Antecedents of team reward attitude

Group Dynamics

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 194-205

  Haines III, Victor Y ^a   Taggar, Simon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Compensation; Rewards; Teams

Indexed keywords

ANTECEDENT VARIABLE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COMPENSATION; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; MODEL; ORGANIZATION; REWARD; SELF CONCEPT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEAM REWARD ATTITUTE; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 33749623860     PISSN: 10892699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.194     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavioral and Human Processes, 50, 179-211.
2. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., & Heilbroner, R. L. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thoughts and actions: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
6. Baron, R. A. (1983). "Sweet smell of success"? The impact of pleasant artificial scents on evaluations on job applicants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 709-713.
7. Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317-348.
8. Chatman, J. A., & Barsade, S. G. (1995). Personality, organizational culture, and cooperation: Evidence from a business simulation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 423-443.
9. Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimental design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
10. Cooper, C. L., Dyck, B., & Frohlich, N. (1992). Improving the effectiveness of gainsharing: The role of fairness and participation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 471-490.
11. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
12. Cummings, T. G. (1978). Self-regulating work groups: A socio-technical analysis. Academy of Management Review, 3, 625-634.
13. DeMatteo, J. S., & Eby, L. T. (1997, August). Who likes team rewards? An examination of individual difference variables related to satisfaction with team-based rewards. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Boston.
14. DeMatteo, J. S., Eby, L. T., & Sundstrom, E. (1998). Team-based rewards: Current empirical evidence and directions for future research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 141-183.
15. DeMatteo, J. S., Rush, M. C., Sundstrom, E., & Eby, L. T. (1997). Factors related to the successful implementation of team-based rewards. American Compensation Association Journal, 6, 126-145.
16. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-152.
17. Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1991). Psychological individualism and romantic love. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229.
18. Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D., & Stark, E. M. (1999, August). Preference for team-based rewards: Construct development and initial validation. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Chicago.
19. Durham, C. C., Knight, D., & Locke, E. A. (1997). Effects of leader role, team-set goal difficulty, efficacy, and tactics on team effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 203-231.
20. Earley, P. C. (1994). Self or group? Cultural effects of training on self-efficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 89-117.
21. Eby, L. T., & Dobbins, G. H. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275-295.
22. Eden, D., & Kinnar, J. (1991). Modeling Galatea: Boosting self-efficacy to increase volunteering. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 770-780.
23. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817-835.
24. Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
25. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
26. Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 115-134.
27. Gavin, M. B., & Hofman, D. A. (2002). Using hierachical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 15-33.
28. Ghorpade, J., Chen, M. M., & Caggiano, J. (1995). Creating quality driven performance appraisal systems. Academy of Management Executive, 9, 32-39.
29. Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
30. Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
31. Hoyle, R. H., & Smith, G. T. (1994) Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural models: A conceptual overview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 429-440.
32. Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36(2), 109-133.
33. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Jawahar, I. M., & Elango, B. (1998). Predictors of performance in software training: Attitudes toward computers versus attitudes toward working with computers. Psychological Reports, 83, 227-233.
35. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
36. Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2000). Understanding why team members won't share: An examination of factors related to employee receptivity to team-based rewards. Small Group Research, 31, 175-209.
37. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
38. Konovsky, M. A., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1993, August). Effects of individual and group incentive systems and task interdependence on group productivity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.
39. Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D., & Sapienza, H. (1995). Building commitment attachment and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60-84.
40. Larson, C., & LaFasto, F. (1989). Teamwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Peer responses to low performers: An attributional model of helping in the context of groups. Academy of Management Review, 26, 67-84.
42. Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 352-368.
43. Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1984). The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 793-804.
44. Magner, N., Welker, R., & Johnson, G. (1996). The interactive effects of participation and outcome favorability on turnover intentions and evaluations of supervisors. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 69, 135-143.
45. McClurg, L. N. (2001). Team rewards: How far have we come? Human Resource Management, 40, 73-86.
46. Milkovich, G., & Wigdor, A. (1991). Pay for performance: Evaluating performance appraisal and merit pay. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47. Miller, L., & Hamblin, R. L. (1963). Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. American Sociological Review, 28, 768-778.
48. Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 127-143.
49. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S., Moorman, R., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142.
50. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
51. Prussia, G. E., Kinicki, A. J., & Bracker, J. S. (1993). Psychological and behavioral consequences of job loss: A covariance structural analysis using Weiner's (1985) attribution model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 382-395.
52. Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120-152.
53. Scott, S. G., & Einstein, W. O. (2001). Strategic performance appraisal in team-based organizations: One size does not fit all. Academy of Management Executive, 15, 107-116.
54. Shamir, B. (1990). Calculations, values and identities: The sources of collectivistic work motivation. Human Relations, 43, 313-332.
55. Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Stark, E. M. (2001). Team reward attitude: Construct development and initial validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 903-917.
56. Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 67-81.
57. Shepperd, L. A., & Taylor, K. M. (1999). Social loafing and expectancy-value theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(9), 1147-1158.
58. Susman, G. (1976). Autonomy at work: A sociotechnical analysis of participative management. New York: Praeger.
59. Taggar, S., & Neubert, M. (2004). The impact of poor performers on team outcomes: An empirical examination of attribution theory. Personnel Psychology, 57, 935-968.
60. Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. (2003). Leader and staff role-efficacy as antecedents of collective efficacy and team performance. Human Performance, 16, 131-156.
61. Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J. M., & van de Vliert, E. (1998). Motivating effects of task and outcome interdependence in work teams. Group and Organization Management, 23, 124-143.
62. Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J. M., & van de Vliert, E. (2001). Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 54, 51-69.
63. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
64. Wageman, R., & Baker, G. (1997). Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 139-158.
65. Wagner, J. A. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152-172.
66. Wagner, J. A., & Moch, M. K. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: Concept and measure. Group and Organization Studies, 11, 280-303.
67. Weimann, J. (1994). Individual behavior in a free riding experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 185-200.
68. Weinberger, T. E. (1998). A method for determining the equitable allocation of team-based pay: Rewarding members of a cross-functional account team. Compensation and Benefits Management, 14, 18-26.
69. Yamagashi, T. (1988). Exit from group as an individualistic solution to the free rider problem in the United States and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 530-542.