S-R Compatibility Effects Without Response Uncertainty

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 546-571

  Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030510225     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755643     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allport, D.A., Styles, E.A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Anzola, G.P., Bertoloni, G., Buchtel, H.A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1977). Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia, 15, 295-302.
3. Arend, U., & Wandmacher, J. (1987). On the generality of logical recoding in spatial interference tasks. Acta Psychologica, 65, 193-210.
4. Bashore, T.R. (1981). Vocal and manual reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 352-368.
5. Berlucchi, G., Crea, F., Di Stefano, M., & Tassinari, G. (1977). Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 505-517.
6. Bradshaw, J.L., Nettleton, N.C., & Spehr, K. (1982). Sinistral inverters do not possess an anomalous visuomotor organization. Neuropsychologia, 20, 605-609.
7. Bradshaw, J.L., & Umiltà, C. (1984). A reaction time paradigm can simultaneously index spatial compatibility and neural pathway effects: A reply to Levy. Neuropsychologia, 22, 99-101.
8. Broadbent, D.E., & Gregory, M. (1962). Donder's B- and C-reactions and S-R compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 575-578.
9. Callan, J., Klisz, D., & Parsons, O.S. (1974). Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatibility as a function of task complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 1039-1045.
10. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
11. Eimer, M. (1994). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
12. Eimer, M., Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301-313.
13. Fitts, P.M., & Seeger, C.M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
14. Grice, G.R., Boroughs, J.M., & Canham, L. (1984). Temporal dynamics of associative interference and facilitation produced by visual context. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 499-507.
15. Guiard, Y. (1983). The lateral coding of rotations: A study of the Simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 15, 331-342.
16. Hackley, S.A., Schäffer, R., & Miller, J. (1990). Preparation for Donders' type b and c reaction tasks. Acta Psychologica, 74, 15-33.
17. Hasbroucq, T., & Guiard, Y. (1991). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward a conceptual clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 246-266.
18. Hasbroucq, T., Kornblum, S., & Osman, A. (1988). A new look at reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 207-221.
19. Heister, G., Ehrenstein, W.H., & Schroder-Heister, P. (1986). Spatial S-R compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 271-278.
20. Heister, G., Ehrenstein, W.H., & Schroeder-Heister, P. (1987). Spatial S-R compatibility with unimanual two-finger choice reactions: Effects of irrelevant stimulus location. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 195-201.
21. Heister, G., Schroeder-Heister, P., & Ehrenstein, W.H. (1990). Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R.W. Proctor & T.G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 117-143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
22. Hommel, B. (1993a). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 270-279.
23. Hommel, B. (1993b). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55, 280-290.
24. Hommel, B. (1994a). Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56, 179-184.
25. Hommel, B. (1994b). Spontaneous decay of response code activation. Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56, 261-268.
26. Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: Toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764-775.
27. Hommel, B. (in press). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
28. Jersild, A.T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, whole number 89.
29. Klapp, S.T., Greim, D.M., Mendicino, C.M., & Koenig, R.S. (1979). Anatomic and environmental dimensions of stimulus-response compatibility: Implication for theories of memory coding. Acta Psychologica, 43, 367-379.
30. Kornblum, S. (1965). Response competition and/or inhibition in two-choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science, 2, 55-56.
31. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
32. Lippa, Y. (in press). A referential-coding explanation for compatibility effects of physically orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
33. Los, S.A. (1995). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam.
34. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R.W. (1994). Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 286-298.
35. Marzi, C.A., Bisiacchi, P., & Nicoletti, R. (1991). Is interhemispheric transfer of visuomotor information asymmetric? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 29, 1163-1177.
36. Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., & Ladavas, E. (1984). Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors. Acta Psychologica, 57, 133-143.
37. O'Leary, M.J., Barber, P.J., & Simon, J.R. (1994). Does stimulus correspondence account for the Simon effect? Comments on Hasbroucq and Guiard (1991). Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 56, 203-209.
38. Poffenberger, A.T. (1912). Reaction time to retinal stimulation with special reference to the time lost in conduction through nerve centers. Archives of Psychology, 23, 1-73.
39. Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167-201). Berlin: Springer.
40. Proctor, R.W., Reeve, T.G., & Van Zandt, T. (1992). Salient-features coding in response selection. In G.E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior, Vol. 2 (pp. 727-741). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
41. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
42. Reeve, T.G., & Proctor, R.W. (1988). Determinants of two-choice reaction-time patterns for same-hand and different-hand finger pairings. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 317-340.
43. Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L.G., & Umiltà, C. (1986). What is crossed in crossed-hand effects? Acta Psychologica, 62, 89-100.
44. Rogers, R.D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
45. Simon, J.R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R.W. Proctor & T.G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
46. Simon, J.R., Hinrichs, J.V., & Craft, J.L. (1970). Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97-102.
47. Simon, J.R., & Rudell, A.P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
48. Spector, A., & Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669-679.
49. Stoffels, E.J., Van der Molen, M.W., & Keuss, P.G.J. (1989). An additive factor analysis of the effect(s) of location cues associated with auditory stimuli on stages of information processing. Acta Psychologica, 70, 161-197.
50. Teichner, W.H., & Krebs, M.J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 81, 75-98.
51. Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R.W. Proctor & T.G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 89-116). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
52. Van der Molen, M.W.., & Keuss, P.J.G. (1981). Response selection and the processing of auditory intensity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 177-184.
53. Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., & Heilman, K.M. (1990). Attentional processes in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R.W. Proctor & TG. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 261-275). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
54. Wallace, R.J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.