How negotiator self-efficacy drives decisions to pursue mediation

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 2649-2669

  Arnold, Josh A ^a,c   O'Connor, Kathleen M ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749559464     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00121.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allred, K. G., Mallozzi, J. S., Matsui, F., & Raia, C. P. (1997). The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 175-187.
2. Arnold, J. A. (2000). Insightful mediators: Disputants' perceptions of third parties' knowledge and its effect on mediated negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 319-337.
3. Arnold, J. A., & Carnevale, P. J. (1997). Preferences for dispute-resolution procedures as a function of intentionality, consequences, expected future interaction, and power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 371-398.
4. Arnold, J. A., & O'Connor, K. M. (1999). Ombudspersons or peers? The effects of third-party expertise and recommendations on negotiation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 776-785.
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
8. Bercovitch, J. (1991). International mediation and dispute settlement: Evaluating the conditions for successful mediation. Negotiation Journal, 7, 17-30.
9. Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1995). Beyond distrust: ''Getting even'' and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 246-260). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Bies, R. J., Tripp, T. M., & Kramer, R. M. (1997). At the breaking point: Cognitive and social dynamics of revenge in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 18-36). London, UK: Sage.
11. Bingham, L. B., & Pitts, D. W. (2002). Highlights of mediation at work: Studies of the National REDRESS evaluation project. Negotiation Journal, 18, 135-146.
12. Brett, J. F., Pinkley, R. L., & Jackofsky, E. F. (1996). Alternatives to having a BATNA in dyadic negotiation: The influence of goals, self-efficacy, and alternatives on negotiated outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 121-138.
13. Brett, J. M., Barsness, Z. I., & Goldberg, S. B. (1996). The effectiveness of mediation: An independent analysis of cases handled by four major service providers. Negotiation Journal, 12, 259-269.
14. Carnevale, P. J., & Pruitt, D. G. (1992). Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 531-582.
15. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domains at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234-246.
16. Conlon, D. E., Moon, H., & Ng, K. Y. (2002). Putting the cart before the horse: The benefits of arbitrating before mediating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 978-984.
17. Conlon, D. E., & Ross, W. H. (1993). The effects of partisan third parties on negotiation behavior and outcome perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 280-290.
18. French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-168). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
19. Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183-211.
20. Gist, M. E., Stevens, C. K., & Bavetta, A. G. (1991). Effects of self-efficacy and post-training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills. Personnel Psychology, 44, 837-861.
21. Herrman, M. S., Hollett, N., Gale, J., & Foster, M. (2001). Defining mediator knowledge and skills. Negotiation Journal, 17, 139-153.
22. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349-361.
24. Karambayya, R., Brett, J. M., & Lytle, A. (1992). The effects of formal authority and experience on third-party roles, outcomes, and perception of fairness. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 426-438.
25. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422-431.
26. Kolb, D. M. (1985). To be a mediator: Expressive tactics in mediation. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 11-26.
27. Kressel, K. (1972). Labor mediation: An exploratory survey. Albany, NY: Association of Labor Mediation Agencies.
28. Kressel, K., & Pruitt, D. G. (1989). Mediation research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29. Leung, K., & Lind, E. A. (1986). Procedure and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134-1140.
30. Lipsky, D. B., & Seeber, R. L. (2000). Resolving workplace disputes in the United States: The growth of alternative dispute resolution in employment relations. Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Employment, 2(3), 37-49.
31. Mareschal, P. M. (2002). Mastering the art of dispute resolution: Best practices from the FMCS. International Journal of Public Administration, 25, 1351-1377.
32. Meltzer, D. L. (1998). The Federal workplace ombuds. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 13, 549-609.
33. Nease, A. A., Mudgett, B. O., & Quiñones, M. A. (1999). Relationships among feedback sign, self-efficacy, and acceptance of performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 806-814.
34. O'Connor, K. M. (1997). Groups and solos in context: The effects of accountability on team negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 384-407.
35. O'Connor, K. M., & Arnold, J. A. (2001). Distributive spirals: Negotiation impasses and the moderating role of self-efficacy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 148-176.
36. O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Peirce, R. S., Pruitt, D. G., & Czaja, S. J. (1993). Complainant-responded differences in procedural choice. International Journal of Conflict Management, 4, 199-222.
38. Pinkley, R. L. (1995). Impact of knowledge regarding alternatives to settlement in dyadic negotiations: Whose knowledge counts? Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 403-417.
39. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
40. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
41. Ross, W. H., & Conlon, D. (2000). Hybrid forms of third-party dispute resolution: Theoretical implications of combining mediation and arbitration. Academy of Management Review, 25, 416-427.
42. Ross, W. H., Conlon, D. E., & Lind, E. A. (1990). The mediator as leader: Effects of behavioral style and deadline certainty on negotiator behavior. Group and Organizational Studies, 25, 105-124.
43. Rowe, M. P. (1995). Options, functions, and skills: What an organizational ombudsperson might want to know. Negotiation Journal, 11, 103-114.
44. Silver, W. S., Mitchell, T. R., & Gist, M. E. (1995). Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 286-299.
45. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
46. Stevens, C. K., Bavetta, A. G., & Gist, M. E. (1993). Gender differences in the acquisition of salary negotiation skills: The role of goals, self-efficacy, and perceived control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 723-735.
47. Stevens, C. K., & Gist, M. E. (1997). Effects of self-efficacy and goal orientation training on negotiation skill maintenance: What are the mechanisms? Personnel Psychology, 50, 955-978.
48. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148.
49. Tome, V. (1992). Maintaining credibility as a partial mediator: United States mediation in Southern Africa, 1981-1988. Negotiation Journal, 8, 273-289.
50. Touval, S., & Zartman, I. W. (1989). International mediation: Conflict resolution and power politics. In K. Kressel & D. G. Pruitt (Eds.), Mediation research (pp. 115-137). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
51. Wagner, M. L. (2000). The organizational ombudsman as change agent. Negotiation Journal, 16, 99-114.
52. Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill.
53. Welton, G. L., & Pruitt, D. G. (1987). The effects of mediator bias and disputant power over the mediator on the mediation process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 123-133.
54. Whyte, G., Sacks, A. M., & Hooke, S. (1997). When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 415-432.
55. Wittmer, J. M., Carnevale, P. J., & Walker, M. E. (1991). General alignment and overt support in biased mediation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 594-610.