On the efficacy of intervention methods for children and adolescents with learning problems: A synopsis of available meta-analyses;Zur Effektivität von Fördermethoden bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Lernstörungen: Eine Synopse vorliegender Metaanalysen

Kindheit und Entwicklung

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 239-254

  Grünke, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evidence based special education; Learning disorders; Learning promotion; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749659471     PISSN: 09425403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0942-5403.15.4.239     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Arter, J. A. & Jenkins, J. R. (1977). Examining the benefits and prevalence of modality considerations in special education. Journal of Special Education, 11, 281-298.
2. Aukermann, R. (1984). Approaches to beginning reading. New York: Wiley.
3. Baer, R. A. & Nietzel, M. T. (1991). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of impulsivity in children: A meta-analytic review of the outcome literature. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 400-412.
4. Baker, S., Gersten, R. & Lee, D. S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 51-73.
5. Barbe, W. B. & Swassing, R. H. (1979). Teaching through modality strength concepts and practices. Columbus, OH: Zaner Bloser.
6. Baxter, J., Woodward, J & Olson, D. (2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction in five third grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 101, 529-548.
7. Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, 1, 100-112.
8. Brückl, H. (1948). Der Gesamtunterricht im ersten Schuljahr mit organischem Einbau des ersten Lesens und Schreibens nach der Ganzwortmethode. Kemmern: Leibniz.
9. Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame'enui, E. & Tarver, S. G. (2004). Direct instruction reading. Columbus, OH: Pearson.
10. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S. & Tyler, B. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis of the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
12. Cook, S. B., Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A. & Casto, G. C. (1986). Handicapped students as tutors. Journal of Special Education, 19, 483-492.
13. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahls, S. A. & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
14. Elbaum, B. (2002). The self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of comparisons across different placements. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17, 216-226.
15. Elbaum, B. & Vaughn, S. (2001). School-based interventions to enhance the self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal, 101, 303-329.
16. Elbaum, B. & Vaughn, S. (2003). For which students with learning disabilities are self-concept interventions effective? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 101-108.
17. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. & Moody, S. W (1999). Grouping practices and reading outcomes for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 65, 399-415.
18. Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M. T., Moody, S. W. & Schumm, J. S. (2000). A meta-analytic review of the effect of instructional grouping format on the reading outcomes of students with disabilities. In R. Gersten, E. Schiller, J. S. Schumm & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Issues and research in special education (pp. 105-135). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
19. Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Lyle Stuart.
20. Forness, S. R. & Kavale, K. A. (1996). Treating social skill deficits in children with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of the research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19, 2-13.
21. Forness, S. R., Kavale, K. A., Blum, I. M. & Lloyd, J. W. (1997). What works in special education and related services: Using meta-analysis to guide practice. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29, 4-9.
22. Frostig, M. (1999). Bewegungserziehung. München: Reinhardt.
23. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., Lipsey, M. W. & Roberts, P. H. (2002). Is "learning disabilities" just a fancy term for low achievement? A meta-analysis of reading differences between low achievers with and without the label. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 737-762). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Gallinat, H.-J. & Rix, A. (2004). Psychomotorik: freizeitpädagogischer Spaß oder lernzielorientierte Förderung? Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik, 55, 440-450.
25. Gersten, R. & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 251-272.
26. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 5, 3-8.
27. Glasser, W. (1967) Reality therapy: A new approach to psychiatry. New York: Harper & Collins.
28. Gresham, F. M., MacMillan, D. L. & Bacian, K. M. (1996). Learning disabilities, low achievement, and mild mental retardation: More alike than different? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 570-581.
29. Grünke, M. (2000). Rational-emotive Erziehung bei Schülern mit Lernbehinderung. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 47, 296-306.
30. Haag, L. (2004). Tutorielles Lernen. In G. W. Lauth, M. Grünke & J.C. Brunstein (Hrsg.), Interventionen bei Lernstörungen: Förderung, Training und Therapie in der Praxis (S. 402-410). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
31. Harris, T. L. & Hodges, R. E. (1995). The Literacy Dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
32. Jitendra, A. K., Edwards, L. L., Sacks, G. & Jacobson, L. A. (2004). What research says about vocabulary instruction for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70, 299-322.
33. Karch, D., Schellenschmitt, M. & Feike, R. (1989). Psychomotorische Therapie. In D. Karch, R. Michaelis, A. Rennen & H. G. Schlack (Hrsg.), Normale und gestörte Entwicklung: Kritische Aspekte zu Diagnostik und Therapie (S. 91-103). Berlin: Springer.
34. Kaslow, F. W. (1974). Movement, music and art therapy techniques adapted for special education. In R. Hyatt & N. Rolnick (Eds.), Teaching the mentally handicapped child (pp.337-350). Pasadena, CA: Behavioral Publications.
35. Kavale, K. A. (1984). A meta-analytic evaluation of the Frostig test and training program. Exceptional Children, 31, 134-141.
36. Kavale, K. A. & Forness, S. R. (1987). Substance over style: Assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children, 54, 228-239.
