See what you've done! Active touch affects the number of perceived visual objects

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 304-309

  Kunde, Wilfried ^a   Kiesel, Andrea ^b  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748796094     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193848     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BLAKE, R., SOBEL, K. V., & JAMES, T. W. (2004). Neural synergy between kinetic vision and touch. Psychological Science, 15, 397-402.
2. CINEL, C., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & POLI, R. (2002). Cross-modal illusory conjunctions between vision and touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1243-1266.
3. DELL'ACQUA, R., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2000). Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference. Memory & Cognition, 28, 184-191.
4. ERNST, M. O., BANKS, M. S., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (2000). Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 69-73.
5. GIBSON, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477-491.
6. GUEST, S., CATMUR, C., LLOYD, D., & SPENCE, C. (2002). Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 161-171.
7. HAY, J. C., PICK, H. L., & IKEDA, K. (1965). Visual capture produced by prism spectacles. Psychonomic Science, 2, 215-216.
8. HOMMEL, B., MÜSSELER, J., ASCHERSLEBEN, G., & PRINZ, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
9. HOMMEL, B., & SCHNEIDER, W. X. (2002). Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes. Visual Cognition, 9, 392-420.
10. HÖTTING, K., & RÖDER, B. (2004). Hearing cheats touch, but less in congenitally blind than in sighted individuals. Psychological Science, 15, 60-64.
11. JAMES, W. (1981). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original edition published 1890)
12. JOUSMÄKI, V., & HARI, R. (1998). Parchment-skin illusion: Sound-biased touch. Current Biology, 8, R190.
13. KLATZKY, R. L., LEDERMAN, S. J., & MATULA, D. (1993). Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 726-743.
14. KUNDE, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 387-394.
15. KUNDE, W., & WEIGELT, M. (2005). Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 145-156.
16. KUNDE, W., & WÜHR, P. (2004). Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli. Psychological Research, 68, 199-207.
17. LEDERMAN, S. J., & ABBOTT, S. G. (1981). Texture perception: Studies of intersensory organization using a discrepancy paradigm and visual versus tactual psychophysics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 902-915.
18. LEDERMAN, S. J., THORNE, G., & JONES, B. (1986). Perception of texture by vision and touch: Multidimensionality and intersensory integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 169-180.
19. LOOMIS, J. M., & LEDERMAN, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 31.1-31.41). New York: Wiley.
20. MÜSSELER, J., & HOMMEL, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 861-872.
21. MÜSSELER, J., WÜHR, P., DANIELMEIER, C., & ZYSSET, S. (2005). Action-induced blindness with lateralized stimuli and responses. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 214-222.
22. PAVANI, F., SPENCE, C., & DRIVER, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11, 353-359.
23. ROCK, I., & VICTOR, J. (1964). Vision and touch: An experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science, 143, 594-596.
24. SHAMS, L., KAMITANI, Y., & SHIMOJO, S. (2000). Illusions: What you see is what you hear. Nature, 408, 788.
25. SHAMS, L., KAMITANI, Y., & SHIMOJO, S. (2002). A visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 147-152.
26. STEIN, B. E., LONDON, N., WILKINSON, L. K., & PRICE, D. D. (1996). Enhancement of perceived visual intensity by auditory stimuli: A psychophysical analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 497-506.
27. VIOLENTYEV, A., SHIMOJO, S., & SHAMS, L. (2005). Touch-induced visual illusion. NeuroReport, 16, 1107-1110.
28. WELCH, R. B., & WARREN, D. H. (1986). Intersensory interactions. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 1. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 25.1-25.36). New York: Wiley.
29. WOHLSCHLÄGER, A. (2000). Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research, 40, 925-930.