Behavioral analysis of olfactory coding and computation in rodents

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 429-434

  Mainen, Zachary F ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CHEMOSENSITIVITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ETHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; OLFACTORY SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; RODENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; MICE; OLFACTORY BULB; OLFACTORY PATHWAYS; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR NEURONS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RATS; REACTION TIME; RODENTIA; SMELL;

EID: 33746552792     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.003     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Shepherd G.M., and Greer C.A. Olfactory bulb. In: Shepherd G.M. (Ed). The Synaptic Organization of the Brain (1998), Oxford University Press 159-203
2. Buck L., and Axel R. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65 (1991) 175-187
3. Davis J.L., and Eichenbaum H. Olfaction: a model system for computational neuroscience (1991), MIT Press
4. Hopfield J.J. Odor space and olfactory processing: collective algorithms and neural implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96 (1999) 12506-12511
5. Adrian ED. The electrical activity of the mammalian olfactory bulb. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 2 (1950) 377-388
6. Laurent G., Stopfer M., Friedrich R.W., Rabinovich M.I., Volkovskii A., and Abarbanel H.D. Odor encoding as an active, dynamical process: experiments, computation, and theory. Annu Rev Neurosci 24 (2001) 263-297
7. Mori K., Nagao H., and Yoshihara Y. The olfactory bulb: coding and processing of odor molecule information. Science 286 (1999) 711-715
8. Stewart W.B., Kauer J.S., and Shepherd G.M. Functional organization of rat olfactory bulb analysed by the 2-deoxyglucose method. J Comp Neurol 185 (1979) 715-734
9. Rubin B.D., and Katz L.C. Optical imaging of odorant representations in the mammalian olfactory bulb. Neuron 23 (1999) 499-511
10. Wilson R.W., and Mainen Z.M. Early events in olfactory processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 29 (2006) 163-201
11. Laurent G. Olfactory processing: maps, time and codes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7 (1997) 547-553
12. Parker A.J., and Newsome W.T. Sense and the single neuron: probing the physiology of perception. Annu Rev Neurosci 21 (1998) 227-277
13. Mombaerts P., Wang F., Dulac C., Chao S.K., Nemes A., et al. Visualizing an olfactory sensory map. Cell 87 (1996) 675-686
14. Yokoi M., Mori K., and Nakanishi S. Refinement of odor molecule tuning by dendrodendritic synaptic inhibition in the olfactory bulb. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92 (1995) 3371-3375
15. Xiong W., and Chen W.R. Dynamic gating of spike propagation in the mitral cell lateral dendrites. Neuron 34 (2002) 115-126
16. Vucinic D., Cohen L.B., and Kosmidis E.K. Interglomerular center-surround inhibition shapes odorant-evoked input to the mouse olfactory bulb in vivo. J Neurophysiol 95 (2006) 1881-1887
17. Linster C., Johnson B.A., Yue E., Morse A., Xu Z., Hingco E.E., Choi Y., Choi M., Messiha A., and Leon M. Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers. J Neurosci 21 (2001) 9837-9843
18. Rubin B.D., and Katz L.C. Spatial coding of enantiomers in the rat olfactory bulb. Nat Neurosci 4 (2001) 355-356
19. Linster C., Johnson B.A., Morse A., Yue E., and Leon M. Spontaneous versus reinforced olfactory discriminations. J Neurosci 22 (2002) 6842-6845
20. Uchida N., and Mainen Z.F. Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat. Nat Neurosci 6 (2003) 1224-1229
21. Youngentob S.L., Markert L.M., Mozell M.M., and Hornung D.E. A method for establishing a five odorant identification confusion matrix task in rats. Physiol Behav 47 (1990) 1053-1059
22. Kent P.F., Mozell M.M., Youngentob S.L., and Yurco P. Mucosal activity patterns as a basis for olfactory discrimination: comparing behavior and optical recordings. Brain Res 981 (2003) 1-11
23. Lu X.C., and Slotnick B.M. Olfaction in rats with extensive lesions of the olfactory bulbs: implications for odor coding. Neuroscience 84 (1998) 849-866
24. Slotnick B., and Bodyak N. Odor discrimination and odor quality perception in rats with disruption of connections between the olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulbs. J Neurosci 22 (2002) 4205-4216
25. Slotnick B., and Bisulco S. Detection and discrimination of carvone enantiomers in rats with olfactory bulb lesions. Neuroscience 121 (2003) 451-457
26. Slotnick B., Cockerham R., and Pickett E. Olfaction in olfactory bulbectomized rats. J Neurosci 24 (2004) 9195-9200. When the bulb is ablated, olfactory axons innervate and form 'glomeruli' in other areas of the forebrain. The authors tested whether these connections are sufficient for odor discrimination and detection. Direct innervation of the olfactory cortex was sufficient to support behavior in many cases, whereas innervation of the frontal pole was not.
