Action-induced blindness with lateralized stimuli and responses

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 160, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 214-222

  Müsseler, Jochen ^a   Wühr, Peter ^b   Danielmeier, Claudia ^c   Zysset, Stefan ^c  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Action induced blindness; Dual task; Hemifields; Stimulus response; Visual encoding

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BLINDNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 12144273488     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2009-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433-436
2. Craft JL, Simon JR (1970) Processing symbolic information from a visual display: interference from an irrelevant directional cue. J Exp Psychol 83:415-420
3. Danielmeier C, Zysset S, Müsseler J, von Cramon DY (2004) Where action impairs visual encoding. Cogn Brain Res (in press)
4. De Jong R, Sweet, JB (1994) Preparatory strategies in overlapping-task performance. Percept Psychophys 55:142-151
5. Hellige JB (1996) Hemispheric asymmetry for visual information processing. Acta Neurobiol Exp 56:485-497
6. Hellige JB (2000) Hemispheric asymmetry: what's right and what's left. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA
7. Jolicoeur P (1999) Dual-task interference and visual encoding. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:596-616
8. Lien MC, Proctor RW (2000) Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1260-1280
9. Lien MC, Proctor RW (2002) Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection. Psychon Bull Rev 9:212-238
10. Müsseler J, Wühr P (2002) Response-evoked interference in visual encoding. In: Prinz W, Hommel B (eds.) Attention and performance. XIX. Common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 520-537
11. Müsseler J, Koch I, Wühr P (2004) Testing the boundary conditions for processing irrelevant location information: the cross-task Simon effect. Eur J Cogn Psychol (in press)
12. Pashler H (1998) Attention. Psychology Press, Hove UK
13. Pelli DG (1997) The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis 10:437-442
14. Schubert T, Szameitat AJ (2003) Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study. Cogn Brain Res 17:733-746
15. Sergent J, Hellige JB (1986) Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries. Brain Cogn 5:174-199
16. Simon JR, Hinrichs JV, Craft JL (1970) Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction times as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response- location correspondence. J Exp Psychol 86:97-102
17. Springer SP, Deutsch G (1998) Left brain, right brain. WH Freeman, New York
18. Szameitat AJ, Schubert T, Müller K, von Cramon DY (2002) Localization of executive functions in dual-task performance with fMRI. J Cogn Neurosci 14:1184-1199
19. Telford CW (1931) The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. J Exp Psychol 14:1-37
20. Tipper SP, Lortie C, Baylis GC (1992) Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:891-905
21. Tomonaga M (2002) Action-based distractor effects on the manual response times of chimpanzees during discrimination tasks. Cogn Brain Res 13:235-240
22. Tootell RB, Mendola JD, Hadjikhani NK, Ledden PJ, Liu AK, Reppas JB et al. (1997) Functional analysis of V3A and related areas in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 17:7060-7078
23. van Selst M, Ruthruff E, Johnston JC (1999) Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:1268-1283
24. Wallace RJ (1971) S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. J Exp Psychol 88:354-360
25. Wascher E, Schatz U, Kuder T, Verleger R (2001) Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27:731-751
26. Wühr P, Müsseler J (2002) Blindness to response-compatible stimuli in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Vis Cogn 9:421-457