Priming and binding in and across perception and action: A correlational analysis of the internal structure of event files

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1785-1804

  Colzato, Lorenza S ^a,b   Warrens, Matthijs J ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; CUES; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33748512069     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210500438304     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allen, K. L. (1982). An investigation of the effectiveness of neurolinguistic programming procedures in treating snake phobics (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri at Kansas City, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43(3), 861-B. (UMI No. AAC8216956)
2. Beale, R. P. (1980). The testing of a model for the representation of consciousness (Doctoral dissertation, The Fielding Institute, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(9), 3565-B. (UMI No. 8106799)
3. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
4. Cody, S. G. (1983). The stability and impact of the primary representational system in neurolinguistic programming: A critical examination (Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44(4), 1232-B. (UMI No. AAC8319187)
5. Cohen, J. D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychological Review, 99, 45-77.
6. Colzato, L. S., Erasmus, V., & Hommel, B. (2004). Moderate alcohol consumption impairs feature binding in visual perception but not across perception and action. Neuroscience Letters, 360, 103-105.
7. Colzato, L. S., Fagioli, S., Erasmus, V., & Hommel B. (2005). Caffeine, but not nicotine enhances visual feature binding. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 591-595.
8. Colzato, L. S., Raffone, A., & Hommel, B. (in press). What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
9. Cowey, A. (1985). Aspects of cortical organization related to selective attention and selective impairments of visual perception: A tutorial review. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 41-62). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R., & Freer, C. (1996). Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 257-303.
11. Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (2001). Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 16-25.
12. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 145-173.
13. Gordon, R. D., & Irwin, D. E. (1996). What's in an object file? Evidence from priming studies. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1260-1277.
14. Gross, J., Schmitz, F., Schnitzler, I., Kessler, K., Shapiro, K., Hommel, B., et al. (2004). Longrange neural synchrony predicts temporal limitations of visual attention in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 13050-13055.
15. Henderson, J. M. (1994). Two representational systems in dynamic visual identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 410-426.
16. Henderson, J. M., & Anes, M. D. (1994). Roles of object-file review and type priming in visual identification within and across eye-fixations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 826-839.
17. Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546-571.
18. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281-320). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
19. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183-216.
20. Hommel, B. (2002). Responding to object files: Automatic integration of spatial information revealed by stimulus-response compatibility effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 567-580.
21. Hommel, B. (2003). Feature integration across perception and action: Event files affect response choice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500.
23. Hommel, B., Alonso, D., & Fuentes, L. J. (2003). Acquisition and generalization of action effects. Visual Cognition, 10, 965-986.
24. Hommel, B., & Colzato, L. S. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Visual Cognition, 11, 483-521.
25. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001a). Codes and their vicissitudes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 910-937.
26. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001b). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
27. Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1-17.
28. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
29. Keil, A., Müller, M. M., Ray, W. J., Gruber, T., & Elbert, T. (1999). Human gamma band activity and perception of a Gestalt. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 7152-7161.
30. Kopell, N., Ermentrout, G. B., Whittington, M. A., & Traub, R. D. (2000). Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97, 1867-1872.
31. Kornblum, S. (1973). Sequential effects in choice RT: A tutorial review. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention & performance IV (pp. 259-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
32. Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., Adam, C., Hasboun, D., & Varela, F. J. (2000). A quantitative study of gamma-band activity in human intracranial recordings triggered by visual stimuli. European Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 2608-2622.
33. Leslie, A. M., & Kaldy, Z. (2001). Indexing objects in infant working memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 61-74.
34. Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P. D., & Scholl, B. J. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: Developing "what" and "where" systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 10-18.
35. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527.
36. May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35-54.
37. McDevitt, J., & Fournier, L. (2001). Withholding a planned action delays execution of partially compatible actions. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 16.
38. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
39. Munk, M. H. J. (2003). The principle of controlling neuronal dynamics in neocortex: Rapid reorganization and consolidation of neuronal assemblies. In R. H. Kluwe, G. Lüer, & F. Rösler (Eds.), Principles of learning and memory (pp. 187-205). Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
40. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-872.
41. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
42. Pratt, J., & Hommel, B. (2003). Symbolic control of visual attention: The role ofworking memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 835-845.
43. Rodriguez, R., Kallenbach, U., Singer, W., & Munk, M. H. (2000). Effects of cholinergic stimulation on gamma oscillations during visual responses in cat visual cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience Supplement, 12, 221.15.
44. Rodriguez, R., Kallenbach, U., Singer, W., & Munk, M. H. (2001). Reduction of gamma-oscillatory responses after scopolamine application in cat visual cortex. Abstract Society of Neuroscience, 27, 123.3.
45. Rodriguez, R., Kallenbach, U., Singer, W., & Munk, M. H. (2004). Short- and long-term effects of cholinergic modulation on gamma oscillations and response synchronization in the visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(46), 10369-10379.
46. Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., Koenig, P., & Singer, W. (1997). Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature, 385, 157-161.
47. Singer, W. (1994). The organization of sensory motor representations in the neocortex: A hypothesis based on temporal coding. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 77-107). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Soetens, E., Boer, L. C., & Hueting, J. E. (1985). Expectancy or automatic facilitation? Separating sequential effects in two-choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 598-616.
49. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1625-1640.
50. Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (2002). Interaction between feature binding in perception and action. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention & performance XIX (pp. 538-552). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
51. Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321-343.
52. Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171-178.
53. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413.
54. Wickens, J., Hyland, B., & Anson, G. (1994). Cortical cell assemblies: A possible mechanism for motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 66-82.