27. Martin C., Gervais R., Hugues E., Messaoudi B., and Ravel N. Learning modulation of odor-induced oscillatory responses in the rat olfactory bulb: a correlate of odor recognition?. J Neurosci 24 (2004) 389-397. The authors examine how oscillations in the olfactory bulb change over the course of olfactory training. Gamma oscillations (in this study defined as 60-90 Hz) are suppressed and beta (here, 20-40 Hz) oscillations are enhanced as the animal learns a two-odor go or no-go discrimination.
28. Martin C., Gervais R., Chabaud P., Messaoudi B., and Ravel N. Learning-induced modulation of oscillatory activities in the mammalian olfactory system: the role of the centrifugal fibres. J Physiol (Paris) 98 (2004) 467-478
29. Stopfer M., Bhagavan S., Smith B.H., and Laurent G. Impaired odour discrimination on desynchronization of odour-encoding neural assemblies. Nature 390 (1997) 70-74
30. Sachse S., and Galizia C.G. Role of inhibition for temporal and spatial odor representation in olfactory output neurons: a calcium imaging study. J Neurophysiol 87 (2002) 1106-1117
31. Fletcher M.L., Smith A.M., Best A.R., and Wilson D.A. High-frequency oscillations are not necessary for simple olfactory discriminations in young rats. J Neurosci 25 (2005) 792-798. Neonatal rats (1-2 weeks postnatal) have immature olfactory bulb circuitry and much smaller odor-evoked local field potential oscillations compared with those of mature animals. Yet these animals showed normal odor-specific behavioral responses indexed using a measurement of heart-rate: habituation to a given odor reduces the response to that odor but has much less effect on closely related odors.
32. Friedrich R.W., and Laurent G. Dynamic optimization of odor representations by slow temporal patterning of mitral cell activity. Science 291 (2001) 889-894
33. Abraham N.M., Spors H., Carleton A., Margrie T.W., Kuner T., and Schaefer A.T. Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice. Neuron 44 (2004) 865-876. The authors measured the speed of odor discrimination using a modification of a go/no-go task in which mice must stay at the sampling port to receive water for rewarded stimuli ('stay or no-stay'). Discrimination times, defined using the earliest detectable responses (withdrawals) to unrewarded stimuli, were short (around 200 ms) for easy discriminations and increased to 300 ms for the hardest binary mixtures. The use of asymmetric reward (stay responses are rewarded, whereas no-stay responses are unrewarded) and non-standard timing metrics makes comparison of the data to other psychophysical measurements more difficult.