37. Kavale, K. A. & Mattson, P. D. (1983). "One jumped off the balance beam": Meta-analysis of perceptual motor training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 165-173.
38. Kavale, K. A. & Mostert, M. P. (2004). Social skills interventions for individuals with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 31-43.
39. Kesper, G. & Hottinger, C. (2002). Mototherapie bei sensorischen Integrationsstörungen. München: Reinhardt.
40. Klauer, K. J. (2000). Forschungsperspektiven der Sonderpädagogischen Psychologie. In J. Borchert (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Sonderpädagogischen Psychologie (S. 993-999). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
41. Klauer, K. J. (2001). Training des induktiven Denkens. In K. J. Klauer (Hrsg.), Handbuch Kognitives Training (2. erw. Aufl., S. 165-209). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
42. Kroesbergen, E. H. & Luit, J. E. H. van (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97-114.
43. Kullik, U. (2004a). Computergestützte Rechtschreibtrainings-programme. In G. W. Lauth, M. Grünke & J. C. Brunstein (Hrsg.), Interventionen bei Lernstörungen: Förderung, Training und Therapie in der Praxis (S. 320-328). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
44. Kullik, U. (2004b). Computergestützte Rechentrainingsprogramme. In G. W. Lauth, M. Grünke & J. C. Brunstein (Hrsg.), Interventionen bei Lernstörungen: Förderung, Training und Therapie in der Praxis (S. 329-337). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
45. Lauth, G. W. (2004). Selbstinstruktionstraining. In G. W. Lauth, M. Grünke & J. C. Brunstein (Hrsg.), Interventionen bei Lernstörungen: Förderung, Training und Therapie in der Praxis (S. 360-370). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
46. Lauth, G. W. & Grünke, M. (2005). Interventionen bei Lernstörungen. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde, 153, 640-648.
47. Lloyd, J. W., Forness, S. R. & Kavale, K. A. (1998). Some methods are more effective than others. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33, 195-200.
48. Mackowiack, K. (2004). Vermittlung von Lernstrategien. In G. W. Lauth, M. Grünke & J. C. Brunstein (Hrsg.), Interventionen bei Lernstörungen: Förderung, Training und Therapie in der Praxis (S. 145-158). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
49. Masendorf, F. (1988). Die Trainierbarkeit des abstrakten Denkens bei lernbehinderten Kindern. Heilpädagogische Forschung, 14, 10-20.
50. Masendorf, F. & Grünke, M. (2000). Metaanalysen. In J. Borchert (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Sonderpädagogischen Psychologie (S. 986-991). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
51. Naumann, K. & Bellingrath, J. (2004). Eltern und Lehrer als Mediatoren. In G. W. Lauth, M. Grünke & J. C. Brunstein (Hrsg.), Interventionen bei Lernstörungen: Förderung, Training und Therapie in der Praxis (S. 145-158). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
52. O'Connor, R. E., Jenkins, J. R., Leicester, N. & Slocum, T. A. (1993). Teaching phonological awareness to young children with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 532-546.
53. O'Connor, R. E., Jenkins, J. R. & Slocum, T. A. (1995). Transfer among phonological tasks in kindergarten: Essential instructional content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 202-217.
54. Olson, J. L. & Platt, J. M. (2000). Teaching children and adolescents with special needs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
55. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International. Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
56. Plath, I. (2001). Metaanalyse. In D. Rost (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (2. erw. Aufl., S. 461-465). Weinheim: Beltz.
57. Purdie, N. & Ellis, L. (2005). A review of the empirical evidence identifying effective interventions and teaching practices for students with learning difficulties in years 4, 5 and 6. Camberwell, AUS: Australian Council for Educational Research.
58. Runow, V. & Borchert, J. (2003). Effektive Interventionen im sonderpädagogischen Arbeitsfeld - ein Vergleich zwischen Forschungsbefunden und Lehrereinschätzungen. Heilpädagogische Forschung. 29, 189-203.
59. Schmidt, M., Weinstein, T., Niemic, R. & Walberg, H. J. (1986). Computer-assisted instruction with exceptional children. Journal of Special Education, 19, 493-501.
60. Swanson, H. L. (1999a). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 14, 129-140.
61. Swanson, H. L. (1999b). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504-534.
62. Swanson, H. L. (2001a). Research interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of outcomes related to higher-order processing. Elementary School Journal, 101, 331-348.
63. Swanson, H. L. (2001b). Searching for the best model for instructing students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34, 1-15.
64. Swanson, H. L. & Deshler, D. (2003). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: Converting a meta-analysis to practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 124-134.
65. Swanson, H. L. & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational-Research, 68, 277-321.
66. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M. & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.
67. Swanson, H. L. & Sachse-Lee, C. (2000). A meta-analysis of single-subject-design intervention research for students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 114-136.
68. Talbott, E., Lloyd, J. W. & Tankersley, M. (1994). Effects of reading comprehension interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 223-232.
69. Vermette, P. & Foote, C. (2001). Constructivist philosophy and cooperative learning practice: Toward integration and reconciliation in secondary classrooms. American Secondary Education, 30, 26-37.
70. Walter, J. (2002). "Einer flog übers Kuckucksnest" oder welche Interventionsformen erbringen im sonderpädagogischen Feld welche Effekte? Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik, 53, 442-450.
71. Walter, J. (2004). Anspruch und Wirklichkeit. Replik auf einige Aussagen und Einschätzungen in dem Artikel von Gallinat und Rix "Psychomotorik - freizeitpädagogischer Spaß oder lernzielorientierte Förderung?" Zeitschrift für Heilpädagogik, 55, 451-452.
72. White, W. A. (1988). A meta-analysis of the effects of direct instruction in special education. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 364-374.
73. Xin, Y. P. & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education, 32, 207-225.