Kinetic control of the current through a single molecule

Chemical Physics

Volumn 328, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 173-182

  Petrov, E G ^a   Zelinskyy, Ya R ^a   May, V ^b   Hanggi P ^c  

^a BOGOLYUBOV INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Ukraine)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Charge transmission; Coulomb interaction; Kinetic equations; Rectification

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748791191     PISSN: 03010104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2006.06.028     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Tian W., Datta S., Hong S., Reifenberger R., Henderson J.I., and Kubiak C.P. J. Chem. Phys. 109 (1998) 2874
2. Reed M. Proc. IEEE 87 (1999) 652
3. Metzger R.M. Acc. Chem. Res. 32 (1999) 950
4. Kergueris C., Bourgoin J.-P., Palacin S., Esteve D., Urbina C., Magoga M., and Joachim C. Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 12505
5. Nitzan A. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 52 (2001) 681
6. Hänggi P., Ratner M., and Yaliraki S. Chem. Phys. 281 (2002) 111
7. Zahid F., Paulsson M., and Datta S. In: Morkos (Ed). Edvanced Semiconductors and Organic Nano-techniques (2003), Acad. Press, New York 41 (Chapter 2)
8. Datta S. Nanotechnology 15 (2004) S433
9. Kushmerick J.G., Whitaker C.M., Pollack S.K., Schull T.L., and Shashidhar R. Nanotechnology 15 (2004) S489
10. Ghosh A.W., Damle P.S., Datta S., and Nitzan A. MRS Bulletin June (2004) 391
11. Kushmerick J.G., Holt D.B., Yang J.C., Naciri J., Moore M.H., and Shashidhar R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 086802
12. Nitzan A., and Ratner M.A. Science 300 (2003) 1384
13. Datta S. Electronic Transport in Mesoscopic Systems (1995), University Press, Cambridge
14. Kohler S., Lehmann J., and Hänggi P. Phys. Rep. 406 (2005) 379
15. Camalet S., Lehmann J., Kohler S., and Hänggi P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 210602
16. Camalet S., Kohler S., and Hänggi P. Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 155326
17. Cizek M., Thoss M., and Domcke W. Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 125406
18. Lehmann J., Kohler S., May V., and Hänggi P. J. Chem. Phys. 121 (2004) 2278
19. Reichert J., Ochs R., Beckmann D., Weber H.B., Mayor M., and Löneysen H.v. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 176804
20. Tikhodeev S., Natario M., Makoshi K., Mii T., and Ueba Y. Surf. Sci. 493 (2001) 63
21. Galperin M., Ratner M.A., and Nitzan A. J. Chem. Phys. 121 (2004) 11965
22. Petrov E.G., May V., and Hänggi P. Chem. Phys. 296 (2004) 251
23. Petrov E.G., May V., and Hänggi P. Chem. Phys. 319 (2005) 380
24. Petrov E.G., Tolokh I.S., Demidenko A.A., and Gorbach V.V. Chem. Phys. 193 (1995) 237
25. Petrov E.G., and Hänggi P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2862
26. Nitzan A. J. Phys. Chem. A 105 (2001) 2677
27. Kuznetsov A.M., and Ulstrup J. J. Chem. Phys. 116 (2002) 2149
28. Mujica V., Roitberg A.E., and Ratner M.A. J. Chem. Phys. 112 (2000) 6834
29. Hettler M.H., Schoeller H., and Wenzel W. Europ. Lett. 57 4 (2002) 571
30. Petrov E.G., May V., and Hänggi P. Chem. Phys. 281 (2002) 211
31. Nitzan A., Galperin M., Ingold G.-L., and Grabert H. J. Chem. Phys. 117 (2002) 10837
32. Mujica V., Nitzan A., Dutta S., Ratner M., and Kubiak C.P. J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 91
33. Pati S.K. J. Chem. Phys. 118 (2003) 6529
34. Orellana F., and Claro F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 178302
35. Liang G.C., Ghosh A.W., Paulsson M., and Datta S. Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 115302
36. Häussler W., Kramer B., and Masek J. Z. Phys. B 85 (1991) 435
37. Yeyati A.L., Martin-Rodero A., and Flores F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 2991
38. Kuznetsov A.M., and Ulstrup J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 564 (2004) 209
39. Mitra A., Aleiner I., and Millis A.J. Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004) 245302
40. Joachim C., and Ratner M. PNAS 102 (2005) 8801
41. Galperin M., Nitzan A., and Ratner M. Phys. Rev. B 73 (2006) 045314
42. Anderson P.W. Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 41
43. The used Hubbard version of the Coulomb repulsion is valid for well localized MOs. For definite conditions, in particular, in the case of well separated extended molecular levels, the electron-electron interaction can be described by using a truncated form that is similar to the Hubbard-form [22].
44. Meir Y., Wingreen N.S., and Lee P.A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 3048
45. Meir Y., Wingreen N.S., and Lee P.A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 2601
46. Lehmann J., Ingold G.-L., and Hänggi P. Chem. Phys. 281 (2002) 199
47. If only a pure electronic Hamiltonian (1) is used for a description of electron transfer process then one can obtain a coarse-grained description only.
48. Damle P.S., Ghosh A.W., and Datta S. Phys. Rev. B 64 (2001) 201403
49. Weber H.B., Reichert J., Weigend F., Ochs R., Beckmann D., Mayor M., Ahlrichs R., and Löhneysen H.v. Chem. Phys. 281 (2002) 113
50. Petrov E.G. Low Temp. Phys. 31 (2005) 338
51. Averin D.V., and Nazarov Yu.V. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 2446
52. Glazman L.I., and Pustilnik M. In: Bouchiat H., Gefen Y., Gueron S., Montambaux G., and Dalibard J. (Eds). Nanophysics: Coherence and Transport (2005), Elsevier, Amsterdam 427
53. Sparpaglione M., and Mukamel S. J. Chem. Phys. 88 (1988) 3263
54. A doubly charged molecule does not transmit the extra electron between the leads. This is due to the fact that within the given voltage region only a single MO is assumed to be involved in the transmission process. Since the MO is already completely filled by two extra electrons, then, the third electron cannot be captured by this MO and cannot create a threefold charged virtual or real state with the participation of this single MO.
55. Xiao X., Xu B., and Tao N.J. Nano Lett. 4 (2004) 267
56. Rakshit T., Liang G.-C., Ghosh A.W., and Datta S. Nano Lett. 4 (2004) 1803