34. Lauwereyns J., Watanabe K., Coe B., and Hikosaka O. A neural correlate of response bias in monkey caudate nucleus. Nature 418 (2002) 413-417
35. Bodyak N., and Slotnick B. Performance of mice in an automated olfactometer: odor detection, discrimination and odor memory. Chem Senses 24 (1999) 637-645
36. Stopfer M., Jayaraman V., and Laurent G. Intensity versus identity coding in an olfactory system. Neuron 39 (2003) 991-1004
37. Friedrich R.W., Habermann C.J., and Laurent G. Multiplexing using synchrony in the zebrafish olfactory bulb. Nat Neurosci 7 (2004) 862-871
38. Dittman A., and Quinn T. Homing in pacific salmon: mechanisms and ecological basis. J Exp Biol 199 (1996) 83-91
39. Wallace D.G., Gorny B., and Whishaw I.Q. Rats can track odors, other rats, and themselves: implications for the study of spatial behavior. Behav Brain Res 131 (2002) 185-192
40. Wiltrout C., Dogra S., and Linster C. Configurational and nonconfigurational interactions between odorants in binary mixtures. Behav Neurosci 117 (2003) 236-245
41. Kay L.M., Crk T., and Thorngate J. A redefinition of odor mixture quality. Behav Neurosci 119 (2005) 726-733. Odors combined in a mixture are hypothesized to interact perceptually in multiple ways. 'Elemental' interactions retain the identity of their components, whereas 'synthetic' or 'configural' interactions produce mixtures with novel perceptual properties. Here, rats were trained to associate binary mixtures of similar and dissimilar odorants with food and then were probed for generalization of responses to the components of the mixture. The results suggested that interactions could mainly by explained by 'overshadowing' or mixture suppression - whereby one component dominates the mixture.
42. Fortin N.J., Agster K.L., and Eichenbaum H.B. Critical role of the hippocampus in memory for sequences of events. Nat Neurosci 5 (2002) 458-462
43. Fortin N.J., Wright S.P., and Eichenbaum H. Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus. Nature 431 (2004) 188-191
44. McAlonan K., and Brown V.J. Orbital prefrontal cortex mediates reversal learning and not attentional set shifting in the rat. Behav Brain Res 146 (2003) 97-103
45. Slotnick B. Animal cognition and the rat olfactory system. Trends Cogn Sci 5 (2001) 216-222
46. Vetter R.S., Sage A.E., Justus K.A., Carde R.T., and Galizia C.G. Temporal integrity of an airborne odor stimulus is greatly affected by physical aspects of the odor delivery system. Chem Senses 31 (2006) 359-369
47. Kepecs A., Uchida N., and Mainen Z.F. The sniff as a unit of olfactory processing. Chem Senses 31 (2006) 167-179
48. Spors H., Wachowiak M., Cohen L.B., and Friedrich R.W. Temporal dynamics and latency patterns of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb. J Neurosci 26 (2006) 1247-1259
49. Buonviso N., Amat C., and Litaudon P. Respiratory modulation of olfactory neurons in the rodent brain. Chem Senses 31 (2006) 145-154
50. Komisaruk B.R. Synchrony between limbic system theta activity and rhythmical behavior in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 70 (1970) 482-492
51. Kay L.M. Theta oscillations and sensorimotor performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 3863-3868
52. Uchida N., Kepecs A., and Mainen Z.F. Seeing at a glance, smelling in a whiff: limits on temporal integration in perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 7 (2006) 485-491
53. Rajan R., Clement J.P., and Bhalla U.S. Rats smell in stereo. Science 311 (2006) 666-670. Rats were trained to discriminate between odors delivered from left or right odor tubes by responding to left or the right choice ports. The authors used uni-nasal occlusion to demonstrate that animals used a binasal comparison to perform the task. The rats could detect not only location but also latency differences as short as 50 ms. Rats required only 1-2 sniffs for localization.
54. Shimshek D.R., Bus T., Kim J., Mihaljevic A., Mack V., Seeburg P.H., Sprengel R., and Schaefer A.T. Enhanced odor discrimination and impaired olfactory memory by spatially controlled switch of AMPA receptors. PLoS Biol 3 (2005) e354
55. Kay L.M., and Laurent G. Odor- and context-dependent modulation of mitral cell activity in behaving rats. Nat Neurosci 2 (1999) 1003-1009
56. Rinberg D, Koulakov A, Ollinger F, Geperin A: Mitral cell responses in awake and anesthetized mice [abstract]. Soc Neurosci Abstr 2004: 139.11.
57. Murakami M., Kashiwadani H., Kirino Y., and Mori K. State-dependent sensory gating in olfactory cortex. Neuron 46 (2005) 285-296
58. Aston-Jones G., and Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu Rev Neurosci 28 (2005) 403-450
59. Shadlen M.N., and Newsome W.T. Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 86 (2001) 1916-1936