The dependability and interchangeability of assessment methods in science

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 277-301

  Webb, Noreen M ^a   Schlackman, Jonah ^a   Sugrue, Brenda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034414898     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15324818AME1303_4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson, J. A. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Bennett, R., & Ward, W. (Eds.). (1993). Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Brennan, R. L. (1992). Elements ofgeneralizability theory (Rev. ed.). Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
4. Brennan, R. L., Gao, X., & Colton, D. A. (1995). Generalizability analyses of Work Keys listening and writing tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 157-176.
5. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements. New York: Wiley.
6. Cronbach, L. J., Linn, R. L., Brennan, R. L., & Haertel, E. H. (1997). Generalizability analysis for performance assessments of student achievement or school effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 373-399.
7. Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance mastery. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8. Gao, X., Shavelson, R. J., & Baxter, G. P. (1994). Generalizability of large-scale performance assessments in science: Promises and problems. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 323-334.
9. Gao, X., Shavelson, R. J., Brennan, R. L., & Baxter, G. (1996). A multivariate generalizability theory approach to convergent validity of performance-based assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New York.
10. McBee, M. M., & Barnes, L. L. B. (1998). The generalizability of a performance assessment measuring achievement in eighth-grade mathematics. Applied Measurement in Education, 11, 179-194.
11. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
12. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
13. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Baxter, G. P., & Shavelson, R. J. (1993). On the stability of performance assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 41-53.
14. Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Gao, X. (1993). Sampling variability of performance assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, pp. 215-232.
15. Shavelson, R. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Wiley, E. W. (1999). Note on sources of sampling variability in science performance assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 36, 61-71.
16. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1981). Generalizability theory: 1973-1980. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 133-166.
17. Sugrue, B., & Webb, N., Schlackman, J. (1998, April). The interchangeability of assessment methods in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA.
18. Troper, J. D. (1997). The effects of small-group discussion on students' learning and transfer of ideas in science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
19. Wang, J. (1996). A multilevel modeling study of opportunity to learn (OTL) and science achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
20. Webb, N. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Maddahian, E. (1983). Multivariate generalizability theory. In L. J. Fyans (Ed.), Generalizability theory: Inferences and practical applications (pp. 67-81). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.