Configurational and nonconfigurational interactions between odorants in binary mixtures

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 236-245

  Wiltrout, Charles ^a   Dogra, Samriti ^a   Linster, Christiane ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUTANOL; BUTYRALDEHYDE; CARVONE; LIMONENE; PENTANAL; PROPIONALDEHYDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HABITUATION; LEARNING; MALE; NONHUMAN; ODOR; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; RAT; RESPONSE TIME; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DRUG INTERACTIONS; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; ODORS; PERCEPTION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REACTION TIME; SMELL;

EID: 0037382714     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.236     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cain, W. S., & Drexler, M. (1974). Scope and evaluation of odor counteraction and masking. In W. S. Cain (Ed.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 237. Odors: Evaluation, utilization, and control (pp. 427-439). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
2. Chandra, S., & Smith, B. H. (1998). An analysis of synthetic processing of odor mixtures in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Journal of Experimental Biology, 201(Pt 22), 3113-3121.
3. Cleland, T. A., Morse, A., Yue, E. L., & Linster, C. (2002). Behavioral models of odor similarity. Behavioral Neuroscience, 116, 222-231.
4. Couvillon, P. A., Campos, A. C., Bass, T. D., & Bitterman, M. E. (2001). Intermodal blocking in honeybees. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54(B), 369-381.
5. Derby, C. D., Hutson, M., Livermore, B. A., & Lynn, W. H. (1996). Generalization among related complex odorant mixtures and their components: Analysis of olfactory perception in the spiny lobster. Physiology & Behavior, 60, 87-95.
6. Fletcher, M. L., & Wilson, D. A. (2002). Experience modifies olfactory acuity: Acetylcholine-dependent learning decreases behavioral generalization between similar odorants. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, RC201.
7. Gerber, B., & Ullrich, J. (1999). No evidence for olfactory blocking in honeybee classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202, 1839-1854.
8. Giannaris, E. L., Cleland, T. A., & Linster, C. (2002). Intramodal blocking between olfactory stimuli in rats. Physiology & Behavior, 75, 1-6.
9. Hosler, J. S., & Smith, B. H. (2000). Blocking and the detection of odor components in blends. Journal of Experimental Biology, 203, 2797-2806.
10. Jinks, A., & Laing, D. G. (1999). A limit in the processing of components in odour mixtures. Perception, 28, 395-404.
11. Kamin, L. J. (1968). Attention-like processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on Predictive Behavior: Aversive stimuli (pp. 9-32). Coral Gables, FL: Miami University Press.
12. Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. Campbell & R. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-298). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
13. Laing, D. G., & Francis, G. W. (1989). The capacity of humans to identify odors in mixtures. Physiology & Behavior, 46, 809-814.
14. Laing, D. G., Panhuber, H., Willcox, M. E., & Pittman, E. A. (1984). Quality and intensity of binary odor mixtures. Physiology & Behavior, 33, 309-319.
15. Laska, M., & Hudson, R. (1993). Discriminating parts from the whole: Determinants of odor mixture perception in squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus. Journal of Comparative Physiology: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 173(A), 249-256.
16. Linster, C., & Hasselmo, M. E. (1999). Behavioral responses to aliphatic aldehydes can be predicted from known electrophysiological responses of mitral cells in the olfactory bulb. Physiology & Behavior, 66, 497-502.
17. Linster, C., Johnson, B. A., Morse, A., Yue, E., & Leon, M. (2002). Spontaneous versus reinforced olfactory discriminations. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 6842-6845.
18. Linster, C., Johnson, B. A., Yue, E., Morse, A., Xu, Z., Hingco, E. E., et al. (2001). Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 9837-9843.
19. Linster, C., & Smith, B. H. (1999). Generalization between binary odor mixtures and their components in the rat. Physiology & Behavior, 66, 701-707.
20. Livermore, A., & Laing, D. G. (1998). The influence of odor type on the discrimination and identification of odorants in multicomponent odor mixtures. Physiology & Behavior, 65, 311-320.
21. Lynn, W. H., Meyer, E. A., Peppiatt, C. E., & Derby, C. D. (1994). Perception of odor mixtures by the spiny lobster Panulirus argus. Chemical Senses, 19, 331-347.
22. Sahley, C. L., Martin, K. A., & Gelperin, A. (1990). Analysis of associative learning in the terrestrial mollusc Limax maximus: II. Appetitive learning. Journal of Comparative Physiology: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 167(A), 339-345.
23. Smith, B. H. (1996). The role of attention in learning about odorants. Biological Bulletin, 191, 76-83.
24. Smith, B. H. (1998). Analysis of interaction in binary odorant mixtures. Physiology & Behavior, 65, 397-407.
25. Smith, B. H., & Cobey, S. (1994). The olfactory memory of the honeybee Apis mellifera: II. Blocking between odorants in binary mixtures. Journal of Experimental Biology, 195, 91-108.
26. Staubli, U., Fraser, D., Faraday, R., & Lynch, G. (1987). Olfaction and the "data" memory system in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 757-765.
27. Valentincic, T., Kralj, J., Stenovec, M., Koce, A., & Caprio, J. (2000). The behavioral detection of binary mixtures of amino acids and their individual components by catfish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 203, 3307-3317.