Neural synergy between kinetic vision and touch

Psychological Science

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 397-402

  Blake, Randolph ^a   Sobel, Kenith V ^a   James, Thomas W ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORIENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TOUCH; VISION;

BRAIN; HUMANS; KINESIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TOUCH; VISION;

EID: 2942676891     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00691.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Amedi, A., Malach, R., Hendler, T., Peled, S., & Zohary, E. (2001). Visuohaptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 324-330.
2. Berkeley, G. (1992). Essay towards a new theory of vision. In Philosophical works (pp. 3-59). Rutland, VT: Everyman's Library. (Original work published 1709)
3. Bradley, D.C., Chang, G.C., & Andersen, R.A. (1998). Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons. Nature, 392, 714-717.
4. Brainard, D.H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.
5. DeAngelis, G.C., Cumming, B.G., & Newsome, W.T. (1998). Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth. Nature, 394, 677-680.
6. DeAngelis, G.C., & Newsome, W.T. (1999). Organization of disparity-selective neurons in macaque area MT. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1398-1415.
7. Dodd, J.V., Krug, K., Cumming, B.G., & Parker, A.J. (2001). Perceptually bistable three-dimensional figures evoke high choice probabilities in cortical area MT. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 4809-4821.
8. Doner, J., Lappin, J.S., & Perfetto, G. (1984). Detection of three-dimensional structure in moving optical patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 1-11.
9. Dosher, B., Sperling, G.S., & Wurst, S.A. (1986). Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure. Vision Research, 26, 973-990.
10. Ernst, M.O., & Banks, M.S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433.
11. Ernst, M.O., Banks, M.S., & Bulthoff, H.H. (2000). Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 69-73.
12. Fisichelli, V.R. (1947). Reversible perspective in Lissajous' figures: Some theoretical considerations. American Journal of Psychology, 60, 240-249.
13. Goebel, R., Khorram-Sefat, D., Muckli, L., Hacker, H., & Singer, W. (1998). The constructive nature of vision: Direct evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of apparent motion and motion imagery. European Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 1563-1573.
14. Guest, S., Catmur, C., Lloyd, D., & Spence, C. (2002). Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 161-171.
15. Hagen, M.C., Franzen, O., McGlone, G., Essick, G., Dancer, C., & Pardo, J.V. (2002). Tactile motion activates the human middle temporal/V5 (MT/V5) complex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 957-964.
16. Heller, M.A. (1982). Visual and tactual texture perception: Intersensory cooperation. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 339-344.
17. Howard, I.P. (1961). An investigation of a satiation process in the reversible perspective of revolving skeletal shapes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 9, 19-33.
18. Huk, A.C., Dougherty, R.F., & Heeger, D.J. (2002). Retinotopy and functional subdivision of human areas MT and MST. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 7195-7205.
19. James, T.W., Humphrey, G.K., Gati, J.S., Servos, P., Menon, R.S., & Goodale, M.A. (2002). Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1706-1714.
20. Leopold, D.A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., & Logothetis, N.K. (2002). Stable perception of visual ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 605-609.
21. Long, G.M., Topino, T.C., & Mondin, G.W. (1992). Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 609-616.
22. Maunsell, J.H., Sclar, G., Nealey, T.A., & DePriest, D.D. (1991). Extraretinal representations in area V4 in the macaque monkey. Visual Neuroscience, 7, 561-573.
23. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
24. Miles, W.R. (1931). Movement interpretations of the silhouette of a revolving fan. American Journal of Psychology, 43, 392-405.
25. Nawrot, M., & Blake, R. (1989). Neural integration of information specifying structure from stereopsis and motion. Science, 244, 716-718.
26. Nawrot, M., & Blake, R. (1991a). The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 230-244.
27. Nawrot, M., & Blake, R. (1991b). A neural network model of kinetic depth. Visual Neuroscience, 6, 219-227.
28. Nawrot, M., & Blake, R. (1993). Visual alchemy: Stereoscopic adaptation produces kinetic depth from random noise. Perception, 22, 635-642.
29. Petersik, J.T. (2002). Buildup and decay of a three-dimensional rotational aftereffect obtained with a three-dimensional figure. Perception, 31, 825-836.
30. Petersik, J.T., Shephard, A., & Malche, R. (1984). A three-dimensional motion aftereffect produced by prolonged adaptation to a rotation simulation. Perception, 13, 489-497.
31. Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A., & Lau, R. (1997). Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature, 385, 308.
32. Tootell, R.B., Reppas, J.B., Kwong, K.K., Malach, R., Born, R.T., Brady, T.J., Rosen, B.R., & Belliveau, J.W. (1995). Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 3215-3230.
33. Wallach, H., & O'Connell, D.N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 205-217.
34. Wilton, R.N. (1985). The recency effect in the perception of ambiguous figures. Perception, 14, 53-61.