Groups and Solos in Context: The Effects of Accountability on Team Negotiation

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 384-407

  O'Connor, Kathleen M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000438373     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2743     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly. 37:1992;634-665.
2. Ancona D. G., Friedman R. A., Kolb D. M. The group and what happens on the way to "yes" Negotiation Journal. 7:1991;155-173.
3. Ben-Yoav O., Pruitt D. G. Accountability to constituents: A two-edged sword. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 34:1984;283-295.
4. Benton A. A., Druckman D. Salient solutions and the bargaining behavior of representatives and nonrepresentatives. International Journal of Group Tension. 3:1973;28-29.
5. Benton A. A., Druckman D. Constituent's bargaining orientation and intergroup negotiations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 4:1974;141-150.
6. Bodenhausen G. V., Kramer G. P., Susser K. Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 66:1994;621-632.
7. Bouas K. S., Komorita S. S. Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin. 22:1996;1144-1150.
8. Burnstein E., Vinokur A. Testing two classes of theories about group induced shifts in individual choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 13:1973;315-332.
9. Carnevale P. J. Accountability of group representatives and intergroup relations. Advances in group processes. 2:1985;Greenwich CT: JAI Press. p. 227-248.
10. Carnevale P. J., Pruitt D. G. Negotiation and mediation. Annual Review of Psychology. 43:1992;531-582.
11. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39:1980;752-766.
12. Clyman D. R. Measures of joint performance in dyadic mixed-motive negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 64:1995;38-48.
13. Darley J. M., Latane B. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 8:1968;377-383.
14. Davis J. H. Group performance. 1969;Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Davis J. H. Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review. 80:1973;97-125.
16. Diehl M., Stroebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 53:1987;497-509.
17. Druckman D. Determinants of compromising behavior in negotiation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 38:1994;507-556.
18. Friedman R. A., Gal S. Managing around roles: Building groups in labor negotiations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 27:1991;356-378.
19. Goodman P. S. Designing effective work groups. 1986;San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Goodman P. S., Ravlin E, Schminke M. Understanding groups in organizations. InResearch in organizational behavioral. 1987;Greenwich CT: JAI Press. p. 121-173.
21. Gruder C. Relationship with opponent and partner in mixed-motive bargaining. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 15:1971;403-416.
22. Gruenfeld D. H., Mannix E. A., Williams K. Y., Neale M. A. Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 67:1996;1-15.
23. Guzzo R. A., Shea G. P. Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. Dunnette M. D., Hough L. M. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. 3:1992;269-313 Palo Alto CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
24. Hackman J. R. Work teams in organizations: An orienting framework. Hackman J. R. Groups that work (and those that don't). 1990a;1-14 San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
25. Hackman J. R. Groups that work (and those that don't). 1990b;San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass.
26. Hagafors R., Brehmer B. Does having to justify one's decisions change the nature of the judgment process? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 31:1983;223-232.
27. Hastie R. Experimental evidence on group accuracy. Grofman B., Owen G. Decision research. 1986;129-157 Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
28. Hill G. W. Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin. 91:1982;517-539.
29. Ingham A. G., Levinger G., Graves J., Peckham V. The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 10:1974;371-384.
30. Insko C. A., Schopler J. Hendrick C. Categorization, competition, and collectivity. Review of personality and social psychology. 8:1987;213-251 Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.
31. Insko C. A., Schopler J., Hoyle R. H., Dardis G. J., Graetz K. A. Individual-group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 58:1990;68-79.
32. Janis I. L., Mann L. Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. 1977;New York: Free Press.
33. Keenan P. A., Carnevale P. J. Positive effects of within-group cooperation on between-group negotiation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 19:1989;977-992.
34. Klimoski R. J. The effect of intragroup forces on intergroup conflict resolution. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 8:1972;363-383.
35. Kremenyuk V. International negotiation: Analysis, approaches, issues. 1991;San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Kroon M. B., van Kreveld D., Rabbie J. M. Group versus individual decision making: Effects of accountability and gender on groupthink. Small Group Research. 23:1992;427-458.
37. Latane B., Darley J. M. The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? 1970;New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
38. Latane B., Darley J. M. Help in crisis: Bystander response to an emergency. 1976;Morristown NJ: General Learning Press.
39. Latane B., Williams K., Harkins S. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37:1979;822-832.
40. Laughlin P. R. Social combination process of cooperative, problem-solving groups at verbal intellective tasks. Fishbein M. Progress in social psychology. 1:1980;Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Lax D. A., Sebenius J. K. The manager as negotiator. 1986;New York: Free Press.
42. Levine J. M., Moreland R. Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology. 44:1990;585-612.
43. McAllister P. W., Mitchell T. R., Beach L. R. The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 24:1979;228-244.
44. McCallum D. M., Harring K., Gilmore R., Drenan S., Chase J., Insko C. A., Thibaut J. Competition between groups and between individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 21:1985;301-320.
45. Maass A., Clark R. D. Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence in research. Psychological Bulletin. 95:1984;428-450.
46. Murphy R. The effects of task characteristics on covariation assessment: The impact ofaccountability and judgment frame. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 60:1994;139-155.
47. Mynatt C., Sherman S. J. Responsibility attribution in groups and individuals: A direct test of the diffusion of responsibility hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 32:1975;1111-1118.
48. Neale M. A. The effect of negotiation and arbitration cost salience on bargainer behavior:The role of arbitrator and constituency in negotiator judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 34:1984;97-111.
49. Neale M. A., Bazerman M. H. Negotiator cognition and rationality. 1991;Free Press, New York.
50. Petty R. E., Harkins S. G., Williams K. D. The effects of group diffusion on cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 38:1980;81-92.
51. Pruitt D. G. Negotiation behavior. 1981;New York: Academic Press.
52. Pruitt D. G. Networks and collective scripts: Paying attention to structure in bargaining theory. Kramer R. M., Messick D. M. Negotiation as a social process. 1995;Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
53. Pruitt D. G., Carnevale P. J. Negotiation in social conflict. 1993;Buckingham: Open University Press.
54. Pruitt D. G., Kimmel M. J., Britton S., Carnevale P. J. D., Magenau J. M., Peragallo J., Engram P. The effect of accountability and surveillance on integrative bargaining. Sauermann H. Contributions to experimental economics: Bargaining behavior. 7:1978;310-343 Tubingen Germany: Mohr.
55. Schopler J., Insko C. A., Graetz K. A., Drigotas S., Smith V. A., Dahl K. Individual-group discontinuity: Further evidence for mediation by fear and greed. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 19:1993;419-431.
56. Shaw M. E. Comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. American Journal of Psychology. 44:1932;491-504.
57. Shaw M. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. 1981;New York: McGraw Hill.
58. Simonson I., Nye P. The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 51:1992;416-446.
59. Tetlock P. E. Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45:1983;74-83.
60. Tetlock P. E., Boettger R. Accountability: A social magnifier on the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 57:1989;388-398.
61. Thompson L. Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 27:1991;161-179.
62. Thompson L., Peterson E., Brodt S. E. Team negotiation: An examination of integrative and distributive bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 70:1996;66-78.
63. Weldon E., Gargano G. M. Cognitive loafing: The effects of accountability and shared responsibility on cognitive effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 14:1988;159-171.
64. Whyte G. Diffusion of responsibility: Effects on the escalation tendency. Journal of Applied Psychology. 76:1991;408-415.