12. Larkin, J., & Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
13. Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67-94). Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Press.
14. Lorge, I., & Solomon, H. (1955). Two models of group behavior in the solution of eureka-type problems. Psychometrica, 20, 139-148.
15. Miyake, N. (1986). Constructive interaction and the iterative process of understanding. Cognitive Science, 10, 151-177.
16. Miyake N. in collaboration with the P.I.A. Group (1994). Personal knowledge: Its externalization, manipulation and sharing for scientific creative activities. In Proceedings of the international symposium on intellectual facilitation of creative activities (pp. 14-19). Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology.
17. Miyake, N. (1996). Conditions for constructive interaction. Cognitive studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 3, 26-27.
18. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge University Press.
19. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
20. Okada, T., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Collaborative discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 21, 109-146.
21. Palinscar, A. S. (1989). Less charted waters. Educational Researcher, 18, 5-7.
22. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
23. Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47-87). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24. Reisberg, D. (1987). External representations and the advantages of externalizing one's thoughts. In Proceedings of the 9th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 281-293).
25. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235-276.
26. Salomon, G. (1990). If intelligence is distributed: What about the cultivation of individuals' abilities? Paper presented at a symposium in American Educational Research Association. Boston.
27. Schwartz, D. L. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 321-354.
28. Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457-497.
29. Shirouzu, H. (2001). Children's algorithmic sense-making through verbalization. Paper presented at the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society. Edinburgh, UK.
30. Shirouzu, H.,&Miyake, N. (1999a). Cognitively active use of external resources: Further analyses of the interactive problem solving processes. Tech. Rep. No. 98-1-03. Nagoya: School of Computer and Cognitive Sciences, Chukyo University.
31. Shirouzu, H. & Miyake, N. (1999b). Roles of cognitive externalization for joint problem solving. In Proceedings of the second international conference on cognitive science and the 16th annual meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society Joint Conference (pp. 337-342).
32. Shirouzu, H., & Miyake, N. (2002). Guided verbalization for conceptual understanding: A scaffold for making sense of multiple traces of cognition. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
33. Stenning, K., & Sommerfeld, M. (2000). Heterogeneous reasoning in learning to model. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 493-498). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Suwa, M., Gero, J.,&Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies, 21, 539-567.
35. Wineburg, S. S. (1989). Remembrance of theories past. Educational Researcher, 18, 7-10.
36. Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21, 179-217.
37. Zhang, J., & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87-122.