On rejecting emotional lures created by phonological neighborhood activation

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 847-853

  Starns, Jeffrey J ^a   Cook, Gabriel I ^b   Hicks, Jason L ^a   Marsh, Richard L ^c  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Emotional lures; False recognition; Metacognition; Phonological lures; Recognition decision criteria

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; DEFENSE MECHANISM; EMOTION; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SEMANTICS; TABOO;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; EMOTIONS; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; REJECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); REPRESSION; REPRESSION, PSYCHOLOGY; SEMANTICS; TABOO; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 33746639266     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.847     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Benjamin, A. S. (2001). On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 941-947.
3. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Recollection rejection: How children edit their false memories. Developmental Psychology, 38, 156-172.
4. Brown, J., Lewis, V. J., & Monk, A. F. (1977). Memorability, word frequency and negative recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 461-473.
5. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund. S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
6. Dodson, C. S., & Hege, A. C. G. (2005). Speeded retrieval abolishes the false memory suppression effect: Evidence for the distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 726-731.
7. Dodson, C. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). "If I had said it I would have remembered it": Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomi Bulletin & Review, 8, 155-161.
8. Donaldson. W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275-277.
9. Freyd, J. J., & Gleaves, D. H. (1996). "Remembering" words not presented in lists: Relevance to the current recovered/false memory controversy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and. Cognition, 22, 811-813.
10. Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 120-128.
11. Gallo, D. A., Weiss, J. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2004). Reducing false recognition with criterial recollection tests: Distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 473-493.
12. Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (2000). Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1483-1498.
13. Israel, L., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 577-581.
14. Jacoby, L. L., Jones, T. C., & Dolan, P. O. (1998). Two effects of repetition: Support for a dual-process model of knowledge judgments and exclusion errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 705-709.
15. Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139-154.
16. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby. L. L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
17. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
18. Lozito, J. P., & Mulligan, N. W. (in press). Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: Effects of semantic encoding and divided attention. Memory & Cognition.
19. Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). Gender and orientation stereotypes bias source-monitoring attributions. Memory, 14, 148-160.
20. Pesta, B. J., Murphy, M. D., & Sanders, R. E. (2001). Are emotionally charged lures immune lo false memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 328-338.
21. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
22. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory & language, 43, 67-88.
23. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 145-166.
24. Sommers, M. S., & Lewis, B. P. (1999). Who really lives next door: Creating false memories with phonological neighbors. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 83-108.
25. Starns, J. J., Hicks. J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (in press). Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule. Memory.
26. Strack, F., & Bless, H. (1994). Memory for nonoccurrences: Metacognitive and presuppositional strategies. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 203-217.
27. Stretch. V., & Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1379-1396.
28. Watson, J. M., Balota, D. A., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2003). Creating false memories with hybrid lists of semantic and phonological associates: Over-additive false memories produced by converging associative networks. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 95-118.