Who is at risk and why? Teachers' reasons for concern and their understanding and assessment of early literacy

Educational Assessment

Volumn 11, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 149-178

  Bailey, Alison L ^a   Drummond, Kathryn V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750180165     PISSN: 10627197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326977ea1103&4_2     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Artiles, A. J., & Trent, S. (1994). Over-representation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. Journal of Special Education, 27, 410-437.
2. Bailey, A. L., Cano, L., Fischer, D., Freeman, S., Jacobs, J., Heritage, M., et al. (2001). The LDC manual: A guide to using the Literacy Development Checklist (Rev. ed.). Los Angeles: University of California Regents.
3. Baker, E., Linn, R. L., Herman, J., & Koretz, D. (2002). Standards for educational accountability systems (Policy Brief No. 5). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
4. Borko, H., Davinroy, K. H., Bliem, C. L., & Cumbo, K. B. (2000). Exploring and supporting teacher change: Two third-grade teachers' experiences in a mathematics and literacy staff development project. Elementary School Journal, 100, 273-306.
5. Brady, S., & Moats, L. (1997). Informed instruction for reading success: Foundations for teacher preparation. Baltimore, MD: International Dyslexia Association. Retrieved October 31, 2003, from http://www.interdys.org/ bs/web-cart_default1.asp
6. Brophy, J. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 631-661.
7. Buly, M. R., & Valencia, S (2003). Meeting the needs of failing readers: Cautions and considerations for state policy. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
8. Bus, A. G., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403-414.
9. Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709-725). New York: Simon & Schuster.
10. California Reading and Literature Project. (2001). Kindergarten-sixth grade reading RESULTS assessment manual, 2001-2002. La Jolla,CA: Author.
11. Christensen, C. A., & Elkins, J. (1995, April). Learning disabilities or difficulties: The impact of teachers'conceptions on identification, assessment, and instruction of students with reading problems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Scientific Study of Reading, San Francisco, CA.
12. Clay, M. (1979). Stones: The Concepts About Print Test. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
13. Clay, M. (2000). Concepts About Print: What have children learned about the way we print language? Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann.
14. Cox, B. E., Fang, Z., Carriveau, R., Dillon, D., Hopkins, C., & Nierstheimer, S. (1998). Preservice teachers' construction of professional knowledge: Teacher learning about literacy education. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 47, 508-516.
15. Duffy, G. G. (2002). Visioning and the development of outstanding teachers. Reading Research and Instruction, 41, 331-344
16. Duncan, S., & De Avila, E. (1986). Pre-Language Assessment Scales. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw Hill.
17. Durán, R. (1989). Testing of linguistic minorities. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 573-587). New York: American Council on Education/MacMillan.
18. Flynn, J. M., & Rahbar, M. H. (1998). Improving teacher predication of children at risk for reading failure. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 163-172.
19. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers' generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653-689.
20. Gallimore, R., & Goldenberg, C. (1993). Activity settings of early literacy: Home and school factors in children's emergent literacy. In E. Forrnan, N. Minick, & C.A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 315-335). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21. Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. (2002, March). Closing the teaching gap: Assisting teachers to adapt to changing standards and assessments. Seminar of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, London.
22. Gardner, M. F. (1990). Expressive One- Word Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Novato, C A: Academic Therapy.
23. Good, R., & Kaminski, R. (2000). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) (6th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
24. Good, T. L. (1987). Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 32-47.
25. Gottlieb, J., & Weinberg, S. (1999). Comparison of students referred and not referred to special education. Elementary School Journal, 99, 187-199
26. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like, and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.
27. Hill, B. R., Baldo, A. J., & D'Amato, R. C. (1999). Teachers' perspectives and student behavior in referrals for special education. Psychological Reports, 84, 491-493.
28. IDEA Proficiency Test. (2004). Brea, CA: Ballard and Tighe.
29. Invemizzi, M. (2001). Phonological Awareness Literacy screening 1-3 (2nd ed.). Charlottesville, VA: University Printing Services.
30. Invenizzi, M., Swank, L., & Juel, C. (2001). Phonological awareness literacy screening, kindergarten (2nd ed.). Charlottesville, VA: University Printing Services.
31. Jimerson, S., Carlson, E., Rotert, M., Egeland, B., & Sroufe, L.A. (1997). A prospective, longitudinal study of the correlates and consequences of early grade retention. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 3-25.
32. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
33. Kastner, J., & Gottlieb, J. (1991). Classification of children in special education: Importance of pre-assessment information. Psychology in the Schools, 28, 19-27.
34. Klein, A. F., Kelly, P. R., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Teaching from theory: Decision making in reading recovery. In S. A. Stahl & D. A. Hayes (Eds.), Instructional models in reading (pp. 161-180). Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
35. Lonigan, C. J., Bloomfield, B. G., Anthony, J. L., Bacon, K. D., Phillips, B. M., & Samwel, C. S. (1999). Relations among emergent literacy skills, behavior problems, and social competence in preschool children from low- and middle-income backgrounds. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19, 40-53.
36. Mehan, H. (1983). The role of language and the language of role in institutional decision making. Language in Society, 12, 187-211.
37. Mergendoller, J. R., & Sacks, C. H. (1994). Concerning the relationship between teachers' theoretical orientations toward reading and their concept maps. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 589-199.
38. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39. Moats, L. C. (2001, October). A blueprint for professional development for teachers of reading and writing: Knowledge, skills, and learning activities. Presentation to the Symposium on the National Reading Panel Report and Teacher Preparation, Los Angeles, CA.
40. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1990). Learning to read in our nation's schools: Instruction and achievement in 1988 at grades 4, 8, and 12 (Report No. 19-R-02). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
41. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Retrieved March 27, 2006, from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.htm
42. No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Title 1: Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged. 107th Congress, 1st Session, December 13, 2001.
43. Pressley, M., Rankin J., & Yokoi, L. (1996). A survey of instructional practices of primary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Elementary School Journal, 96, 363-384.
44. Purcell-Gates, V. (1997). Focus on research: The future of research in language arts. Language Arts, 74, 280-283.
45. Richardson, E., & DiBenedetto, B. (1996). Identifying dyslexic students. In L. R. Putnam (Ed.), How to become a better reading teacher: Strategies for assessment and intervention (pp. 53-63). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
46. Salinger, T. (2001). Assessing the literacy of young children: The case for multiple forms of evidence. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 390-418). New York: Guilford Press.
47. Senechal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children's reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445-460.
48. Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (1993). Learning disabilities and attention deficits in the school setting. In L. J. Meltzer (Ed.), Strategy assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities: From theory to practice (pp. 221-245). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
49. Shepard, L. (2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning (Center for the Study of Evaluation Tech. Rep. No. 517). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research, Evaluation, and Student Testing.
50. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 51, 1-22.
51. Smith, F. (2003). Unspeakable acts, unnatural practices: Flaws and fallacies in "scientific" reading instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
52. Snow, C. E., Bums, S. M., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
53. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
54. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. Elementary School Journal, 101, 121-165.
55. Teale, W. H. (1990). The promise and challenge of informal assessment in early literacy. In L. Morrow & J. Smith (Eds.), Assessment for instruction in early literacy (pp. 45-61). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
56. Teale, W. H., & Sulzby, E. (1986). Introduction: Emergent literacy as a perspective for examining how young children become writers and readers. In W. H. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Writing and reading (pp. vii-xxv). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
57. Texas Primary Reading Inventory. (2003). Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.
58. Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (2001). Emergent literacy skills, early instruction, and individual differences as determinants of difficulties in learning to read: The case for early intervention. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 295-321). New York: Guilford Press.
59. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1997). CTOPP: The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
60. Wolf, M., & Gow, D. (1986). A longitudinal investigation of gender differences in language and reading development. First Language, 6, 81-110.
61. Wong Fillmore, L., & Snow, C. (2000). What teachers need to know about language. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. Retrieved 24 April 2006 from http://www.cal.org/ericcll/teachers
62. Woodcock, R.W. (1997). Woodcock Diagnostic Reading Battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside.