Ambulatory activities maintain cortical bone after total hip arthroplasty

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 450, Issue , 2006, Pages 129-137

  Rosenbaum, Teri G ^a,b,c   Bloebaum, Roy D ^a,b,e   Ashrafi, Shadi ^a,b   Lester, D Kevin ^d  

^a Bone and Joint Research Laboratory   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CADAVER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORTICAL BONE; DEMOGRAPHY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; GEOMETRY; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING SYSTEM; MOBILIZATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PERIOSTEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; FEMALE; FEMUR; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; WALKING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; WALKING;

EID: 33748421763     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000223981.21584.35     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aamodt A, Lund-Larsen J, Eine J, Andersen E, Benum P, Husby OS. Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems: an experimental study in human femora. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:921-929.
2. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34:859-871.
3. Bloebaum RD, Liau DW, Rosenbaum TG, Lester KD. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement and accuracy of bone mineral after unilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:612-622.
4. Bryan JM, Sumner DR, Hurwitz DE, Tompkins GS, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO. Altered load history affects periprosthetic bone loss following cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:762-768.
5. Cohen B, Rushton N. Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:479-483.
6. Cristofolini L. A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1997;25:409-483.
7. Currey JD. The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. J Biomech. 1988;21:131-139.
8. Currey JD, Brear K, Zioupos P. The effects of ageing and changes in mineral content in degrading the toughness of human femora. J Biomech. 1996;29:257-260.
9. D'Aubigne RM, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954;36:451-475.
10. Dickenson RP, Hutton WC, Stott JRR. The mechanical properties of bone in osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63:233-239.
11. Dorr LD, Faugere M-C, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14:231-242.
12. Emmanual J, Hornbeck C, Bloebaum RD. A polymethyl methacrylate method for large specimens of mineralized bone with implants. Stain Technol. 1987;62:401-410.
13. Engh CA, McGovern TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1009-1020.
14. Engh CA Jr, Young AM, Engh CA Sr, Hopper RH Jr. Clinical consequences of stress shielding after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:157-163.
15. Freedman KB, Bernstein J. Sample size and statistical power in clinical orthopaedic research. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1454-1460.
16. Frost HM. Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": a proposal. Anat Rec. 1987;219:1-9.
17. Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Cruz-Pardos A, Madero R, Ortega-Andreu M. Total hip arthroplasty with use of the cementless Zweymuller Alloclassic system: a ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:296-303.
18. Grynpas MD, Holmyard D. Changes in quality of bone mineral on aging and in disease. Scanning Microsc. 1988;2:1045-1054.
19. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end stage results using a new method of evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737-755.
20. Kaptoge S, Dalzell N, Loveridge N, Beck TJ, Khaw KT, Reeve J. Effects of gender, anthropometric variables, and aging on the evolution of hip strength in men and women aged over 65. Bone. 2003;32:561-570.
21. Kerner J, Huiskes R, van Lenthe GH, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B, Engh CA, Amis AA. Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. J Biomech. 1999;32:695-703.
22. Kilgus DJ, Shimaoka EE, Tipton JS, Eberle RW. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement of bone mineral density around porous-coated cementless femoral implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:279-287.
23. Kuo TY, Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD. Comparison of human, primate, and canine femora: implications for biomaterials testing in total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;40:475-489.
24. Lester DK, Helm M. Mini-incision posterior approach for hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol. 2001;9:245-253.
25. Lieberman DE, Polk JD, Demes B. Predicting long bone loading from cross-sectional geometry. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004;123:156-171.
26. Maloney WJ, Sychterz C, Bragdon C, McGovern T, Jasty M, Engh CA, Harris WH. The Otto Aufranc Award: Skeletal response to well fixed femoral components inserted with and without cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;333:15-26.
27. Martin RB, Ishida J. The relative effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization on bone strength. J Biomech. 1989;22:419-426.
28. McAuley JP, Sychterz CJ, Engh CA Sr. Influence of porous coating level on proximal femoral remodeling: a postmortem analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:146-153.
29. McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Barker MB, Court-Brown CM. Age-related changes in the tensile properties of cortical bone: the relative importance of changes in porosity, mineralization, and microstructure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1193-1205.
30. Murphy SB, Rodriguez J. Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(suppl 1):115-119.
31. Nagurka ML, Hayes WC. An interactive graphics package for calculating cross-sectional properties of complex shapes. J Biomech. 1980;13:59-64.
32. National Institutes of Health. NIH Consensus Development Conference, September 12-14, 1994. Bethesda, MD: Nationals Institutes of Health; 1994;12:1-31.
33. Oh I, Harris WH. Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur: an in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:75-85.
34. Parfitt A. Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences. Calcif Tissue Int. 1984;36(suppl 1):S123-S128.
35. Pitto RP, Schramm M, Hohmann D, Schmidt R. Clinical outcome and quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling of an uncemented femoral component with taper design. A prospective study. Chir Organi Mov. 2001;86:87-97.
36. Pytel A, Kiusalaas J. Engineering Mechanics: Statics. 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 1999.
37. Rosenbaum TG, Hamblin T, Bloebaum RD. Determining the degree of cortical bone asymmetry in bilateral, nonpathological, human femur pairs. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;76:450-455.
38. Sankoh AJ, Huque MF, Dubey SD. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1997;16:2529-2542.
39. Schmidt R, Muller L, Kress A, Hirschfelder H, Aplas A, Pitto RP. A computed tomography assessment of femoral and acetabular bone changes after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2002;26:299-302.
40. Silva MJ, Reed KL, Robertson DD, Bragdon C, Harris WH, Maloney WJ. Reduced bone stress as predicted by composite beam theory correlates with cortical bone loss following cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:525-531.
41. Skedros JG, Mason MW, Nelson MC, Bloebaum RD. Evidence of structural and material adaptation to specific strain features in cortical bone. Anat Rec. 1996;246:47-63.
42. Smolinski P, Rubash H. Bone remodeling around total hip implants. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1992;20:461-483.
43. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA. The influence of clinical factors on periprosthetic bone remodeling. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:285-292.
44. Sychterz CJ, Topoleski LD, Sacco M, Engh CA Sr. Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;389:218-227.
45. Thompson DD. Age changes in bone mineralization, cortical thickness, and Haversian canal area. Calcif Tissue Int. 1980;31:5-11.
46. Torchia ME, Ruff CB. A quantitative assessment of cross-sectional cortical bone remodeling in the femoral diaphysis following hip arthroplasty in elderly females. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:883-891.
47. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(suppl 1):134-137.
48. Wick M, Lester DK. Radiological changes in second- and third-generation Zweymuller stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:1108-1114.